Pulev injured?

Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24628
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by Tony1244 »

asdfjkl wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:I'm hoping for Ortiz, that would be an awesome fight!
You don't lose one fight due to a failed Drug Test, and then pick up a bigger one as a result of said failed drug test. Doesn't work that way.
Ortiz didn't fail a drug test, despite I have to admit Eddy Hearn is very scared of Ortiz.
Ortiz did drugs and drugs are bad. Ok?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uh7l8dx-h8M
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by gilgamesh »

TheLeprechaun wrote:Whyte is overrated. Has he even improved since the Joshua fight?
That's debatable, but I'd say no not really. Not that I've seen.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by jamamb »

hasnt looked any better. we just know now that hes not really a puncher even though the josh fight maybe made it seem that way. he is top 15 buts thats on the division.
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4904
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by rd350lc »

If only Haye didn't have that bad toe ............
Tangerine
Middleweight
Posts: 1306
Joined: 15 Jan 2014, 17:33

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by Tangerine »

This got uploaded last week,when i was watching it i wondered if he had got the nod for a fight somewhere.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5pPT5vM3nQ
3132DW
Middleweight
Posts: 1435
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 03:27

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by 3132DW »

Carlos Takam new opponent.
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by tobyh5 »

Takam confirmed. Can we get full refunds?
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by gilgamesh »

tobyh5 wrote:Takam confirmed. Can we get full refunds?
Don't really know why you'd want one. It was the Anthony Joshua show the whole time. He was gonna smach Pulev, He's likely gonna smach Takam.

Takam is right there with Pulev in terms of legitimacy as a contender, and given the short notice angle he could potentially be an even bigger problem for Joshua than he would be otherwise.

Short notice opponents have a history of giving big names hell in Boxing. Because you'd been preparing for a different guy most of your camp, and then last minute you're facing a different style.
wesshaw1985
Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by wesshaw1985 »

gilgamesh wrote:
tobyh5 wrote:Takam confirmed. Can we get full refunds?
Don't really know why you'd want one. It was the Anthony Joshua show the whole time. He was gonna smach Pulev, He's likely gonna smach Takam.

Takam is right there with Pulev in terms of legitimacy as a contender.
Pulev has only ever lost to Wlad.
Takam has lost to Parker, Povetkin and Gregory Tony also drawn with Mike Perez.
Pulev is a stiffer test for AJ than Takam...
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by gilgamesh »

wesshaw1985 wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
tobyh5 wrote:Takam confirmed. Can we get full refunds?
Don't really know why you'd want one. It was the Anthony Joshua show the whole time. He was gonna smach Pulev, He's likely gonna smach Takam.

Takam is right there with Pulev in terms of legitimacy as a contender.
Pulev has only ever lost to Wlad.
Takam has lost to Parker, Povetkin and Gregory Tony also drawn with Mike Perez.
Pulev is a stiffer test for AJ than Takam...
I agree, but only ever so slightly, and the end result was gonna be the same either way. It's the Anthony Joshua show.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by jamamb »

pulev may be better than takam but he was even an easier match up for joshua. not a puncher, chin straight up, nearly got kod in one by wlad and not particularly durable. takam takes a good shot and will prob be moving joshua back more. if josh has stamina problems takam better suited to bring them out, though admittedly aj should win easily; but that's true against pretty much everyone.

for two weeks takam very good. you cant judge by same standards as fight made months ahead
boxingknockout
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 10:45

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by boxingknockout »

Can someone please tell me if Pulev has AIDS or not!! :evil:
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32676
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by Boxerbeetle »

boxingknockout wrote:Can someone please tell me if Pulev has AIDS or not!! :evil:
Does AIDS show up on ultrasound? :maybe:
boxingknockout
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 10:45

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by boxingknockout »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
boxingknockout wrote:Can someone please tell me if Pulev has AIDS or not!! :evil:
Does AIDS show up on ultrasound? :maybe:
I’m not an expert or a doctor
Flump
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2697
Joined: 14 May 2006, 14:11

