Dana White said 6,5 millions ppv

Post Reply
Cloutov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 472
Joined: 07 Apr 2010, 10:21

Dana White said 6,5 millions ppv

Post by Cloutov »

I v seen this yesterday on the MMA hours. Big numbers has expected.
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6244
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Dana White said 6,5 millions ppv

Post by JCS »

How many will be refunded?
FastestHandsInThewest
Super Lightweight
Posts: 174
Joined: 16 Jun 2017, 01:11

Re: Dana White said 6,5 millions ppv

Post by FastestHandsInThewest »

I knew it would break records.
Best Coast
Welterweight
Posts: 3133
Joined: 07 Mar 2016, 22:53

Re: Dana White said 6,5 millions ppv

Post by Best Coast »

Cloutov wrote:I v seen this yesterday on the MMA hours. Big numbers as expected.
I'll wait for the official stats and it's still a little early for that...and I'm not sure Dana White alone is a reliable source.
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Dana White said 6,5 millions ppv

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

I swear many of the experts here,
you know the smart ones with 8000 posts,
used to tell me I was stupid because I thought Floyd was the PPV draw.

They used to swear he wasn't an attraction, just his opponents.
They had that opinion until fairly recent.

Most people should take a 10 year hiatus talking about Floyd.
Maybe after that time, they'd be able to see past their bias.
He'd be 50 by then.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Dana White said 6,5 millions ppv

Post by crusader »

Rafael's sources telling him that it's well under 6.5 and probably wont break the record
Jay [via mobile]

Over/Under 6 million PPV's last weekend?
Dan Rafael, The Boxing Guy (12:08 PM)

Way under. No official numbers yet but my industry sources said it will not break the record. It may be slightly over 4M but it won't break the record they say. We'll have to wait and see.
Mexi-Box
Welterweight
Posts: 3963
Joined: 24 Jan 2016, 16:19

Re: Dana White said 6,5 millions ppv

Post by Mexi-Box »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:I swear many of the experts here,
you know the smart ones with 8000 posts,
used to tell me I was stupid because I thought Floyd was the PPV draw.

They used to swear he wasn't an attraction, just his opponents.
They had that opinion until fairly recent.

Most people should take a 10 year hiatus talking about Floyd.
Maybe after that time, they'd be able to see past their bias.
He'd be 50 by then.
You are stupid. It's always been a joint effort. When has Mayweather broken a record by himself? What were the Mayweather/Berto numbers?
craigjenkins05
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 477
Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 11:03

Re: Dana White said 6,5 millions ppv

Post by craigjenkins05 »

I always thought when they talked PPV figures they spoke about the US PPV maybe Dana is talking worldwide?
Impractical Poster
Middleweight
Posts: 7636
Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28

Re: Dana White said 6,5 millions ppv

Post by Impractical Poster »

I wouldn't doubt those figures are around that. The fight was huge enough to crash servers in Florida and California. When was the last time something like that happened?
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Dana White said 6,5 millions ppv

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

Mexi-Box wrote:
BAD INTENTIONS wrote:I swear many of the experts here,
you know the smart ones with 8000 posts,
used to tell me I was stupid because I thought Floyd was the PPV draw.

They used to swear he wasn't an attraction, just his opponents.
They had that opinion until fairly recent.

Most people should take a 10 year hiatus talking about Floyd.
Maybe after that time, they'd be able to see past their bias.
He'd be 50 by then.
You are stupid. It's always been a joint effort. When has Mayweather broken a record by himself? What were the Mayweather/Berto numbers?
Joint effort, yes ... but there is someone's star power carrying the event.
Dudes used to say the majority of PPV buys were because of guys like Hatton and Floyd's other opponents.
There was always a reason beyond "Floyd is the most popular fighter".

You don't understand what I'm saying, but you still took the time to insult me. Thanks.
Best Coast
Welterweight
Posts: 3133
Joined: 07 Mar 2016, 22:53

Re: Dana White said 6,5 millions ppv

Post by Best Coast »

Showtime is a MUCH more reliable source than Dana White (who suckered Sports Illustrated into putting Ronda Rousey on their COVER as "The Most Dominant Athlete in the World" :lol: )!!

http://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/id/2 ... egor-fight
Conor McGregor's improbable challenge of Floyd Mayweather was a box-office smash.

