Alright mate well you get me the medical report and I’ll believe you and Lemieux.boxing_rocks wrote:That's what happens when you start fighting with one hand.lazboy wrote:Can’t say I scored the rounds but I remember Lemieux loosing a significant amount of momentum.
David Lemiuex
Re: David Lemiuex
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: David Lemiuex
Are you another alt of fergus? Should that report be notarized?lazboy wrote:Alright mate well you get me the medical report and I’ll believe you and Lemieux.boxing_rocks wrote:That's what happens when you start fighting with one hand.lazboy wrote:Can’t say I scored the rounds but I remember Lemieux loosing a significant amount of momentum.
Re: David Lemiuex
I’d definitely want the document signed by the gp, not by you. You’re no GP.boxing_rocks wrote:Are you another alt of fergus? Should that report be notarized?lazboy wrote:Alright mate well you get me the medical report and I’ll believe you and Lemieux.boxing_rocks wrote:
That's what happens when you start fighting with one hand.
Re: David Lemiuex
What's NOT to like about David Lemieux? Honestly? Anyone complaining about an exciting fighter that will step in against anyone at any time and will go down swinging from his shoes until it's over has got issues. Boxing needs more David Lemieux's.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: David Lemiuex
Exactly. Boxing would be popular if there were more Lemieuxs.caldo2025 wrote:What's NOT to like about David Lemieux? Honestly? Anyone complaining about an exciting fighter that will step in against anyone at any time and will go down swinging from his shoes until it's over has got issues. Boxing needs more David Lemieux's.
Re: David Lemiuex
I just don't see Lemieux being overrated. The vast majority of people who know he exists consider him a good contender who will likely lose to every top level boxer he meets.
People like him because he is in good fights. I felt he was way overrated before he gassed v Rubio. I started calling him Lepieux, but to his credit, even after the Alcine loss, he stuck with it and improved his cardio and his skills.
I consider him a high level MW gatekeeper.
People like him because he is in good fights. I felt he was way overrated before he gassed v Rubio. I started calling him Lepieux, but to his credit, even after the Alcine loss, he stuck with it and improved his cardio and his skills.
I consider him a high level MW gatekeeper.
Re: David Lemiuex
I'd love to see Lemieux vs. Jacobs. I think that the public would change their opinion of DL after a fight like that. All that they remember is the the two fights he lost earlier in his career when he didn't have the cardio or experience and the beating he took from an ATG like GGG. Btw, there's nothing wrong with losing to GGG. At worst, Lemieux is in the top 5 in the ever improving and entertaining MW division. Not bad.Tanzio wrote:I just don't see Lemieux being overrated. The vast majority of people who know he exists consider him a good contender who will likely lose to every top level boxer he meets.
People like him because he is in good fights. I felt he was way overrated before he gassed v Rubio. I started calling him Lepieux, but to his credit, even after the Alcine loss, he stuck with it and improved his cardio and his skills.
I consider him a high level MW gatekeeper.