Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

apollo creed
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7254
Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28

Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

Post by apollo creed »

Ward was a master of his game. He beat top notch fighters at the peak of their game like Kessler, Abraham, Froch, Dawson and Kovalev. Ward has retired like a true king from this sport! Undefeated, young, healthy and after he beat the man from his division! Well done champ! :clap: :TU: :TU: :salut:
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

Post by Ossyrules »

apollo creed wrote:Ward was a master of his game. He beat top notch fighters at the peak of their game like Kessler, Abraham, Froch, Dawson and Kovalev. Ward has retired like a true king from this sport! Undefeated, young, healthy and after he beat the man from his division! Well done champ! :clap: :TU: :TU: :salut:
One of the better fighters of his time group, not sure if he's one of the most complete all time like the title alludes too. Next to Ray Leonard and hagler etc he really isn't all that complete

Was abraham and Dawson at the top of their game when he beat them? Nothing against your general post but not sure about some of the detail
soldieroffortune2
Lightweight
Posts: 35
Joined: 20 Sep 2017, 05:43

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

Post by soldieroffortune2 »

Ossyrules wrote:
Was abraham and Dawson at the top of their game when he beat them? Nothing against your general post but not sure about some of the detail
If Abraham wasn't at his peak he was very close to it. Dawson was drained though.
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxi

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

Every fight was either UD or KO.
What can be said about that?
He always had every judge paid off despite being a ZERO draw.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I was never a Ward fan until the Kessler fight.
Kessler was a top fighter and Ward clearly a level higher.
IMO, he looked more impressive than Calzaghe two years earlier.

Then came the hate.
Ward went from being ignored to the #1 enemy of the sport.
Dirty. Boring. Cheater. Dull.
All from fans who couldn't get enough of:
Mayorga, Mayweather, Broner, Fury, McGegregor ... and other WWE character style clowns.

Not one judge even scored a fight a draw.
For a non-draw. Against guys who could have been/or were big draws.
Amazing. :bow: :bow: :bow:
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

Post by man »

apollo creed wrote:Ward was a master of his game. He beat top notch fighters at the peak of their game like Kessler, Abraham, Froch, Dawson and Kovalev. Ward has retired like a true king from this sport! Undefeated, young, healthy and after he beat the man from his division! Well done champ! :clap: :TU: :TU: :salut:
weird career though. out of business for years
in between. yes, good names on his record, but
then again by far not a top notch resume. i could
have written the exact same thing about david haye.

i for one do like both fighters, but have no respect
for their diva like approach to boxing, including
their premature retirement schemes.

regarding ward. i respect his ability in the ring and
especially his adaptive skills. but it is the first time
in my opinion that the p4p top boxer ends his career
with a KO by low blow.
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

Post by Ossyrules »

soldieroffortune2 wrote:
Ossyrules wrote:
Was abraham and Dawson at the top of their game when he beat them? Nothing against your general post but not sure about some of the detail
If Abraham wasn't at his peak he was very close to it. Dawson was drained though.
I disagree really. He was getting outboxed by Taylor before late ko, he got outboxed by Dirrell by getting himself dq'd, he got schooled by Froch who was really the type to put on clinics. Then ward picked him up

Abraham was a better force at 160 imo. At 168 he got beat by good operators.

If abrahams name is listed as an achievement for ward then it suggests his record is thin on opponents
RScarf1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1418
Joined: 18 Aug 2005, 22:31

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

Post by RScarf1 »

One of the writers on Fight Hype claims that there is racism against African-American boxers such as Ward. I did not see that at all for Ward. I see that he got preferential treatment and he always got unanimous decisions whenever a fight went the distance. The networks (HBO, ESPN) were touting him as the No. 1 pound for pound boxer. They tried to sell us Ward, but the public was not buying. Most of the people commenting on Fight Hype are huge Ward fans and they were commenting positively about his career. Only a few made the criticisms such as I have made and others here on the boxrec forum.
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

Post by Ossyrules »

