Wilder Says Whyte Is On PEDs

[asdfjkl]

well, dylian was on peds. not sure if still is.

As dumb as Wilder is, he should still understand a difference between was and is.

Dillian took something he always took all his life, not realising it all of a sudden became illegal over time. On top of that, unlike in the US, in the UK they give massive bans for everyone who's suspicious, in the US and the countries around, they give warnings and things like that.
That's why Wilder can drive around with cars full of drugs, no problem and Stiverne can take all he likes, even in front of a wada or vada official and got no problems.

[Evander]

I didn't click on the link but ...
If Deontay wants to talk some smack then pick on the boxers style, reputation, opponents, credibility, popularity or social media standing among others.
Let's build the division not break it up.

[SaadOffTheDeck]

on or off peds, whyte would get his head taken off by wilder.

i wish wilder would go through fighting the drug cheats. hed ko them anyway. only joshua beats him.

It's just hearn being the best promoter in the game. Though in Eddie's defense, you can have worse problems than him promoting your fights. He knew he'd say no and Whyte would get shine from all the retards that hate Wilder. Granted, deontay is an unknown commodity past the hard core, but in that tiny community he is the most hated fighter in the couple decades of it's existence.

[TheBeast]

well, dylian was on peds. not sure if still is.

[caldo2025]

Look, i have to be honest, I don't even pay attention to the Heavyweights anymore except Joshua just because of these postponed fights and ducking going on. But I did actually watch that ridiculous clip of Wilder driving trying to explain something and he ended up losing me by the end of it and I had no idea where he was trying to take me on that ride but is it me or does Wilder think that EVERYONE is on PEDs?

To me, he seems like he's lost his mind a little and is obsessed with PEDs and accusations. Some of these boxers that Wilder accused of PEDS in this video, should call their lawyers immediately and get that lawsuit filed. Just like Manny did to Floyd when Floyd accused him of roids back in the day. Floyd parted with a good amount of settlement money on that one.

You can't just go around accusing of PEDS without evidence. Suck it up and fight Wilder, you absolute bum. It was freaking BLOOD PRESSURE MEDICATION dude.

[Stuarty]

Whyte was on PEDS he's served a ban before. Don't blame Wilder for being paranoid tbh.

[Enlightened-One]

Dillian Whyte received a two-year ban from boxing in 2013 due to failing a drugs test after taking the controversial supplement Jack3D.

So the Brit has previously used PED’s and Wilder’s legal representatives can probably use this fact to dismiss the legitimacy of any accusations of slander, instead citing “rhetorical hyperbole”, which they have previous done for other lawsuits.

[Enlightened-One]

You can't just go around accusing of PEDS without evidence.

You accused Floyd Mayweather Jr. of taking PED's without evidence.

[asdfjkl]

You can't just go around accusing of PEDS without evidence.

You accused Floyd Mayweather Jr. of taking PED's without evidence.

What do you mean no evidence? If someone needs 750ml of any substance in his veins for whatever reason, he's not ready to get in a boxing ring, simple as that.

[Enlightened-One]

You can't just go around accusing of PEDS without evidence.

You accused Floyd Mayweather Jr. of taking PED's without evidence.

What do you mean no evidence? If someone needs 750ml of any substance in his veins for whatever reason, he's not ready to get in a boxing ring, simple as that.

Unless you've got a medical doctorate, which I highly-doubt you have, I personally prefer to refrain from employing the "no smoke without fire" justice system, because it mostly results in grossly unfair and hideously inaccurate assumptions and all sorts of needlessly derogatory claims being made.

[asdfjkl]

You accused Floyd Mayweather Jr. of taking PED's without evidence.

What do you mean no evidence? If someone needs 750ml of any substance in his veins for whatever reason, he's not ready to get in a boxing ring, simple as that.

Unless you've got a medical doctorate, which I highly-doubt you have, I personally prefer to refrain from employing the "no smoke without fire" justice system, because it mostly results in grossly unfair and hideously inaccurate assumptions and all sorts of needlessly derogatory claims being made.

Have you actually ever heard of anyone in your entire life who needed even half this amount of any substance in his veins that survived that and is able to tell about it? Let alone someone who actually fights for world titles in boxing? One day after?!

I'm sorry, but if you're really that sick, you should stay in hospital and nowhere else for quite a while.

[asdfjkl]

well, dylian was on peds. not sure if still is.

You guys mean Stiverne is on peds? And Wilder got his car full of drugs? And Arreola, who made Wilder a cripple for several months in a row during a staged sparring session is on peds and actually got busted several times, in fact exactly the same peds as Wilder had in his car?

[caldo2025]

You can't just go around accusing of PEDS without evidence.

You accused Floyd Mayweather Jr. of taking PED's without evidence.

This is an anonymous message board, once again, jackass. I keep having to explain the same things to you. You don't NEED evidence to share an opinion here and we have all been right and we've all been wrong. We are not here pushing out video blogs with scathing allegations made to purposefully hurt another fighter's future money making potential without any evidence. IF these boxers that Wilder called out in the video are clean then they will sue. If they have skeletons that could be dug up in their closet then they won't.

Oh just shut up. Every letter typed by me to you is a wasted movement.

[Enlightened-One]

You can't just go around accusing of PEDS without evidence.

You accused Floyd Mayweather Jr. of taking PED's without evidence.

This is an anonymous message board, once again, jackass. I keep having to explain the same things to you. You don't NEED evidence to share an opinion here and we have all been right and we've all been wrong. We are not here pushing out video blogs with scathing allegations made to purposefully hurt another fighter's future money making potential without any evidence. IF these boxers that Wilder called out in the video are clean then they will sue. If they have skeletons that could be dug up in their closet then they won't.

