Loma vs Rigo

Loma vs Rigo at 130

Loma
23
88%
Rigo
3
12%
 
Total votes: 26

Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Loma vs Rigo

Post by Ossyrules »

gilgamesh wrote:Lomachenko will win a lopsided fight. Both are defensive masters, it's a wash there. Lomachenko is a FAR more dynamic offensive fighter, and when you add in the fact that he's the slightly bigger man naturally, and the fact that he's the younger man. He's got everything going for him coming into this.

He'll either stop Rigo later on in the fight or win a clear Unanimous decision with scores of like 118-108 or something like that.
I think you're underestimating rigo a bit gil
Jip
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2518
Joined: 04 Nov 2016, 03:30

Re: Loma vs Rigo

Post by Jip »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Jip wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Yes
Great news. You got loma i guess.
Yeah, no blowout though. Rigo will be way up for this.
This big bang at the end truly makes this year special. The best boxing year since 2000. Cant remember of a year with such good match ups.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Loma vs Rigo

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

I don't know about that, way better than last year.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Loma vs Rigo

Post by lefty »

gilgamesh wrote:Lomachenko will win a lopsided fight. Both are defensive masters, it's a wash there. Lomachenko is a FAR more dynamic offensive fighter, and when you add in the fact that he's the slightly bigger man naturally, and the fact that he's the younger man. He's got everything going for him coming into this.

He'll either stop Rigo later on in the fight or win a clear Unanimous decision with scores of like 118-108 or something like that.
Slightly bigger? Lol
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7255
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: Loma vs Rigo

Post by Oiky »

Rigo is a very good fighter :box:

But he can't hang with Loma :shame:
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Loma vs Rigo

Post by Badhusker »

I really wish the fight was on a more even playing field. Its not hard to figure out who was throwing a wrench in the cogs stopping a fight between the two of them at 126. Arum wants Loma to have the advantages so he doesn't risk Loma losing like he did Donaire. My theory anyway...
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46472
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Loma vs Rigo

Post by gilgamesh »

Ossyrules wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:Lomachenko will win a lopsided fight. Both are defensive masters, it's a wash there. Lomachenko is a FAR more dynamic offensive fighter, and when you add in the fact that he's the slightly bigger man naturally, and the fact that he's the younger man. He's got everything going for him coming into this.

He'll either stop Rigo later on in the fight or win a clear Unanimous decision with scores of like 118-108 or something like that.
I think you're underestimating rigo a bit gil
We'll see. I know how good he is, I also know he's 35 years old, and the naturally smaller man. Not to mention facing a fighter who's possibly even faster, and more skilled than him.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46472
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Loma vs Rigo

Post by gilgamesh »

lefty wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:Lomachenko will win a lopsided fight. Both are defensive masters, it's a wash there. Lomachenko is a FAR more dynamic offensive fighter, and when you add in the fact that he's the slightly bigger man naturally, and the fact that he's the younger man. He's got everything going for him coming into this.

He'll either stop Rigo later on in the fight or win a clear Unanimous decision with scores of like 118-108 or something like that.
Slightly bigger? Lol
Yes slightly bigger. I don't consider the distance between 122 pounds and 130 pounds to be a million miles. Just because it's 2 weight classes apart it shouldn't dillude your own comprehension that it's a mere 8 pounds, and Lomachenko was fighting at 126 not too terribly long ago. It's not like he's some giant.
p4p1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5854
Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 07:43

Re: Loma vs Rigo

Post by p4p1 »

I wouldn't say there's a massive weight difference between them. It's not like Loma is some dude who cuts 15lbs to make weight.

I can't think of a fight were the fighters are this highly skilled, I think Lomas pressure will be the difference but I expect it to be fought on a level(skill wise) we may not have seen before.
IKSRTFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4758
Joined: 09 Dec 2007, 17:14

Re: Loma vs Rigo

Post by IKSRTFO »

lefty wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:Lomachenko will win a lopsided fight. Both are defensive masters, it's a wash there. Lomachenko is a FAR more dynamic offensive fighter, and when you add in the fact that he's the slightly bigger man naturally, and the fact that he's the younger man. He's got everything going for him coming into this.

He'll either stop Rigo later on in the fight or win a clear Unanimous decision with scores of like 118-108 or something like that.
Slightly bigger? Lol
Rigo is like 5'4 in heels and 122 with change in his pockets
IKSRTFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4758
Joined: 09 Dec 2007, 17:14

Re: Loma vs Rigo

Post by IKSRTFO »

gilgamesh wrote:
lefty wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:Lomachenko will win a lopsided fight. Both are defensive masters, it's a wash there. Lomachenko is a FAR more dynamic offensive fighter, and when you add in the fact that he's the slightly bigger man naturally, and the fact that he's the younger man. He's got everything going for him coming into this.