RScarf1 wrote:One of the writers on Fight Hype claims that there is racism against African-American boxers such as Ward. I did not see that at all for Ward. I see that he got preferential treatment and he always got unanimous decisions whenever a fight went the distance. The networks (HBO, ESPN) were touting him as the No. 1 pound for pound boxer. They tried to sell us Ward, but the public was not buying. Most of the people commenting on Fight Hype are huge Ward fans and they were commenting positively about his career. Only a few made the criticisms such as I have made and others here on the boxrec forum.
Racism is pretty unfair. African Americans have provided many great warriors that are loved. Throughout history

In England, Joshua, frank Bruno, Nigel Benn were just about as popular as anyone we have had.

Don't agree with that about ward
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxi

Post by Ossyrules »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Every fight was either UD or KO.
What can be said about that?
He always had every judge paid off despite being a ZERO draw.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I was never a Ward fan until the Kessler fight.
Kessler was a top fighter and Ward clearly a level higher.
IMO, he looked more impressive than Calzaghe two years earlier.

Then came the hate.
Ward went from being ignored to the #1 enemy of the sport.
Dirty. Boring. Cheater. Dull.
All from fans who couldn't get enough of:
Mayorga, Mayweather, Broner, Fury, McGegregor ... and other WWE character style clowns.

Not one judge even scored a fight a draw.
For a non-draw. Against guys who could have been/or were big draws.
Amazing. :bow: :bow: :bow:
Dirty and cheating overlap.

Boring and dull are the same thing.

theres no doubting wards ability though
RScarf1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1418
Joined: 18 Aug 2005, 22:31

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

Post by RScarf1 »

Ossyrules wrote:
RScarf1 wrote:One of the writers on Fight Hype claims that there is racism against African-American boxers such as Ward. I did not see that at all for Ward. I see that he got preferential treatment and he always got unanimous decisions whenever a fight went the distance. The networks (HBO, ESPN) were touting him as the No. 1 pound for pound boxer. They tried to sell us Ward, but the public was not buying. Most of the people commenting on Fight Hype are huge Ward fans and they were commenting positively about his career. Only a few made the criticisms such as I have made and others here on the boxrec forum.
Racism is pretty unfair. African Americans have provided many great warriors that are loved. Throughout history

In England, Joshua, frank Bruno, Nigel Benn were just about as popular as anyone we have had.

Don't agree with that about ward
I understand. This Fight Hype writer constantly writes about how Golovkin and Lomachenko are treated by the media compared to Crawford and Ward. Crawford was not getting the same attention until he beat Indongo and unified all the titles. Ward was treated great by the TV networks and I think he got his share of attention from journalists. The writer felt that Golovkin vs. Canelo should have been a 114-114 draw, so he's not a Golovkin fan. I feel that the attention that Golovkin and Lomachenko receive is deserved. A few readers of Fight Hype have criticized this writer, but most have not and are fans of the writer because they are the type of biased people that go on Fight Hype. It is not racism as to why Golovkin and Lomachenko get more love from the media. It is because their fighting styles are better to watch than Ward. Crawford just needs to fight better boxers and he will get the attention and he is arguably the best pound for pound boxer right now.
apollo creed
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7254
Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

Post by apollo creed »

I have Ward above Floyd in terms of arsenal of skills and legit threats-prime strong opponents. Ward ain't cherrypicked his opponents and he fought the most dangerous fighters from his division/s at the top of their game. :TU:
caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

Post by caldo2025 »

Boy talk about a fighter doing it right. I was never an Andre Ward fan most of his career but when he KO'd Kovalev, it proved me wrong on every level about this guy. That was shocking and there's no way I could argue any other way but to say that he's a "great" and belongs in the discussion for top 20 fighters in history.