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by Flump »

jamamb wrote:pulev may be better than takam but he was even an easier match up for joshua. not a puncher, chin straight up, nearly got kod in one by wlad and not particularly durable. takam takes a good shot and will prob be moving joshua back more. if josh has stamina problems takam better suited to bring them out, though admittedly aj should win easily; but that's true against pretty much everyone.

for two weeks takam very good. you cant judge by same standards as fight made months ahead
I agree with this, Takam for all his limitations may go a good few rounds where I'm not sure Pulev would have lasted 5 minutes.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32676
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by Boxerbeetle »

boxingknockout wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
boxingknockout wrote:Can someone please tell me if Pulev has AIDS or not!! :evil:
Does AIDS show up on ultrasound? :maybe:
I’m not an expert or a doctor
Nor me. Although I do remember it being well known that if you used the middle cubicle in my primary school toilet, you would definitely catch AIDS.
chinarich
Middleweight
Posts: 6859
Joined: 29 Dec 2013, 13:20

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by chinarich »

I think Takam is a preferable opponent, we may get more of a contest. According to what I just read on the Beeb Takam had been in camp on standby anyway, were there suspicions that Pulev was going to pull out of the fight?
boxingknockout
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 10:45

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by boxingknockout »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
boxingknockout wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
Does AIDS show up on ultrasound? :maybe:
I’m not an expert or a doctor
Nor me. Although I do remember it being well known that if you used the middle cubicle in my primary school toilet, you would definitely catch AIDS.
For us it was EVERY toilet.... I always used to hover
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23008
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by handsofstone »

Gutted Pulev is out, not that I was looking forward to this fight, I just want it out of the way, it will happen in 2018 no doubt, Takam is a solid opponent, equally as uninspiring as Pulev

95% of people going to Cardiff have no clue who Pulev is let alone Takam so they probably shouldn't get their knickers in a twist
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by asdfjkl »

Tony1244 wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
You don't lose one fight due to a failed Drug Test, and then pick up a bigger one as a result of said failed drug test. Doesn't work that way.
Ortiz didn't fail a drug test, despite I have to admit Eddy Hearn is very scared of Ortiz.
Ortiz did drugs and drugs are bad. Ok?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uh7l8dx-h8M
Not any time recently, and Eddy Hearn indeed seems to be the coward that ignores Ortiz, as expected.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

handsofstone wrote:Gutted Pulev is out, not that I was looking forward to this fight, I just want it out of the way, it will happen in 2018 no doubt, Takam is a solid opponent, equally as uninspiring as Pulev

95% of people going to Cardiff have no clue who Pulev is let alone Takam so they probably shouldn't get their knickers in a twist
This satisfies his mandatory. Hearn did a fantastic job here.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by gilgamesh »

asdfjkl wrote: Not any time recently, and Eddy Hearn indeed seems to be the coward that ignores Ortiz, as expected.
Yes, sometime recently. He just failed a drug test for his most recent scheduled fight. That's about as recent as it gets.
brian13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1853
Joined: 07 Dec 2008, 15:01

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by brian13 »

Hearn told Kugan Cassius that he had Takam on standby and he would have fought in Monaco if he didn't fight AJ. Fair play to Eddie with that move.
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24628
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by Tony1244 »

asdfjkl wrote:
Tony1244 wrote:
asdfjkl wrote: Ortiz didn't fail a drug test, despite I have to admit Eddy Hearn is very scared of Ortiz.
Ortiz did drugs and drugs are bad. Ok?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uh7l8dx-h8M
Not any time recently, and Eddy Hearn indeed seems to be the coward that ignores Ortiz, as expected.

If Ortiz doesn't want to be ignored he needs to stop doing PEDs. Like Wilder, his first few years weren't fighting the best of the best either, and he had a much better amateur pedigree.

Is Eddy Hearn now part of the Axis of Evil w/ Wilder and Wilder's promoter?
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Pulev injured?

Post by asdfjkl »

gilgamesh wrote:
asdfjkl wrote: Not any time recently, and Eddy Hearn indeed seems to be the coward that ignores Ortiz, as expected.
Yes, sometime recently. He just failed a drug test for his most recent scheduled fight. That's about as recent as it gets.
He didn't fail any drug test this year... You can act like he did, and you might find some retards who do, but Ortiz did not use any doping this year.
Post Reply