Counter-puncher wrote:A very wise poster on here suggested to you that may be the casehandsofstone wrote:but Golovkin's footwork again put Canelo under pressure constantly![]()
Don't be that guy
nobody likes that guy
Counter-puncher wrote:A very wise poster on here suggested to you that may be the casehandsofstone wrote:but Golovkin's footwork again put Canelo under pressure constantly![]()
crusader wrote:Punch away

You're right, some fights are draws. Not explaining myself very well. Just wondering if there could be an improvement on the 3 Judges system.tobyh5 wrote:Some fights should be a draw. We do not need to avoid draws but we need to avoid incorrect decisions.King Tubby wrote:I'm not talking about 'fixing', toby. I assume the governing bodies are not bent and have faith in the ability of their judges. This fight would have been 345/ 339 Canelo. Just wondering how to avoid draws.
I think we will always have problems in any sports where the result can be determined by a human decision. All alternatives which I can think of are open to the same problems.King Tubby wrote:You're right, some fights are draws. Not explaining myself very well. Just wondering if there could be an improvement on the 3 Judges system.tobyh5 wrote:Some fights should be a draw. We do not need to avoid draws but we need to avoid incorrect decisions.King Tubby wrote:I'm not talking about 'fixing', toby. I assume the governing bodies are not bent and have faith in the ability of their judges. This fight would have been 345/ 339 Canelo. Just wondering how to avoid draws.
5 judges...2 watching out of the arena on screens, no commentary.King Tubby wrote:I'm not talking about 'fixing', toby. I assume the governing bodies are not bent and have faith in the ability of their judges. This fight would have been 345/ 339 Canelo. Just wondering how to avoid draws.