Tyson Fury charged by UKad

stellar
Super Lightweight
Posts: 247
Joined: 19 Nov 2016, 07:00

Re: Tyson Fury charged by UKad

Post by stellar »

Where do we live in 16 centuries?wtf :brick: :witzend:
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Tyson Fury charged by UKad

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Why is it taking so long to get some clarity? Crazy.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17099
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Tyson Fury charged by UKad

Post by keithmoonhangover »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Why is it taking so long to get some clarity? Crazy.
Fury has to agree a date for the hearing. If he doesn't, it doesn't happen. If he waits long enough, it will just go away. That's what I was told.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Tyson Fury charged by UKad

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Why is it taking so long to get some clarity? Crazy.
Fury has to agree a date for the hearing. If he doesn't, it doesn't happen. If he waits long enough, it will just go away. That's what I was told.

Thats a great system right there.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32959
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Tyson Fury charged by UKad

Post by Boxerbeetle »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Why is it taking so long to get some clarity? Crazy.
Fury has to agree a date for the hearing. If he doesn't, it doesn't happen. If he waits long enough, it will just go away. That's what I was told.
How would it go away though?
Post Reply