Heavyweight boxers shape

Cent0089
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3488
Joined: 03 May 2013, 13:02

Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by Cent0089 »

Just watched Briedis - Perez weigh in. IMO Perez was not a small heavyweight or fat heavyweight. 230-240 pounds of solid muscles. If this m an can do 197 pounds, i believe that at least 50% of heavyweight boxers can fight at cruiserweight limit. Too bad cruiserweight division is not more popular, hopefully this world boxing series change that.
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by BitPlayer »

Chirs Byrd looks better than a lot of heavyweights, and he's probably naturally a S.Middle.

Hell how many look atleast as bad as James Toney at heavyweight?
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by Kalan »

Not too many good ones... Toney was one of the fattest and worst looking top Heavyweights I've ever seen... Maybe Buster Mathis looked worse at 280
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by BitPlayer »

Kalan wrote:Not too many good ones... Toney was one of the fattest and worst looking top Heavyweights I've ever seen... Maybe Buster Mathis looked worse at 280
Depends at what point, he looked much worse at some times than others
Image
Image
Image
soulboy
Cruiserweight
Posts: 122
Joined: 06 Aug 2010, 13:20

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by soulboy »

Bruno and Joshua gotta be the 2 best heavys condition wise...id say Tyson Fury and half the Eastern European roadsweepers are the worse conditoned
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by BitPlayer »

soulboy wrote:Bruno and Joshua gotta be the 2 best heavys condition wise...id say Tyson Fury and half the Eastern European roadsweepers are the worse conditoned
Having very low bodyfat isn't being conditioned. A good conditioned fighter is one that can maintain high workrate over the distance.
pablothunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1155
Joined: 17 Oct 2009, 07:38

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by pablothunder »

BitPlayer wrote:
soulboy wrote:Bruno and Joshua gotta be the 2 best heavys condition wise...id say Tyson Fury and half the Eastern European roadsweepers are the worse conditoned
Having very low bodyfat isn't being conditioned. A good conditioned fighter is one that can maintain high workrate over the distance.
Exactly. In my line of work, gym guys come in all the time looking impressive, and they all drop off like flies. Stamina is always overlooked and doesn't necessarily require a glamorous form.
Last edited by pablothunder on 29 Sep 2017, 17:03, edited 2 times in total.
Tarkus
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by Tarkus »

First of all Perez was quite fat. Second, so far all we know is that he makes CW limit. It remains to be seen if he can perform at high level as CW. I dont see many good current heavies that can make CW limit. Probably Povetkin is the only one.

Image
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by jezzamundo »

BitPlayer wrote:
soulboy wrote:Bruno and Joshua gotta be the 2 best heavys condition wise...id say Tyson Fury and half the Eastern European roadsweepers are the worse conditoned
Having very low bodyfat isn't being conditioned. A good conditioned fighter is one that can maintain high workrate over the distance.
This, most chiseled does not equal best conditioned. Tim Witherspoon had manboobs when he fought Bruno, but clearly was the better conditioned athlete. Tyson Fury was well conditioned too, despite looking unimpressive.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by Enlightened-One »

Cent0089 wrote:Heavyweight boxers shape

Just watched Briedis - Perez weigh in. IMO Perez was not a small heavyweight or fat heavyweight. 230-240 pounds of solid muscles. If this m an can do 197 pounds, i believe that at least 50% of heavyweight boxers can fight at cruiserweight limit. Too bad cruiserweight division is not more popular, hopefully this world boxing series change that.
I submitted a post about this matter (back in February) and argued that Larry Holmes was pretty much the same size and maybe even smaller than today’s cruiserweights, whilst arguing that he was significantly “smaller” than the modern-day equivalent of today’s heavyweights.

Here’s what I wrote (after gathering the stats of the top 60 heavyweights ranked by BoxRec):
Enlightened-One wrote:Can you name one fighter ranked in BoxRec’s top 60 heavyweight list, barring Eddie Chambers, that typically weighs less than 220lbs?

Can you name more than ten currently active heavyweight fighters ranked in BoxRec’s top 60 that typically weigh less than 230lbs?

Can you name 15 or more heavyweight fighters in BoxRec’s top 60 heavyweight fighter list that are shorter than 6’ 3”?

