HW #2 ?

HW #2 ?

Wilder
28
62%
Ortiz
7
16%
Parker
4
9%
Pulev
4
9%
Whyte
2
4%
 
Total votes: 45

man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: HW #2 ?

Post by man »

Ossyrules wrote:
Kalan wrote:
RScarf1 wrote:So you think Mike Tyson in his prime would lose to Tyson Fury? Mike Tyson beat guys taller than him. He was probably shorter than everyone or almost everyone he fought. Tony Tucker was a contender too back then even after he lost to Tyson by decision. A lot of depth in the division in those days. Fury would have a height advantage on all of them, but would that be enough to overcome their skills? Fury would probably have lost to Klitschko in the rematch and Joshua if he fought him.
Damned right he would lose... Tyson was too small and weak for even Evander Holyfield, Buster Douglas, and Lennox Lewis... They boxed the piss out of Mike because he didn't box that well... He style was walking straight in and eating punches.. When he ate their's He went down and out.. EAT THIS Mike!

As far as Fury losing to Klitschko in the rematch??? ... I doubt it -- and sometimes you get one bite at the apple... Joshua will probably get his bite sometime in the future -- that is if Fury ever rehabs from all his mental, emotional, and addiction health issues...
Reading boxrec records again with no context kalan

Mike was on the decline vs buster
Past it vs Holyfield
Completely shot vs lewis

It's a terrible base for an argument.

Mike Tyson knocks out tyson fury badly
one thing: mike was distracted but
still very good versus buster. for me
that night was the rare event when
a fighter got bigger than he was. the
buster douglas of that night gives
many ATGs a very hard night and
not all of them would win.

he had tremendous talent, but lacked
work ethic, which funny enough, mike
always had- at least enough to show
up in shape.
Last edited by man on 08 Oct 2017, 15:01, edited 1 time in total.
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: HW #2 ?

Post by dagilechia »

If someone ranks Dillian Whyte as HW #2 then the same person must admit that it's the worst division out there at the moment.
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: HW #2 ?

Post by ValMar »

dagilechia wrote:If someone ranks Dillian Whyte as HW #2 then the same person must admit that it's the worst division out there at the moment.
First of all, I opened this post, but I did not vote. Anyway, you have to admit that Whyte's style is very attractive, and this is good for boxing, generally speaking.
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: HW #2 ?

Post by HomicideHenry »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:No thank you.
Yeah cus you know that Weaver would tell the truth, that he couldn't have beaten Fury or Klitschko.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: HW #2 ?

Post by Tanzio »

Heretic wrote:
ValMar wrote:
Heretic wrote:
Usyk does not have the power to beat Joshua. He would get walked down against the bigger and stronger man.

He should clean out cruiser and maybe then cash out in few final fights in HW.
I agree that Usyk has not enough power to KO Joshua, but if he is able to box cleverly, he might win by decision.
I think Usyk could out box him for some time but would get caught eventually. Bit like what GGG did to Brook.
. . . or, a bit like the way Huck caught him, with more devastating result, of course.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: HW #2 ?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

HomicideHenry wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:No thank you.
Yeah cus you know that Weaver would tell the truth, that he couldn't have beaten Fury or Klitschko.
No, because I would never listen to your show. I'd be more interested what he thinks of you telling him that fury would make him cry like a bitch. Let me know what he says about that. :TU:
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: HW #2 ?

Post by HomicideHenry »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
HomicideHenry wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:No thank you.
Yeah cus you know that Weaver would tell the truth, that he couldn't have beaten Fury or Klitschko.
No, because I would never listen to your show. I'd be more interested what he thinks of you telling him that fury would make him cry like a bitch. Let me know what he says about that. :TU:
LMFAOOOOO Rubin Hollywood Williams agreed with me that there's no way Weaver could beat Fury or Klitschko, etc so I'd rather take a former champions word than yours.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: HW #2 ?

Post by crusader »

Steve Cunningham is a far better and more accomplished boxer than Williams; did you give his word that kind of respect?
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: HW #2 ?

Post by HomicideHenry »

crusader wrote:Steve Cunningham is a far better and more accomplished boxer than Williams; did you give his word that kind of respect?
Cunningham is a mentally and emotionally fragile man who has never been the same since Fury. The losses have piled up. Seems all that character he allegedly had was mostly a facade. He's turned into an incredibly bitter and resentful man.

As for Rubin Williams, he may not be as good or great as some, but he's a man worthy of respect and he's got a huge IQ on the business. He sounds as knowledgeable as any trainer or insider in the business.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: HW #2 ?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

HomicideHenry wrote:
crusader wrote:Steve Cunningham is a far better and more accomplished boxer than Williams; did you give his word that kind of respect?
Cunningham is a mentally and emotionally fragile man who has never been the same since Fury. The losses have piled up. Seems all that character he allegedly had was mostly a facade. He's turned into an incredibly bitter and resentful man.