The fight reached between 4 million and 5 million pay-per-view sales with an estimated 50 million people watching in the United States alone.

According to preliminary numbers by Showtime PPV, the fight threatens the 4.6 million benchmark set by Mayweather's 2015 fight with Manny Pacquiao. At $99.95 a buy, the fight is tracking to generate more than $450 million in television revenue, much of which will be shared by the two fighters.
Mexi-Box
Welterweight
Posts: 3963
Joined: 24 Jan 2016, 16:19

Re: Dana White said 6,5 millions ppv

Post by Mexi-Box »

Best Coast wrote:Showtime is a MUCH more reliable source than Dana White (who suckered Sports Illustrated into putting Ronda Rousey on their COVER as "The Most Dominant Athlete in the World" :lol: )!!

http://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/id/2 ... egor-fight
Conor McGregor's improbable challenge of Floyd Mayweather was a box-office smash.

The fight reached between 4 million and 5 million pay-per-view sales with an estimated 50 million people watching in the United States alone.

According to preliminary numbers by Showtime PPV, the fight threatens the 4.6 million benchmark set by Mayweather's 2015 fight with Manny Pacquiao. At $99.95 a buy, the fight is tracking to generate more than $450 million in television revenue, much of which will be shared by the two fighters.
Even then, I trust an independent source like Raefal more who says it won't come close to breaking the record.
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Dana White said 6,5 millions ppv

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

Mexi-Box wrote:
Best Coast wrote:Showtime is a MUCH more reliable source than Dana White (who suckered Sports Illustrated into putting Ronda Rousey on their COVER as "The Most Dominant Athlete in the World" :lol: )!!

http://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/id/2 ... egor-fight
Conor McGregor's improbable challenge of Floyd Mayweather was a box-office smash.

The fight reached between 4 million and 5 million pay-per-view sales with an estimated 50 million people watching in the United States alone.

According to preliminary numbers by Showtime PPV, the fight threatens the 4.6 million benchmark set by Mayweather's 2015 fight with Manny Pacquiao. At $99.95 a buy, the fight is tracking to generate more than $450 million in television revenue, much of which will be shared by the two fighters.
Even then, I trust an independent source like Raefal more who says it won't come close to breaking the record.
Independent :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Dana White said 6,5 millions ppv

Post by Ossyrules »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:
Mexi-Box wrote:
BAD INTENTIONS wrote:I swear many of the experts here,
you know the smart ones with 8000 posts,
used to tell me I was stupid because I thought Floyd was the PPV draw.

They used to swear he wasn't an attraction, just his opponents.
They had that opinion until fairly recent.

Most people should take a 10 year hiatus talking about Floyd.
Maybe after that time, they'd be able to see past their bias.
He'd be 50 by then.
You are stupid. It's always been a joint effort. When has Mayweather broken a record by himself? What were the Mayweather/Berto numbers?
Joint effort, yes ... but there is someone's star power carrying the event.
Dudes used to say the majority of PPV buys were because of guys like Hatton and Floyd's other opponents.
There was always a reason beyond "Floyd is the most popular fighter".

You don't understand what I'm saying, but you still took the time to insult me. Thanks.
Mayweather of course has big appeal, but when he does truly big numbers, it is a joint effort. When he has opponents that have big following and big appeal

Hatton, Pacquaio, de la Hoya, canelo, mcgregor
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: Dana White said 6,5 millions ppv

Post by dagilechia »

it's 6,5 milion in the USA or around the world?
greg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5331
Joined: 23 Mar 2007, 07:44

Re: Dana White said 6,5 millions ppv

Post by greg »

..except for an obvious fact that all parties concerned received nice paychecks, I'm still struggling to fathom the significance of these and other PPV numbers.. :witzend:
Mexi-Box
Welterweight
Posts: 3963
Joined: 24 Jan 2016, 16:19