Andre is unlike these other great fighters that only retire to take a few years off before coming back. It doesn't appear he's doing this to avoid mandatory defenses. I think he's going to stay retired and good for him.
soldieroffortune2
Lightweight
Posts: 35
Joined: 20 Sep 2017, 05:43

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

Post by soldieroffortune2 »

Ossyrules wrote:
I disagree really. He was getting outboxed by Taylor before late ko, he got outboxed by Dirrell by getting himself dq'd, he got schooled by Froch who was really the type to put on clinics. Then ward picked him up

Abraham was a better force at 160 imo. At 168 he got beat by good operators.
He was bigger force at 160 as he was fighting inferior competition. He was still near his peak it's just his level was found when he went to 168.
Kilsby
Cruiserweight
Posts: 467
Joined: 09 Sep 2010, 08:52

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

Post by Kilsby »

Great fighter. Never beat & recognised No.1 in two divisions. :TU:
apollo creed
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7254
Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

Post by apollo creed »

soldieroffortune2 wrote:
Ossyrules wrote:
I disagree really. He was getting outboxed by Taylor before late ko, he got outboxed by Dirrell by getting himself dq'd, he got schooled by Froch who was really the type to put on clinics. Then ward picked him up

Abraham was a better force at 160 imo. At 168 he got beat by good operators.
He was bigger force at 160 as he was fighting inferior competition. He was still near his peak it's just his level was found when he went to 168.
:TU:
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

Post by boxing_rocks »

Ward is a dirty spoiler. Barely anybody wanted to watch him fight. A complete boxer who doesn't have a correct punching technique but slaps instead??? LOL
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

Post by Stuarty »

If he was one of the most complete fighters ever then surely he'd be better to watch :maybe: I enjoyed watching Floyd more than Ward!
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

apollo creed wrote:I have Ward above Floyd in terms of arsenal of skills and legit threats-prime strong opponents. Ward ain't cherrypicked his opponents and he fought the most dangerous fighters from his division/s at the top of their game. :TU:
Well, that is ridiculous.
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

Post by Ossyrules »

soldieroffortune2 wrote:
Ossyrules wrote:
I disagree really. He was getting outboxed by Taylor before late ko, he got outboxed by Dirrell by getting himself dq'd, he got schooled by Froch who was really the type to put on clinics. Then ward picked him up

Abraham was a better force at 160 imo. At 168 he got beat by good operators.
He was bigger force at 160 as he was fighting inferior competition. He was still near his peak it's just his level was found when he went to 168.

Fair points mate
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

Post by Ossyrules »

caldo2025 wrote:Boy talk about a fighter doing it right. I was never an Andre Ward fan most of his career but when he KO'd Kovalev, it proved me wrong on every level about this guy. That was shocking and there's no way I could argue any other way but to say that he's a "great" and belongs in the discussion for top 20 fighters in history.

Andre is unlike these other great fighters that only retire to take a few years off before coming back. It doesn't appear he's doing this to avoid mandatory defenses. I think he's going to stay retired and good for him.
His record is far far too light to be in the top 20 all time. That's jip level sensationalism
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

He's top 100, top 3 at super middle. Great career, top 20 or over floyd, or Manny is laughable.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

Post by Kalan »

Ward is a piece of shiit... a cheating bastard who's running from a very tough division that would give him a number of bad losses... Jay Z lost a fortune on this boy who won by hook or by crook -- so the public never supported Ward because they knew he was a dirt bag cheat.
Kilsby
Cruiserweight
Posts: 467
Joined: 09 Sep 2010, 08:52

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

Post by Kilsby »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:He's top 100, top 3 at super middle. Great career, top 20 or over floyd, or Manny is laughable.
I'd agree hes in the top 2 at super-middleweight. Right behind Joe Calzaghe and it would have made a nice little match-up.

But I'm more interested in who you have as your top 3 Saad? :TU:
Kilsby
Cruiserweight
Posts: 467
Joined: 09 Sep 2010, 08:52

Re: Ward was one of most complete and versatille fighters that boxing gave!

Post by Kilsby »

Kalan wrote:Ward is a piece of shiit... a cheating bastard who's running from a very tough division that would give him a number of bad losses... Jay Z lost a fortune on this boy who won by hook or by crook -- so the public never supported Ward because they knew he was a dirt bag cheat.
^^^
Well thought out and thought provoking post :lol:
Post Reply