What are ITV thinking?

Richard Fletcher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 16:49

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by Richard Fletcher »

Smith vs Skogland is live on ITV4 next week. They’ve done it back to front. Should have launched with Smith then done the delayed cruiser fight on 16th, with fans hopefully onside.
kbackup408
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1663
Joined: 08 Sep 2016, 12:58

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by kbackup408 »

ScottDetonator wrote:Think it starts at 8.30pm mate.

I've registered but not received an email yet :maybe:
hope so pal, i've opened a can up up long one hour wait haha :clap:
feeb
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 10
Joined: 24 Jan 2012, 14:59

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by feeb »

I'm guessing the deal was cheaper for ITV to not show the less glamourous cards a day later and that's why it isn't shown live on any of the numerous iTV channels they have to offer .As a boxing fan I was looking forward to these fights and I am hoping youtube (by people streaming these themselves) end up streaming these live which has been known with some of the football recently.
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7277
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by Oiky »

Bad do from ITV
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10941
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by ILikeBeer »

I didn't even realise Usyk v Huck was meant to be on ITV. I thought they were just showing the Super Middleweight one, for some reason.

What happened? They didn't screen it live, but you could watch it on Catch Up the next day?
jimb0d
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 616
Joined: 18 Oct 2006, 05:51

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by jimb0d »

Only online the next day.....if you searched for the link to a new .com boxoffice address on the itv hub website.......google didnt find it..........with no promotion/advert on front page...........and watched it in a window or 640 resolution.................crap. Good fight though!
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10941
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by ILikeBeer »

jimb0d wrote:Only online the next day.....if you searched for the link to a new .com boxoffice address on the itv hub website.......google didnt find it..........with no promotion/advert on front page...........and watched it in a window or 640 resolution.................crap. Good fight though!
Yeah, stuff that.

I wouldn't have watched it even if I did know it was possible. :lol:
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by JimJim2009 »

ILikeBeer wrote:
jimb0d wrote:Only online the next day.....if you searched for the link to a new .com boxoffice address on the itv hub website.......google didnt find it..........with no promotion/advert on front page...........and watched it in a window or 640 resolution.................crap. Good fight though!
Yeah, stuff that.

I wouldn't have watched it even if I did know it was possible. :lol:
It's almost like ITV and Mick Hennessy are trying to outdo one another.
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10941
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by ILikeBeer »

Looking forward to a good piss-up on Saturday night though. :TU:
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by lefty »

Richard Fletcher wrote:Smith vs Skogland is live on ITV4 next week. They’ve done it back to front. Should have launched with Smith then done the delayed cruiser fight on 16th, with fans hopefully onside.
I don't get it; why's Callum smith fighting on ITV4 when the likes of Eubank jnr and Groves are on PPV?! Lol. Has Eddie fucked up here or?
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4941
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by rd350lc »

lefty wrote:
Richard Fletcher wrote:Smith vs Skogland is live on ITV4 next week. They’ve done it back to front. Should have launched with Smith then done the delayed cruiser fight on 16th, with fans hopefully onside.
I don't get it; why's Callum smith fighting on ITV4 when the likes of Eubank jnr and Groves are on PPV?! Lol. Has Eddie fucked up here or?
Jnr shouldn't be a ppv fighter , I doubt if Groves will headline a ppv fight unless it is with jnr or Degale .

Callum Smith is definitely not a ppv headline fighter at this stage in his career .

It will be a bit strange tho, him not on a Sky card .
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by lefty »

rd350lc wrote:
lefty wrote:
Richard Fletcher wrote:Smith vs Skogland is live on ITV4 next week. They’ve done it back to front. Should have launched with Smith then done the delayed cruiser fight on 16th, with fans hopefully onside.
I don't get it; why's Callum smith fighting on ITV4 when the likes of Eubank jnr and Groves are on PPV?! Lol. Has Eddie fucked up here or?
Jnr shouldn't be a ppv fighter , I doubt if Groves will headline a ppv fight unless it is with jnr or Degale .

Callum Smith is definitely not a ppv headline fighter at this stage in his career .

It will be a bit strange tho, him not on a Sky card .
Groves vs Cox is ppv :lol:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/boxing/2017/ ... ing-super/
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4941
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by rd350lc »

lefty wrote:
rd350lc wrote:
lefty wrote: I don't get it; why's Callum smith fighting on ITV4 when the likes of Eubank jnr and Groves are on PPV?! Lol. Has Eddie fucked up here or?
Jnr shouldn't be a ppv fighter , I doubt if Groves will headline a ppv fight unless it is with jnr or Degale .

