British Top 30 P4P October 2017

Deno1986
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 06:58

Re: British Top 30 P4P October 2017

Post by Deno1986 »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Deno1986 wrote:
thechump wrote: Shouldnt even be on the list,if you dont fight for 3 years why should you even be classed as an active boxer? Why not throw lennox lewis on the list aswell
Fury last fought 23 months ago and not 3 years. I hate when people exaggerate and falsify facts to try prove a point.
Nobody that fought 23 months ago should be in any rankings.
I agree but that wasn't my point.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: British Top 30 P4P October 2017

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Deno1986 wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Deno1986 wrote: Fury last fought 23 months ago and not 3 years. I hate when people exaggerate and falsify facts to try prove a point.
Nobody that fought 23 months ago should be in any rankings.
I agree but that wasn't my point.
Ok
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47058
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: British Top 30 P4P October 2017

Post by gilgamesh »

Horse wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:All the fighters ranked 8 thru 30 on Horse's list should be insulted.
They should get some better results then.
Yeah...too bad they ain't working as hard as this guy advance their careers.

Image
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: British Top 30 P4P October 2017

Post by BitPlayer »

gilgamesh wrote:
Horse wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:All the fighters ranked 8 thru 30 on Horse's list should be insulted.
They should get some better results then.
Yeah...too bad they ain't working as hard as this guy advance their careers.
You mean become manditory challengers, and then beat the clear dominant No. 1 in their division.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47058
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: British Top 30 P4P October 2017

Post by gilgamesh »

BitPlayer wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Horse wrote:They should get some better results then.
Yeah...too bad they ain't working as hard as this guy advance their careers.
You mean become manditory challengers, and then beat the clear dominant No. 1 in their division.
I mean sitting around getting fatter, and fatter while not actively competing in the sport. Which is all Tyson Fury has done for the last 2 years.
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: British Top 30 P4P October 2017

Post by TheGman »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Deno1986 wrote:
thechump wrote: Shouldnt even be on the list,if you dont fight for 3 years why should you even be classed as an active boxer? Why not throw lennox lewis on the list aswell
Fury last fought 23 months ago and not 3 years. I hate when people exaggerate and falsify facts to try prove a point.
Nobody that fought 23 months ago should be in any rankings.
Exactly,hate it when ppl try to make a point as if their right when their not :TU:
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: British Top 30 P4P October 2017

Post by TheGman »

Deno1986 wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Deno1986 wrote: Fury last fought 23 months ago and not 3 years. I hate when people exaggerate and falsify facts to try prove a point.
Nobody that fought 23 months ago should be in any rankings.
I agree but that wasn't my point.
23 months,24 next month so what he is still inactive. So u agree with his position in the list then???
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: British Top 30 P4P October 2017

Post by BigDoofus »

Horse wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:Correct, but Campbell lost to Yvan Mendy (world no.22) and has never won at world level.
He wasn't knocked out though and both of those fights were close.

He has also been far more active than Brook in recent years.
Campbell hasn't beaten a world level fighter.
Brook was doing well in his last 2 fights before injury stopped him.
Are you comparing Yvan Mendy with GGG?
olij999
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1242
Joined: 14 Jun 2004, 08:22

Re: British Top 30 P4P October 2017

Post by olij999 »

gilgamesh wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
I imagine his absurd backers think that extra fat makes him more slippery and hard to catch.
He can just absorb body shots these days. Like Bear Hugger on Super Punch Out :lol:
Never mind all of this list discussion. Most important question for me is what was Super Punch Out? And was it better than Frank Bruno's Boxing, or Barry McGuigan's Boxing, both of which I had in the 80s on my 48K Spectrum. Would hate to think there is a wonkily animated boxing game that has passed me by...
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32959
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: British Top 30 P4P October 2017

Post by Boxerbeetle »

olij999 wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
I imagine his absurd backers think that extra fat makes him more slippery and hard to catch.
He can just absorb body shots these days. Like Bear Hugger on Super Punch Out :lol:
Never mind all of this list discussion. Most important question for me is what was Super Punch Out? And was it better than Frank Bruno's Boxing, or Barry McGuigan's Boxing, both of which I had in the 80s on my 48K Spectrum. Would hate to think there is a wonkily animated boxing game that has passed me by...
Super Punch Out was amazing :yay:
olij999
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1242
Joined: 14 Jun 2004, 08:22

Re: British Top 30 P4P October 2017

Post by olij999 »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
olij999 wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
He can just absorb body shots these days. Like Bear Hugger on Super Punch Out :lol:
Never mind all of this list discussion. Most important question for me is what was Super Punch Out? And was it better than Frank Bruno's Boxing, or Barry McGuigan's Boxing, both of which I had in the 80s on my 48K Spectrum. Would hate to think there is a wonkily animated boxing game that has passed me by...
Super Punch Out was amazing :yay:
Now you are just making it worse! What was it? Describe it, please!
Bigdogsnose
Middleweight
Posts: 1472
Joined: 02 Dec 2013, 08:36

Re: British Top 30 P4P October 2017

Post by Bigdogsnose »

think Skeete could be higher, but understand why he is not. I think he is a fair bit talented than a lot of the lads above him, needs the fights to prove it. Think he would have beaten Horn.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47058
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: British Top 30 P4P October 2017

Post by gilgamesh »

olij999 wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
I imagine his absurd backers think that extra fat makes him more slippery and hard to catch.
He can just absorb body shots these days. Like Bear Hugger on Super Punch Out :lol:
Never mind all of this list discussion. Most important question for me is what was Super Punch Out? And was it better than Frank Bruno's Boxing, or Barry McGuigan's Boxing, both of which I had in the 80s on my 48K Spectrum. Would hate to think there is a wonkily animated boxing game that has passed me by...
If you don't know Super Punch Out, then there is my friend.

You're familiar with Mike Tyson's Punch Out I assume? Well Super Punch Out was the sequel for the Super NES.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJM-9MpL-sg

I've personally never played the Frank Bruno or Barry McGuigan's games you speak of. So you got me beat there.
citybluechris
Super Middleweight
Posts: 93
Joined: 10 Sep 2012, 17:06

Re: British Top 30 P4P October 2017

Post by citybluechris »

World champion ryan Burnett at 20?? And hes got a unification fight on saturday, hes achieved more and quite a few people above him, laughable
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: British Top 30 P4P October 2017

Post by jamamb »

burnett has haskins, farrag, and a well past it booth. maybe deserves a higher sport but not exactly a huge misplacement. he looks very talented though and should be moved well up if he wins saturday.
Post Reply