Tyson Fury won't reapply

Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by Mimmy »

Horse wrote:
bigjack wrote:I'm not a fan of his any longer,however he reached the very top of his game,9 billion people on earth
7.5 billion people, I believe.
7.442 in 2014

7.6 in 2017.

You need to get Google its the future.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47059
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by gilgamesh »

bigjack wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
bigjack wrote:
Gilgamesh was right then,he's not that good after all :lol:
Of those 7.5 Billion people only about 2000 of them are active Heavyweight Boxers. Tyson Fury was one of the better Heavyweight boxers of his time that's why he got the chance he got, but when you look at the history of the sport, and the history of the Heavyweight Championship, you won't find a Heavyweight Champion that had a less significant run as Champion.

I agree he's been a very poor champion,but out of those 2000 active heavies,how many will or have become world champion,just for the record i wish he would just vanish never to be seen again,i'm sick of the on off comebacks.
I acknowledge that he became World Champion, and that makes him better than most BOXERS. I'll give you that. It doesn't make him better than most...or in my opinion ANY Heavyweight Champion.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by Horse »

gilgamesh wrote:Of those 7.5 Billion people only about 2000 of them are active Heavyweight Boxers. Tyson Fury was one of the better Heavyweight boxers of his time that's why he got the chance he got, but when you look at the history of the sport, and the history of the Heavyweight Championship, you won't find a Heavyweight Champion that had a less significant run as Champion.
Shannon Briggs?
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47059
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by gilgamesh »

Horse wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:Of those 7.5 Billion people only about 2000 of them are active Heavyweight Boxers. Tyson Fury was one of the better Heavyweight boxers of his time that's why he got the chance he got, but when you look at the history of the sport, and the history of the Heavyweight Championship, you won't find a Heavyweight Champion that had a less significant run as Champion.
Shannon Briggs?
Shannon Briggs defended, and lost his title like a man.

The Shannon that got knocked out by Lennox Lewis, knocks out Tyson Fury.
closer
Super Welterweight
Posts: 140
Joined: 28 Feb 2015, 12:44

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by closer »

How many times did he defend his belts? Whats' that.... 0?.... Yea, great champion. Got his ass kicked by Big John Mcdermott too, and been put down hard by cruisers. He could also be a drug cheat, who knows.

One more thing, 60 year old Wlad was not interested at all in that fight, and was even retracting punches mid flight on a clear target. Very bizarre performance. He's been a shocking champion and i have lost all patients. His resume is shit too.
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10164
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by samwbr »

Will he get licensed by another board with unresolved issues with the board here hanging over him?
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23132
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by mickey1975 »

You'll also struggle to find one who dethroned such a long reigning champion in his adopted home country. Fire away lads, 10 years champion minimum, boxer who beat him has to be from a different country.
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10164
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by samwbr »

mickey1975 wrote:You'll also struggle to find one who dethroned such a long reigning champion in his adopted home country. Fire away lads, 10 years champion minimum, boxer who beat him has to be from a different country.
Nobody with any sense disputes the achievement. What came immediately afterwards and continues too is what people have, rightly so IMO, issue with and I say that as a sympathiser over his doping issues. He deserves better than to have it dragged interminably along, if that is what is happening and there isn't more to it from the Fury camp.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23132
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by mickey1975 »

I think he's innocent of steroids and guilty as sin of Coke. Still.
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by Tomasino »

gilgamesh wrote:
Horse wrote:
TopGun wrote:Poor comment from a MOD mate, clearly not the worst heavyweight that ever lived. Bit embarrassing comment isn't it? Who Mods the Mods these days? :doh:
I'd mod them, if I was a mod.
You're too reactionary to be a good mod. I have the mental capacity to disagree with somebody without lashing out at them with bans and stuff like that. I don't know that several posters would.

Authority really goes to some people's heads. I act the same today as I did the days and weeks before I was ever a mod. I'm just one of the fellas on the board. I only wield my Mod powers if I really need to.

Is it really even authority? I'm glad you 'act the same'. It must be difficult as they say power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely :lol:
Gnome
Cruiserweight
Posts: 5456
Joined: 13 Nov 2010, 18:54

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by Gnome »

Horse wrote:
TopGun wrote:Poor comment from a MOD mate, clearly not the worst heavyweight that ever lived. Bit embarrassing comment isn't it? Who Mods the Mods these days? :doh:
I'd mod them, if I was a mod.
Horse as Mod!

Make Boxrec great again!
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by Tomasino »

mickey1975 wrote:I think he's innocent of steroids and guilty as sin of Coke. Still.

I never understand this. Folk are happy to abuse themselves with drugs but not better themselves with steroids? Every steroid user I've met takes drugs. Why wouldn't Tyson? I go the same way with Mike Tyson.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47059
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by gilgamesh »

Tomasino wrote:

Is it really even authority? I'm glad you 'act the same'. It must be difficult as they say power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely :lol:
I mean...it's a slight form of authority I guess. It's certainly something that could be abused if not handled properly, but that would quickly lead to Forum members calling for the Mod powers to be stripped from the sh*t Mod in question. Overzealous mods can quickly suck all the fun and enjoyment out of any forum.
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by Tomasino »

gilgamesh wrote:
Tomasino wrote:

Is it really even authority? I'm glad you 'act the same'. It must be difficult as they say power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely :lol:
I mean...it's a slight form of authority I guess. It's certainly something that could be abused if not handled properly, but that would quickly lead to Forum members calling for the Mod powers to be stripped from the sh*t Mod in question. Overzealous mods can quickly suck all the fun and enjoyment out of any forum.

