Iran Barkley
Iran Barkley
The guy beat Hearns twice in his prime and never we t to be a top dog.. Never saw him fight so for the pros out here what was the guy s problem?
Re: Iran Barkley
You mean Barkley's prime right? Because it definitely wasn't Hearns' prime.
He was a tough, raw fighter who had some power, and was very brave and courageous and willing to trade, but he wasn't too terribly hard for the Elite guys to outbox or pick apart.
Tommy was lighting him up something fierce in the 1st fight with body shots before Barkley caught him.
He was a tough, raw fighter who had some power, and was very brave and courageous and willing to trade, but he wasn't too terribly hard for the Elite guys to outbox or pick apart.
Tommy was lighting him up something fierce in the 1st fight with body shots before Barkley caught him.
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Re: Iran Barkley
I dont think Hearns had a terribly great chin. He was a bloody good fighter in his time but if you caught him he was very vulnerable.gilgamesh wrote:You mean Barkley's prime right? Because it definitely wasn't Hearns' prime.
He was a tough, raw fighter who had some power, and was very brave and courageous and willing to trade, but he wasn't too terribly hard for the Elite guys to outbox or pick apart.
Tommy was lighting him up something fierce in the 1st fight with body shots before Barkley caught him.
Re: Iran Barkley
Barkley was excellent. He was one of the scariest looking dudes around at the time and just as fierce as he looked.
-
paddy chavez
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 2678
- Joined: 13 Jun 2017, 08:08
Re: Iran Barkley
Hearns was probably 30 seconds away from stopping Barkley he was landing some bombs and way to fast for Barkley.gilgamesh wrote:You mean Barkley's prime right? Because it definitely wasn't Hearns' prime.
He was a tough, raw fighter who had some power, and was very brave and courageous and willing to trade, but he wasn't too terribly hard for the Elite guys to outbox or pick apart.
Tommy was lighting him up something fierce in the 1st fight with body shots before Barkley caught him.
As for Iran Barkley he was a very big middle weight who used his strength to win .
Re: Iran Barkley
he frightened van horn half to death before their fight !Noxy wrote:Barkley was excellent. He was one of the scariest looking dudes around at the time and just as fierce as he looked.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15708
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Iran Barkley
Iran Barkley was a very tough middleweight that always came to fight. He was always prepared. It wasn't like you just walk over him and beat him that easy. If you wasn't in your best of shape, mentally and physically, you will lose that fight with him. He was a fighter that fought to the best of his capabilities, win, lose or draw.
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15182
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: Iran Barkley
At times good; at times awful to mediocre. Never great. He could have had a better career had he always fought hard and smart.
Re: Iran Barkley
No truer words spoken.Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑30 Aug 2017, 15:38 At times good; at times awful to mediocre. Never great. He could have had a better career had he always fought hard and smart.
-
overhand_right
- Heavyweight

Re: Iran Barkley
The real question is Is there a more unlikely fight in all of boxing history than Iran Barkley versus Gerrie Coetzee?