The 6’ 3” Larry Holmes’ average weight at his physical prime, for the first 39 bouts of his career, was 207½lbs. Over the equivalent time period, his opponents typically weighed 211½lbs.

Using BoxRec’s current top 60 heavyweight list:
• 63.5% of heavyweights are taller than Larry Holmes
• 100% of heavyweights typically weigh more than Larry Holmes' average 207½lb physical prime weight
• 42% of fighters are taller than 6’ 4” in height
• 77% of fighters typically weigh around the 240lb-mark or more
• 45% of fighters typically weigh around the 250lb-mark or more
• 20% of fighters typically weigh around the 260lb-mark or more
• The average weight of a top 60 heavyweight fighter is 247lbs

It’s also fairly easy to argue that rehydrated versions of the following modern day world-rated cruiserweights are highly-likely to be of a similar size to the 207½lb prime version of Larry Holmes:
• Oleksandr Usyk
• Murat Gassiev
• Tony Bellew
• Marco Huck
• Yunier Dorticos

It is also reasonable to claim that when Larry Holmes was in his prime, from 1973 to 1982, the vast majority of the time, he competed against men that were the physical equivalent of modern day cruiserweights.
Here's another similar post that elaborates on the current size of heavyweights that is particularly pertinent to the topic of this thread:
Enlightened-One wrote:George Foreman’s mathematical average weight was 217lbs from the start of his career through until the end of 1973. He was 217.5lbs when he faced Joe Frazier in 1973. He was 6’ 3.5” in height.

George Foreman’s height and weight in 1973 meant that his general size was almost certainly comparable to rehydrated versions of the following modern day world-rated cruiserweights:
• Oleksandr Usyk
• Murat Gassiev
• Tony Bellew
• Marco Huck
• Yunier Dorticos

This stance could be strengthened further if we looked at the size of cruiserweights that competed five to ten years ago (i.e. such as rehydrated versions of Guillermo Jones, David Haye, Enzo Maccarinelli, Steve Cunningham etc.).

Now it should be abundantly clear to deduce that the 1973 version of George Foreman would have had to endure a massive size disadvantage when competing against the current crop of world-rated heavyweights… and we’re talking a few inches in height and approx. 30lbs in weight:
• Tyson Fury = 265lbs; 6' 9"
• Wladimir Klitschko = 245lbs; 6' 6"
• Deontay Wilder = 228lbs; 6' 7"
• Kubrat Pulev = 253lbs; 6' 4.5"
• Luis Ortiz = 241lbs; 6' 4"
• Anthony Joshua = 249lbs; 6' 6"
• Joseph Parker = 246lbs; 6' 4"

From the start of his career through until 1973, the average George Foreman opponent was typically 6’ 0” in height, weighing around the 206lbs mark...
Therefore, you are wrong to claim that 50% of modern heavyweights can compete effectively as cruiserweights.
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by jezzamundo »

Cent0089 wrote:Just watched Briedis - Perez weigh in. IMO Perez was not a small heavyweight or fat heavyweight. 230-240 pounds of solid muscles. If this m an can do 197 pounds, i believe that at least 50% of heavyweight boxers can fight at cruiserweight limit. Too bad cruiserweight division is not more popular, hopefully this world boxing series change that.
I would disagree and say that Perez was both a small and a fat heavyweight. He looked a bit soft at 230lb and downright fat at 240lb. If he were to remain at heavyweight, I actually think his best fighting weight would be around 215lb, where he would have better stamina, while retaining the speed advantage he has over most heavyweights.
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by jezzamundo »

Enlightened-One wrote:
Cent0089 wrote:Heavyweight boxers shape

Just watched Briedis - Perez weigh in. IMO Perez was not a small heavyweight or fat heavyweight. 230-240 pounds of solid muscles. If this m an can do 197 pounds, i believe that at least 50% of heavyweight boxers can fight at cruiserweight limit. Too bad cruiserweight division is not more popular, hopefully this world boxing series change that.
I submitted a post about this matter (back in February) and argued that Larry Holmes was pretty much the same size and maybe even smaller than today’s cruiserweights, whilst arguing that he was significantly “smaller” than the modern-day equivalent of today’s heavyweights.