He'll either stop Rigo later on in the fight or win a clear Unanimous decision with scores of like 118-108 or something like that.
Slightly bigger? Lol
Yes slightly bigger. I don't consider the distance between 122 pounds and 130 pounds to be a million miles. Just because it's 2 weight classes apart it shouldn't dillude your own comprehension that it's a mere 8 pounds, and Lomachenko was fighting at 126 not too terribly long ago. It's not like he's some giant.
8lbs from 122 to 130 looks and feels much different than 160 to 168. Just ask Gonzalez
Best Coast
Welterweight
Posts: 3133
Joined: 07 Mar 2016, 22:53

Re: Loma vs Rigo

Post by Best Coast »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Jip wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Yes
Great news. You got loma i guess.
Yeah, no blowout though. Rigo will be way up for this.
I wish I could agree with you on that one since I will be rooting hard for Rigo! Unfortunately I believe the 130# limit will be too favorable for Loma and dont think Rigo has much chance of victory at that unfavorably high weight. The only time Rigo ever fought over 122 pounds was back in 2009...

Also, consider he will be 37 in a few weeks. Inactivity wont help either. The one-round fiasco vs faker Flores meant nothing and his quick blowout of Dickens gives Rigo only 3 rounds of actual fighting in the past 2 years.

If Rigondeaux pulls this one off, I'll see it as a major upset!!
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Loma vs Rigo

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

p4p1 wrote:I wouldn't say there's a massive weight difference between them. It's not like Loma is some dude who cuts 15lbs to make weight.

I can't think of a fight were the fighters are this highly skilled, I think Lomas pressure will be the difference but I expect it to be fought on a level(skill wise) we may not have seen before.
All the combinations of Leonard, haglee, Duran & hearns.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46472
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Loma vs Rigo

Post by gilgamesh »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
p4p1 wrote:I wouldn't say there's a massive weight difference between them. It's not like Loma is some dude who cuts 15lbs to make weight.

I can't think of a fight were the fighters are this highly skilled, I think Lomas pressure will be the difference but I expect it to be fought on a level(skill wise) we may not have seen before.
All the combinations of Leonard, haglee, Duran & hearns.
Yep. I almost said that a second ago in Jip's "We've never seen this kinda skill before" claim.

I'm like...ummm hello? Leonard vs Hearns!

But yeah you're right, any combination of the 4 would've been Elite skill.

Wilfred Benitez fought all of them except Hagler as well, and he was fantastically skilled as well.
p4p1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5854
Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 07:43

Re: Loma vs Rigo

Post by p4p1 »

gilgamesh wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
p4p1 wrote:I wouldn't say there's a massive weight difference between them. It's not like Loma is some dude who cuts 15lbs to make weight.

I can't think of a fight were the fighters are this highly skilled, I think Lomas pressure will be the difference but I expect it to be fought on a level(skill wise) we may not have seen before.
All the combinations of Leonard, haglee, Duran & hearns.
Yep. I almost said that a second ago in Jip's "We've never seen this kinda skill before" claim.

I'm like...ummm hello? Leonard vs Hearns!

But yeah you're right, any combination of the 4 would've been Elite skill.

Wilfred Benitez fought all of them except Hagler as well, and he was fantastically skilled as well.
Fair point.
apollo creed
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7254
Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28

Re: Loma vs Rigo

Post by apollo creed »

Rigo is gonna fight in a negative way like FMJ, trying to pot shot his opponent. Unfortunately for Rigo , Loma has tremendous footwork and control of distance. Great boxing spectacle. :yay:
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Loma vs Rigo

Post by Tanzio »

Jip wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Jip wrote:
Great news. You got loma i guess.
Yeah, no blowout though. Rigo will be way up for this.
This big bang at the end truly makes this year special. The best boxing year since 2000. Cant remember of a year with such good match ups.
I know this is shocking, Jiplan, but I actually agree with you. :TU:
MaxiBoxc
Welterweight
Posts: 111
Joined: 08 Mar 2016, 15:58

Re: Loma vs Rigo

Post by MaxiBoxc »

gilgamesh wrote:
Ossyrules wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:Lomachenko will win a lopsided fight. Both are defensive masters, it's a wash there. Lomachenko is a FAR more dynamic offensive fighter, and when you add in the fact that he's the slightly bigger man naturally, and the fact that he's the younger man. He's got everything going for him coming into this.

He'll either stop Rigo later on in the fight or win a clear Unanimous decision with scores of like 118-108 or something like that.
I think you're underestimating rigo a bit gil
We'll see. I know how good he is, I also know he's 35 years old, and the naturally smaller man. Not to mention facing a fighter who's possibly even faster, and more skilled than him.
Rigo will be 37 at the moment of their fight.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46472
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Loma vs Rigo

Post by gilgamesh »

MaxiBoxc wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Ossyrules wrote:
I think you're underestimating rigo a bit gil
We'll see. I know how good he is, I also know he's 35 years old, and the naturally smaller man. Not to mention facing a fighter who's possibly even faster, and more skilled than him.
Rigo will be 37 at the moment of their fight.
Damn really? It's even worse than I thought then.
Blodhemn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2848
Joined: 04 Jun 2006, 20:30

Re: Loma vs Rigo

Post by Blodhemn »

If one of them happened to toy with the other, that'd be some pretty unheard of significance and be less about size advantages. Rigo still has the reach. :lol: Crazy fight. Crazy year of boxing.
Post Reply