I love Anton :bow:

I'm glad it's you, Merc and Mimmy now. I remember when Hurlock became a mod, that was a joke!
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47059
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by gilgamesh »

I don't even remember this Hurlock character. It was that bad huh? :lol:

There's actually a few people who are secret Mods too. Like Undercover cops

I won't tell you who they are though...it's a secret :lol:

Though it really wouldn't be all that hard to guess I don't think.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by Andrew »

mickey1975 wrote:I think he's innocent of steroids and guilty as sin of Coke. Still.
It's the refusing the drug test which will get him IMO.
Wa1nuts
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 515
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 10:01

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by Wa1nuts »

TopGun wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
LancashireLoyal wrote:
Because im a fan of his,always have been and always will be.He has absolutely nothing left to prove to anybody,he's accomplished everything you can in the sport.

And dont believe everything you read in a newspaper...
"He's accomplished everything you can in the sport"

By being the Worst Heavyweight Champion that ever lived? :lol:

Poor comment from a MOD mate, clearly not the worst heavyweight that ever lived. Bit embarrassing comment isn't it? Who Mods the Mods these days? :doh:
He called him a f a t sack of sh t in another thread. I'm pretty sure the sack of sh t beat Wlad convincingly but don't see him slating Wlad in that way
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by Andrew »

For those saying just get a license anywhere else i.e. Ireland it doesn't matter as they are affiliated. Peter Fury said this himself.

The whole issue is UKAD not the BBBofC who are doing their job.

UKAD are not fit for purpose this whole farce proves it.
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by Mimmy »

Wa1nuts wrote:
TopGun wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
"He's accomplished everything you can in the sport"

By being the Worst Heavyweight Champion that ever lived? :lol:

Poor comment from a MOD mate, clearly not the worst heavyweight that ever lived. Bit embarrassing comment isn't it? Who Mods the Mods these days? :doh:
He called him a f a t sack of sh t in another thread. I'm pretty sure the sack of sh t beat Wlad convincingly but don't see him slating Wlad in that way

Did he call him a fat sack of sh1t in another thread? Bloody hell, dont tell anyone else.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47059
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by gilgamesh »

Wa1nuts wrote:
TopGun wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
"He's accomplished everything you can in the sport"

By being the Worst Heavyweight Champion that ever lived? :lol:

Poor comment from a MOD mate, clearly not the worst heavyweight that ever lived. Bit embarrassing comment isn't it? Who Mods the Mods these days? :doh:
He called him a f a t sack of sh t in another thread. I'm pretty sure the sack of sh t beat Wlad convincingly but don't see him slating Wlad in that way
I'll call him a fat sack of sh*t in this thread too.

He IS a fat sack of sh*t.

He "Beat" Wlad in a staring contest because Wlad didn't come to fight that night. I sh*t on both of them hard after that fight because it's the worst fight I've ever seen. Wlad came back and at least partially redeemed himself by fighting and losing a fantastic battle with Anthony Joshua. Tyson Fury has left us with nothing, but that bad taste in our mouths, and watching his fat ass grow.
SAPFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2732
Joined: 06 May 2010, 16:48

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by SAPFO »

gilgamesh wrote:
Horse wrote:
TopGun wrote:Poor comment from a MOD mate, clearly not the worst heavyweight that ever lived. Bit embarrassing comment isn't it? Who Mods the Mods these days? :doh:
I'd mod them, if I was a mod.
You're too reactionary to be a good mod. I have the mental capacity to disagree with somebody without lashing out at them with bans and stuff like that. I don't know that several posters would.

Authority really goes to some people's heads. I act the same today as I did the days and weeks before I was ever a mod. I'm just one of the fellas on the board. I only wield my Mod powers if I really need to.
Says the man who threatened to ban me for posting the same vid in 2 relevant threads. In my years on Boxrec I’ve never had such a reaction. I’ve always found the modding here excellent until that point.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47059
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by gilgamesh »

SAPFO wrote:
Says the man who threatened to ban me for posting the same vid in 2 relevant threads. In my years on Boxrec I’ve never had such a reaction. I’ve always found the modding here excellent until that point.
I recall what you speak of. You were posting the video multiple times, and it seemed spammish to me. I haven't given you guff any other time have I?

Besides you used the key word there "Threatened" to ban you. I didn't ban you, and you got my message, and quit spamming the board with the video. So I'd say that was Mission Accomplished as a mod, and there were no casualties suffered.

All in all I'd say it worked out well.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by Horse »

gilgamesh wrote:I recall what you speak of. You were posting the video multiple times, and it seemed spammish to me. I haven't given you guff any other time have I?

Besides you used the key word there "Threatened" to ban you. I didn't ban you, and you got my message, and quit spamming the board with the video. So I'd say that was Mission Accomplished as a mod, and there were no casualties suffered.

All in all I'd say it worked out well.
Mods going around threatening people is not okay.
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by Mimmy »

Horse wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:I recall what you speak of. You were posting the video multiple times, and it seemed spammish to me. I haven't given you guff any other time have I?

Besides you used the key word there "Threatened" to ban you. I didn't ban you, and you got my message, and quit spamming the board with the video. So I'd say that was Mission Accomplished as a mod, and there were no casualties suffered.

All in all I'd say it worked out well.
Mods going around threatening people is not okay.
Blow another tune for eff sake.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Tyson Fury won't reapply

Post by Counter-puncher »

Horse wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:I recall what you speak of. You were posting the video multiple times, and it seemed spammish to me. I haven't given you guff any other time have I?

Besides you used the key word there "Threatened" to ban you. I didn't ban you, and you got my message, and quit spamming the board with the video. So I'd say that was Mission Accomplished as a mod, and there were no casualties suffered.

All in all I'd say it worked out well.
Mods going around threatening people is not okay.
If it gets the right result, it is.

Anyway, it's better than a knee jerk ban without warning, I think you'll agree
Post Reply