As for Rubin Williams, he may not be as good or great as some, but he's a man worthy of respect and he's got a huge IQ on the business. He sounds as knowledgeable as any trainer or insider in the business.
You're a piece of dogshit.
RScarf1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1418
Joined: 18 Aug 2005, 22:31

Re: HW #2 ?

Post by RScarf1 »

Weaver would have beaten Fury and I don't care if even Weaver doesn't believe it.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: HW #2 ?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

RScarf1 wrote:Weaver would have beaten Fury and I don't care if even Weaver doesn't believe it.
Yup, Rubin is hilarious and he knows the current sport better than most former fighters. He also thinks ezzard Charles was nothing special.
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: HW #2 ?

Post by ValMar »

RScarf1 wrote:Weaver would have beaten Fury and I don't care if even Weaver doesn't believe it.
I don't think so........
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: HW #2 ?

Post by Tomasino »

HomicideHenry wrote:
crusader wrote:Steve Cunningham is a far better and more accomplished boxer than Williams; did you give his word that kind of respect?
Cunningham is a mentally and emotionally fragile man who has never been the same since Fury. The losses have piled up. Seems all that character he allegedly had was mostly a facade. He's turned into an incredibly bitter and resentful man.

As for Rubin Williams, he may not be as good or great as some, but he's a man worthy of respect and he's got a huge IQ on the business. He sounds as knowledgeable as any trainer or insider in the business.

How can you even post this? A facade? Why do you feel the need to insult the man?
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: HW #2 ?

Post by HomicideHenry »

Tomasino wrote:
HomicideHenry wrote:
crusader wrote:Steve Cunningham is a far better and more accomplished boxer than Williams; did you give his word that kind of respect?
Cunningham is a mentally and emotionally fragile man who has never been the same since Fury. The losses have piled up. Seems all that character he allegedly had was mostly a facade. He's turned into an incredibly bitter and resentful man.

As for Rubin Williams, he may not be as good or great as some, but he's a man worthy of respect and he's got a huge IQ on the business. He sounds as knowledgeable as any trainer or insider in the business.

How can you even post this? A facade? Why do you feel the need to insult the man?
#1- Has he been the same since? No.
#2- Have the losses piled up since? Yes.
#3- Does he seem bitter and less humble since? Yes.

I said nothing wrong.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: HW #2 ?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Not surprising a loser like you sees nothing wrong with denigrating a man that provided you the freedom to be a worthless bum. There is gum on the bottom of shoes worth more than your life.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: HW #2 ?

Post by Tanzio »

HomicideHenry wrote:
Tomasino wrote:
HomicideHenry wrote:
Cunningham is a mentally and emotionally fragile man who has never been the same since Fury. The losses have piled up. Seems all that character he allegedly had was mostly a facade. He's turned into an incredibly bitter and resentful man.

As for Rubin Williams, he may not be as good or great as some, but he's a man worthy of respect and he's got a huge IQ on the business. He sounds as knowledgeable as any trainer or insider in the business.

How can you even post this? A facade? Why do you feel the need to insult the man?
#1- Has he been the same since? No.
#2- Have the losses piled up since? Yes.
#3- Does he seem bitter and less humble since? Yes.

I said nothing wrong.
Don't take this wrong HH, it is meant to be constructive input, given your relatively recent activity on here it is clear that you are considerably more "emotionally fragile" than Cunningham. :maybe:
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: HW #2 ?

Post by Tomasino »

HomicideHenry wrote:
Tomasino wrote:
HomicideHenry wrote:
Cunningham is a mentally and emotionally fragile man who has never been the same since Fury. The losses have piled up. Seems all that character he allegedly had was mostly a facade. He's turned into an incredibly bitter and resentful man.

As for Rubin Williams, he may not be as good or great as some, but he's a man worthy of respect and he's got a huge IQ on the business. He sounds as knowledgeable as any trainer or insider in the business.

How can you even post this? A facade? Why do you feel the need to insult the man?
#1- Has he been the same since? No.
#2- Have the losses piled up since? Yes.
#3- Does he seem bitter and less humble since? Yes.

I said nothing wrong.
You are truly disgusting Rufus.
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: HW #2 ?

Post by ValMar »

Tomasino wrote:
HomicideHenry wrote:
Tomasino wrote:

How can you even post this? A facade? Why do you feel the need to insult the man?
#1- Has he been the same since? No.
#2- Have the losses piled up since? Yes.
#3- Does he seem bitter and less humble since? Yes.

I said nothing wrong.
You are truly disgusting Rufus.
Off topic, again......
Who is the recent HW #2 ?
Post Reply