Oh just shut up. Every letter typed by me to you is a wasted movement.

So in simple terms, you’re allowed to criticise someone else that is slanderous, but you can’t be criticised for being slanderous?

[caldo2025]

You accused Floyd Mayweather Jr. of taking PED's without evidence.

This is an anonymous message board, once again, jackass. I keep having to explain the same things to you. You don't NEED evidence to share an opinion here and we have all been right and we've all been wrong. We are not here pushing out video blogs with scathing allegations made to purposefully hurt another fighter's future money making potential without any evidence. IF these boxers that Wilder called out in the video are clean then they will sue. If they have skeletons that could be dug up in their closet then they won't.

Oh just shut up. Every letter typed by me to you is a wasted movement.

So in simple terms, you’re allowed to criticise someone else that is slanderous, but you can’t be criticised for being slanderous?

LOL, you have no grasp of simple obvious things. I can't help you. Please see someone that can put the effort in to keep you better informed. I'm not your guy. Sorry.

[Enlightened-One]

This is an anonymous message board, once again, jackass. I keep having to explain the same things to you. You don't NEED evidence to share an opinion here and we have all been right and we've all been wrong. We are not here pushing out video blogs with scathing allegations made to purposefully hurt another fighter's future money making potential without any evidence. IF these boxers that Wilder called out in the video are clean then they will sue. If they have skeletons that could be dug up in their closet then they won't.

Oh just shut up. Every letter typed by me to you is a wasted movement.

So in simple terms, you’re allowed to criticise someone else that is slanderous, but you can’t be criticised for being slanderous?

LOL, you have no grasp of simple obvious things. I can't help you. Please see someone that can put the effort in to keep you better informed. I'm not your guy. Sorry.

Well if you knew your stuff, you’d realise that Dillian Whyte himself claimed that Anthony Joshua needed “lottery funding” in order to fund being “loaded on steroids”, which effectively grants permission for Deontay Wilder’s rhetorical hyperbole, since the Brit himself employed the very same tactic.

A notable point to acknowledge, relates to the fact that Dillian Whyte has already tested positive for using banned substances, resulting in a ban, which adds extra justification for the American’s claims.

Regardless, in your mind, you’re allowed to criticise someone else for being slanderous, but no one is allowed to criticise you for being slanderous.

"LOL, you have no grasp of simple obvious things. I can't help you. Please see someone that can put the effort in to keep you better informed. I'm not your guy. Sorry."

Is that silence that I hear?

[caldo2025]

So in simple terms, you’re allowed to criticise someone else that is slanderous, but you can’t be criticised for being slanderous?

LOL, you have no grasp of simple obvious things. I can't help you. Please see someone that can put the effort in to keep you better informed. I'm not your guy. Sorry.

Well if you knew your stuff, you’d realise that Dillian Whyte himself claimed that Anthony Joshua needed “lottery funding” in order to fund being “loaded on steroids”, which effectively grants permission for Deontay Wilder’s rhetorical hyperbole, since the Brit himself employed the very same tactic.

A notable point to acknowledge, relates to the fact that Dillian Whyte has already tested positive for using banned substances, resulting in a ban, which adds extra justification for the American’s claims.

Regardless, in your mind, you’re allowed to criticise someone else for being slanderous, but no one is allowed to criticise you for being slanderous.

"LOL, you have no grasp of simple obvious things. I can't help you. Please see someone that can put the effort in to keep you better informed. I'm not your guy. Sorry."

Is that silence that I hear?

Once again, no idea what you're talking about dude. More white noise from EO. Always great to see when i log on.

[Enlightened-One]

LOL, you have no grasp of simple obvious things. I can't help you. Please see someone that can put the effort in to keep you better informed. I'm not your guy. Sorry.

Well if you knew your stuff, you’d realise that Dillian Whyte himself claimed that Anthony Joshua needed “lottery funding” in order to fund being “loaded on steroids”, which effectively grants permission for Deontay Wilder’s rhetorical hyperbole, since the Brit himself employed the very same tactic.

A notable point to acknowledge, relates to the fact that Dillian Whyte has already tested positive for using banned substances, resulting in a ban, which adds extra justification for the American’s claims.

Regardless, in your mind, you’re allowed to criticise someone else for being slanderous, but no one is allowed to criticise you for being slanderous.

"LOL, you have no grasp of simple obvious things. I can't help you. Please see someone that can put the effort in to keep you better informed. I'm not your guy. Sorry."

Is that silence that I hear?

Once again, no idea what you're talking about dude. More white noise from EO. Always great to see when i log on.

"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." Socrates

Thank-you for conceding defeat.

[caldo2025]

Well if you knew your stuff, you’d realise that Dillian Whyte himself claimed that Anthony Joshua needed “lottery funding” in order to fund being “loaded on steroids”, which effectively grants permission for Deontay Wilder’s rhetorical hyperbole, since the Brit himself employed the very same tactic.

A notable point to acknowledge, relates to the fact that Dillian Whyte has already tested positive for using banned substances, resulting in a ban, which adds extra justification for the American’s claims.

Regardless, in your mind, you’re allowed to criticise someone else for being slanderous, but no one is allowed to criticise you for being slanderous.

"LOL, you have no grasp of simple obvious things. I can't help you. Please see someone that can put the effort in to keep you better informed. I'm not your guy. Sorry."

Is that silence that I hear?

Once again, no idea what you're talking about dude. More white noise from EO. Always great to see when i log on.

"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." Socrates

Thank-you for conceding defeat.

I'm telling you that i have no idea what you are saying...how does that equate to losing? But if it gets me out of this exchange, by all means accept my submission.