Here’s what I wrote (after gathering the stats of the top 60 heavyweights ranked by BoxRec):
Enlightened-One wrote:Can you name one fighter ranked in BoxRec’s top 60 heavyweight list, barring Eddie Chambers, that typically weighs less than 220lbs?

Can you name more than ten currently active heavyweight fighters ranked in BoxRec’s top 60 that typically weigh less than 230lbs?

Can you name 15 or more heavyweight fighters in BoxRec’s top 60 heavyweight fighter list that are shorter than 6’ 3”?

The 6’ 3” Larry Holmes’ average weight at his physical prime, for the first 39 bouts of his career, was 207½lbs. Over the equivalent time period, his opponents typically weighed 211½lbs.

Using BoxRec’s current top 60 heavyweight list:
• 63.5% of heavyweights are taller than Larry Holmes
• 100% of heavyweights typically weigh more than Larry Holmes' average 207½lb physical prime weight
• 42% of fighters are taller than 6’ 4” in height
• 77% of fighters typically weigh around the 240lb-mark or more
• 45% of fighters typically weigh around the 250lb-mark or more
• 20% of fighters typically weigh around the 260lb-mark or more
• The average weight of a top 60 heavyweight fighter is 247lbs

It’s also fairly easy to argue that rehydrated versions of the following modern day world-rated cruiserweights are highly-likely to be of a similar size to the 207½lb prime version of Larry Holmes:
• Oleksandr Usyk
• Murat Gassiev
• Tony Bellew
• Marco Huck
• Yunier Dorticos

It is also reasonable to claim that when Larry Holmes was in his prime, from 1973 to 1982, the vast majority of the time, he competed against men that were the physical equivalent of modern day cruiserweights.
Here's another similar post that elaborates on the current size of heavyweights that is particularly pertinent to the topic of this thread:
Enlightened-One wrote:George Foreman’s mathematical average weight was 217lbs from the start of his career through until the end of 1973. He was 217.5lbs when he faced Joe Frazier in 1973. He was 6’ 3.5” in height.

George Foreman’s height and weight in 1973 meant that his general size was almost certainly comparable to rehydrated versions of the following modern day world-rated cruiserweights:
• Oleksandr Usyk
• Murat Gassiev
• Tony Bellew
• Marco Huck
• Yunier Dorticos

This stance could be strengthened further if we looked at the size of cruiserweights that competed five to ten years ago (i.e. such as rehydrated versions of Guillermo Jones, David Haye, Enzo Maccarinelli, Steve Cunningham etc.).

Now it should be abundantly clear to deduce that the 1973 version of George Foreman would have had to endure a massive size disadvantage when competing against the current crop of world-rated heavyweights… and we’re talking a few inches in height and approx. 30lbs in weight:
• Tyson Fury = 265lbs; 6' 9"
• Wladimir Klitschko = 245lbs; 6' 6"
• Deontay Wilder = 228lbs; 6' 7"
• Kubrat Pulev = 253lbs; 6' 4.5"
• Luis Ortiz = 241lbs; 6' 4"
• Anthony Joshua = 249lbs; 6' 6"
• Joseph Parker = 246lbs; 6' 4"

From the start of his career through until 1973, the average George Foreman opponent was typically 6’ 0” in height, weighing around the 206lbs mark...
Therefore, you are wrong to claim that 50% of modern heavyweights can compete effectively as cruiserweights.
I agree - 50% is too high, but there are many heavyweights who probably could compete at cruiserweight and many who have. The fact that Povetkin has been a Top 5 heavyweights for about a decade - not to mention the successes of Evander Holyfield, Mike Tyson, David Haye, Eddie Chambers, David Tua, Chris Byrd, James Toney, Ruslan Chagaev and others - proves that those saying the champions of old couldn't compete with today's giants couldn't be more wrong.
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by tobyh5 »

Lets ignore the elephant in the room which is that a high percentage of modern fighters have an interesting "supplement" regime so actual true natural weight is unknown
Heretic
Super Middleweight
Posts: 2046
Joined: 28 Oct 2012, 07:18

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by Heretic »

Enlightened-One wrote:
Cent0089 wrote:Heavyweight boxers shape

Just watched Briedis - Perez weigh in. IMO Perez was not a small heavyweight or fat heavyweight. 230-240 pounds of solid muscles. If this m an can do 197 pounds, i believe that at least 50% of heavyweight boxers can fight at cruiserweight limit. Too bad cruiserweight division is not more popular, hopefully this world boxing series change that.
I submitted a post about this matter (back in February) and argued that Larry Holmes was pretty much the same size and maybe even smaller than today’s cruiserweights, whilst arguing that he was significantly “smaller” than the modern-day equivalent of today’s heavyweights.

