If Haye demolishes Bellew as he promised in fight 1 - then wouldn't he be in a similar position as he was before March - considered a threat?Spud wrote:The question which everyone is avoiding - in the bigger scheme of things - whoever wins Bellew/Haye 2 what does it prove?
Without insulting either boxer - will the winner go onto beat Joshua?
Its just another great big fat pay day for both with the winner being hyped up by the journalists and the public being hoodwinked that the winner is a viable threat.
Bellew has said time and time again Joshua is on another level - if he wins, he'll be looking at Wilder / Parker and then, perhaps then, there might be a clamour for Joshua.
Haye might be a different story, but he would need to demolish Bellew in the fashion he promised in fight 1... and even if he does that the likelihood is that he will need to fight a Parker or a Wilder to be really considered a viable threat.
Problem is though - whether it is Haye, Bellew or whoever - Joshua vs me would be PPV and sell out well - whether he is considered a viable threat or not. Joshua is fighting one of the top Heavyweights on the planet next and he is not considered a viable threat. There is currently only 1 viable threat to Joshua and he weighs 25 stone.... Any threat people perceived Parker to be has gone with Fury performance and Wilder is also doing a poor a job as a champion as I have ever seen in the Heavyweight division.... he is losing credibility with each performance.
The winner of Haye vs Bellew will be seen as the same type of threat as Pulev.... Is that viable, No - Does Eddie give a shit No - because it will sell anywhere - but then as I said, Joshua vs Me would do okay also.