Callum Smith is definitely not a ppv headline fighter at this stage in his career .

It will be a bit strange tho, him not on a Sky card .
Groves vs Cox is ppv :lol:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/boxing/2017/ ... ing-super/
But it isn't really tho is it .
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Got to be financial. Always costs a lot less on delay.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Got to be financial. Always costs a lot less on delay.
But they were selling it as a package.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by lefty »

rd350lc wrote:
lefty wrote:
rd350lc wrote:
Jnr shouldn't be a ppv fighter , I doubt if Groves will headline a ppv fight unless it is with jnr or Degale .

Callum Smith is definitely not a ppv headline fighter at this stage in his career .

It will be a bit strange tho, him not on a Sky card .
Groves vs Cox is ppv :lol:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/boxing/2017/ ... ing-super/
But it isn't really tho is it .
You've lost me, what do you mean it isn't? Groves and Eubank jnr are fighting on separate PPV events. Groves in September and Eubank in October.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by lefty »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Got to be financial. Always costs a lot less on delay.
The sad reality is I think they thought they'd get better viewing figures for an old Clint Eastwood film, than they would showing an unknown Ukrainian and German (which may be true).
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

lefty wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Got to be financial. Always costs a lot less on delay.
The sad reality is I think they thought they'd get better viewing figures for an old Clint Eastwood film, than they would showing an unknown Ukrainian and German (which may be true).
Its probably true.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by lefty »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
lefty wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Got to be financial. Always costs a lot less on delay.
The sad reality is I think they thought they'd get better viewing figures for an old Clint Eastwood film, than they would showing an unknown Ukrainian and German (which may be true).
Its probably true.
:cry:
cutsman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 469
Joined: 17 Jun 2012, 06:39

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by cutsman »

lefty wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Got to be financial. Always costs a lot less on delay.
The sad reality is I think they thought they'd get better viewing figures for an old Clint Eastwood film, than they would showing an unknown Ukrainian and German (which may be true).

I love Clint Eastwood films. When is this on?
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4941
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by rd350lc »

lefty wrote:
rd350lc wrote:
But it isn't really tho is it .
You've lost me, what do you mean it isn't? Groves and Eubank jnr are fighting on separate PPV events. Groves in September and Eubank in October.
Alright , I didn't realize ITV had made the fight with Cox a ppv , they are not ppv worthy fights and will hardly break box office records.

Just like the last two jnr fights . It is a bit of a joke really . In my mind ppv's should be reserved for massive events of which these are not .

I'd be interested to know exactly how many buys the last fight against Abraham actually got ?

Itv won't be in this for the long haul
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7277
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by Oiky »

Shambles
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10941
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by ILikeBeer »

cutsman wrote: I love Clint Eastwood films. When is this on?
:lol:
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10941
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by ILikeBeer »

rd350lc wrote:
Alright , I didn't realize ITV had made the fight with Cox a ppv , they are not ppv worthy fights and will hardly break box office records.

Just like the last two jnr fights . It is a bit of a joke really . In my mind ppv's should be reserved for massive events of which these are not .

I'd be interested to know exactly how many buys the last fight against Abraham actually got ?

Itv won't be in this for the long haul
PPV is becoming used as a marketing tool these days. Or at least they are on Sky. (Which is what I'm sure ITV are trying to replicate.) It's another way of conning casuals.

A lot of people assume, as you say, that PPV is saved only for the very biggest fights. By that logic, people assume that something that's on PPV is automatically a big fight.
kbackup408
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1663
Joined: 08 Sep 2016, 12:58

Re: What are ITV thinking?

Post by kbackup408 »

ILikeBeer wrote:
rd350lc wrote:
Alright , I didn't realize ITV had made the fight with Cox a ppv , they are not ppv worthy fights and will hardly break box office records.

Just like the last two jnr fights . It is a bit of a joke really . In my mind ppv's should be reserved for massive events of which these are not .

I'd be interested to know exactly how many buys the last fight against Abraham actually got ?

Itv won't be in this for the long haul
PPV is becoming used as a marketing tool these days. Or at least they are on Sky. (Which is what I'm sure ITV are trying to replicate.) It's another way of conning casuals.

A lot of people assume, as you say, that PPV is saved only for the very biggest fights. By that logic, people assume that something that's on PPV is automatically a big fight.
Aye pal, PPV is the biggest marketing tool after social media. I only buy a PPV if I genuinely don't know what the result will be by that logic I WILL NOT be purchasing AJ/Pulev
Post Reply