Here’s what I wrote (after gathering the stats of the top 60 heavyweights ranked by BoxRec):
Enlightened-One wrote:Can you name one fighter ranked in BoxRec’s top 60 heavyweight list, barring Eddie Chambers, that typically weighs less than 220lbs?

Can you name more than ten currently active heavyweight fighters ranked in BoxRec’s top 60 that typically weigh less than 230lbs?

Can you name 15 or more heavyweight fighters in BoxRec’s top 60 heavyweight fighter list that are shorter than 6’ 3”?

The 6’ 3” Larry Holmes’ average weight at his physical prime, for the first 39 bouts of his career, was 207½lbs. Over the equivalent time period, his opponents typically weighed 211½lbs.

Using BoxRec’s current top 60 heavyweight list:
• 63.5% of heavyweights are taller than Larry Holmes
• 100% of heavyweights typically weigh more than Larry Holmes' average 207½lb physical prime weight
• 42% of fighters are taller than 6’ 4” in height
• 77% of fighters typically weigh around the 240lb-mark or more
• 45% of fighters typically weigh around the 250lb-mark or more
• 20% of fighters typically weigh around the 260lb-mark or more
• The average weight of a top 60 heavyweight fighter is 247lbs

It’s also fairly easy to argue that rehydrated versions of the following modern day world-rated cruiserweights are highly-likely to be of a similar size to the 207½lb prime version of Larry Holmes:
• Oleksandr Usyk
• Murat Gassiev
• Tony Bellew
• Marco Huck
• Yunier Dorticos

It is also reasonable to claim that when Larry Holmes was in his prime, from 1973 to 1982, the vast majority of the time, he competed against men that were the physical equivalent of modern day cruiserweights.
Here's another similar post that elaborates on the current size of heavyweights that is particularly pertinent to the topic of this thread:
Enlightened-One wrote:George Foreman’s mathematical average weight was 217lbs from the start of his career through until the end of 1973. He was 217.5lbs when he faced Joe Frazier in 1973. He was 6’ 3.5” in height.

George Foreman’s height and weight in 1973 meant that his general size was almost certainly comparable to rehydrated versions of the following modern day world-rated cruiserweights:
• Oleksandr Usyk
• Murat Gassiev
• Tony Bellew
• Marco Huck
• Yunier Dorticos

This stance could be strengthened further if we looked at the size of cruiserweights that competed five to ten years ago (i.e. such as rehydrated versions of Guillermo Jones, David Haye, Enzo Maccarinelli, Steve Cunningham etc.).

Now it should be abundantly clear to deduce that the 1973 version of George Foreman would have had to endure a massive size disadvantage when competing against the current crop of world-rated heavyweights… and we’re talking a few inches in height and approx. 30lbs in weight:
• Tyson Fury = 265lbs; 6' 9"
• Wladimir Klitschko = 245lbs; 6' 6"
• Deontay Wilder = 228lbs; 6' 7"
• Kubrat Pulev = 253lbs; 6' 4.5"
• Luis Ortiz = 241lbs; 6' 4"
• Anthony Joshua = 249lbs; 6' 6"
• Joseph Parker = 246lbs; 6' 4"

From the start of his career through until 1973, the average George Foreman opponent was typically 6’ 0” in height, weighing around the 206lbs mark...
Therefore, you are wrong to claim that 50% of modern heavyweights can compete effectively as cruiserweights.
Holy shit I actually agree with something that EO wrote. Scary :lol:
Heretic
Super Middleweight
Posts: 2046
Joined: 28 Oct 2012, 07:18

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by Heretic »

I feel like many of you are mixing up combat sport with beauty contest.

The weight doesn't really matter if you get the job done. It might even help. Harder to push around and it gives some protection to the body.

Too much muscles will only slow you down and burn huge amounts of oxygen which will lead to stamina issues.

Every boxer is different and they and their trainers need to find what works best for them.