Re: Dana White said 6,5 millions ppv

Post by Mexi-Box »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:
Mexi-Box wrote:
Best Coast wrote:Showtime is a MUCH more reliable source than Dana White (who suckered Sports Illustrated into putting Ronda Rousey on their COVER as "The Most Dominant Athlete in the World" :lol: )!!

http://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/id/2 ... egor-fight
Even then, I trust an independent source like Raefal more who says it won't come close to breaking the record.
Independent :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
When did he start working for Showtime? :KO:
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: Dana White said 6,5 millions ppv

Post by SenorPipino »

Ossyrules wrote:
BAD INTENTIONS wrote:
Mexi-Box wrote: You are stupid. It's always been a joint effort. When has Mayweather broken a record by himself? What were the Mayweather/Berto numbers?
Joint effort, yes ... but there is someone's star power carrying the event.
Dudes used to say the majority of PPV buys were because of guys like Hatton and Floyd's other opponents.
There was always a reason beyond "Floyd is the most popular fighter".

You don't understand what I'm saying, but you still took the time to insult me. Thanks.
Mayweather of course has big appeal, but when he does truly big numbers, it is a joint effort. When he has opponents that have big following and big appeal

Hatton, Pacquaio, de la Hoya, canelo, mcgregor
Why the need to debate ?
Any idiot recognizes that even a superstar like Mayweather will draw better against another star.

Would you spend all day arguing whether Ali was a true box office attraction because his epic closed circuit bouts against Frazier and Foreman outdrew his battles with Rudi Lubbers and Juergen Blin?

Simplicity has never been so obvious.

Mayweather still managed to lure about 500,000 buys for Berto fight. A terrific number for anyone not named Mayweather.

How many buys would Golovkin attract if he fought Berto? Maybe 50,000 on a very slow Saturday night.

He's supposedly some sort of star, yet his PPV numbers are meager.

Golovkin should thank the good lord and all his disciples tghat Canelo Alvarez exists and that he can finally earn a credible payday.

As for Mayweather, quit looking for ridiculous reasons to tear him down. He's only one of---if not THE---the biggest boxing stars of the past generation.

And yes, he's also been the sports biggest attraction. His bulging wallet is testament to that.
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Dana White said 6,5 millions ppv

Post by Ossyrules »

SenorPipino wrote:
Ossyrules wrote:
BAD INTENTIONS wrote: Joint effort, yes ... but there is someone's star power carrying the event.
Dudes used to say the majority of PPV buys were because of guys like Hatton and Floyd's other opponents.
There was always a reason beyond "Floyd is the most popular fighter".

You don't understand what I'm saying, but you still took the time to insult me. Thanks.
Mayweather of course has big appeal, but when he does truly big numbers, it is a joint effort. When he has opponents that have big following and big appeal

Hatton, Pacquaio, de la Hoya, canelo, mcgregor
Why the need to debate ?
Any idiot recognizes that even a superstar like Mayweather will draw better against another star.

Would you spend all day arguing whether Ali was a true box office attraction because his epic closed circuit bouts against Frazier and Foreman outdrew his battles with Rudi Lubbers and Juergen Blin?

Simplicity has never been so obvious.

Mayweather still managed to lure about 500,000 buys for Berto fight. A terrific number for anyone not named Mayweather.

How many buys would Golovkin attract if he fought Berto? Maybe 50,000 on a very slow Saturday night.

He's supposedly some sort of star, yet his PPV numbers are meager.

Golovkin should thank the good lord and all his disciples tghat Canelo Alvarez exists and that he can finally earn a credible payday.

As for Mayweather, quit looking for ridiculous reasons to tear him down. He's only one of---if not THE---the biggest boxing stars of the past generation.

And yes, he's also been the sports biggest attraction. His bulging wallet is testament to that.
If that's a direct reply to me you have your wires crossed. I'm responding to a guy whose said Mayweather carried PPV with his star appeal, but as you rightly point out, it takes 2 to tango to get the truly big numbers.

I'm not tearing him down either don't get emotional
Post Reply