But as always the forum warriors know the best :lol:
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by BitPlayer »

Here's a crazy one
http://boxrec.com/en/boxer/368020

Used to fight at over 200lbs, but last fought at 140lbs.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

soulboy wrote:Bruno and Joshua gotta be the 2 best heavys condition wise...id say Tyson Fury and half the Eastern European roadsweepers are the worse conditoned
Holyfield
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9453
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by tiny_acres »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
soulboy wrote:Bruno and Joshua gotta be the 2 best heavys condition wise...id say Tyson Fury and half the Eastern European roadsweepers are the worse conditoned
Holyfield
Good call on Holyfield. You can add Ken Norton and Mike Weaver to the list
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by Lackeos »

Mike Perez is 6' 1". You can't just claim that 97% of heavyweights can make the same weight as Perez when like half of the division is 6' 3" or taller. Probably at least 14% of the division is 6' 5" or taller. So how the hell are all of them supposed to come down to the same weight as Mike Perez? You want them to just be super skinny like Diego Corrales, Thomas Oosthuizen, and Ali Funeka? What would even be the point of that? The heavyweight division has historically been the better-paying division, so you're basically taking a pay cut by dropping down to cruiserweight. Of the few heavyweights who've done it, most of them were finished and needed a gimmick to get another decent payday.
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by Lackeos »

BitPlayer wrote:Here's a crazy one
http://boxrec.com/en/boxer/368020

Used to fight at over 200lbs, but last fought at 140lbs.
Remarkably dropped all of that weight between August 2016 and July 2017.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by Enlightened-One »

Lackeos wrote:
BitPlayer wrote:Here's a crazy one
http://boxrec.com/en/boxer/368020

Used to fight at over 200lbs, but last fought at 140lbs.
Remarkably dropped all of that weight between August 2016 and July 2017.
Isn’t one of Deontay Wilder’s victims the polar opposite of this guy? Damon McCreary started his career weighing only 166lbs, entered the ring against ‘The Bronze Bomber’ weighing 262¼lbs and later on in his career, he was a whopping 272½lbs? :o
Last edited by Enlightened-One on 09 Oct 2017, 05:03, edited 1 time in total.
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by candyslim »

The curse of being 'big-boned' :D
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101517
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Enlightened-One wrote:
Lackeos wrote:
BitPlayer wrote:Here's a crazy one
http://boxrec.com/en/boxer/368020

Used to fight at over 200lbs, but last fought at 140lbs.
Remarkably dropped all of that weight between August 2016 and July 2017.
Isn’t one of Deontay Wilder’s victims the polar opposite of this guy? Damon McCreary started his career weighing only 162lbs, entered the ring against ‘The Bronze Bomber’ weighing 229lbs and only one year after suffering a second round KO loss to the current WBC world champion, the very next time he entered the ring, he was a whopping 322½lbs? :o
Doesn't say he weighed over 300lbs..


But another Wilder victim Dustin Nichols has had his weight change more than i can think.. constantly up and down.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by Enlightened-One »

Ruthless-RKO wrote:
Enlightened-One wrote:
Lackeos wrote: Remarkably dropped all of that weight between August 2016 and July 2017.
Isn’t one of Deontay Wilder’s victims the polar opposite of this guy? Damon McCreary started his career weighing only 166lbs, entered the ring against ‘The Bronze Bomber’ weighing 262¼lbs and later on in his career, he was a whopping 272½lbs? :o
Doesn't say he weighed over 300lbs..


But another Wilder victim Dustin Nichols has had his weight change more than i can think.. constantly up and down.
You're right, I fúckéd up! I’ve corrected my post accordingly.

He went from 166lbs to 272½lbs.

I have to admit, the fellow you mentioned, with his weight fluctuating rapidly between 450lbs to 320lbs is pretty astonishing... and I'm a little surprised that Deontay was even allowed to share the ring with someone like that. :o
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Heavyweight boxers shape

Post by candyslim »

That's it isn't it. Huge muscles might look impressive and something to be coveted, but they aren't really a friend to the fighter. Bruno is a case in point. He might have looked awesome but was blowing out of his arse after 6 rounds or so. That massive physique sucks up oxygen like a 7 litre V8 sucks up gasoline.
Post Reply