Valerie dorsett (not Howard Foster) 117-110 hyland ormond scorecard

Post Reply
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5171
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Valerie dorsett (not Howard Foster) 117-110 hyland ormond scorecard

Post by TheLeprechaun »

Terrible to see such a blatant robbery on ormond
Last edited by TheLeprechaun on 23 Oct 2017, 16:20, edited 2 times in total.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Howard Foster 117-110 hyland ormond scorecard

Post by Andrew »

Agree

Ormond won that fight, hyland doesn't seem to be a fighter capable of completing the distance successfully. He started the fight well.
Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1476
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Re: Howard Foster 117-110 hyland ormond scorecard

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

Howard has been known to post on here occasionally. Maybe he can run us through his card ? These judges are absolutely killing the credibility of the sport IMO
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: Howard Foster 117-110 hyland ormond scorecard

Post by mullenman »

I'm no expert but I had Ormond winning the last six rounds handy. Few close rounds at the start and the knockdown for hyland. Probably 8-4 ormand . Three point win due to the knockdown. Gutted for him. Had a tenner on him at 9-4 but more gutted for fighter and trainer
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Howard Foster 117-110 hyland ormond scorecard

Post by jamamb »

it disturbs me how little accountability there is for judges. even with the canelo-ggg atrocity best we got was 'it was just an off night, we support her'
3132DW
Middleweight
Posts: 1435
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 03:27

Re: Howard Foster 117-110 hyland ormond scorecard

Post by 3132DW »

jamamb wrote:it disturbs me how little accountability there is for judges. even with the canelo-ggg atrocity best we got was 'it was just an off night, we support her'
Same as Valerie Dorsett and Sucre on Sat night.

Dorsett had Burnett 70-63 up after 7. Now ZZ won 1&2 and 6 (IMO)

Andy Lee had it 57-57 - after 6 - fair reflection and she sitting 60-54 and ZZ hasn’t won a round - WTF are they watching ?
GlobalBox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2037
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 02:57

Re: Howard Foster 117-110 hyland ormond scorecard

Post by GlobalBox »

It was a very poor card, even if you allow yourself to prefer the nice shots and eye catching footwork and sometimes fast hands you cannot come up with that score card, I like Howard but it's a bad one.
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Howard Foster 117-110 hyland ormond scorecard

Post by davie »

It's one of those score cards you look at and think, ok you might be a couple rounds off how most of us scored it, you might have it a draw,maybe even at a stretch score it very narrowly in favour of Hyland

But there is no conceivable way you can score 10 rounds to Hyland. It just isn't possible as long as the person judging has 2 functioning eyes. Ormond won more than 3 rounds clearly, rounds that simply weren't "a bit of what you like", they were clear cut.

I don't believe we can keep blaming incompetence.
She can't be that shit at scoring a fight, she really can't be

**edited to account for false accusations, my point still stands though, sorry Howard.**
Last edited by davie on 23 Oct 2017, 16:41, edited 1 time in total.
craigstephen
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 97
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 20:13

Re: Howard Foster 117-110 hyland ormond scorecard

Post by craigstephen »

TheLeprechaun wrote:Terrible to see such a blatant robbery on ormond. Foster made himself look bent with that scorecard and it was a disgrace

That was judge Valerie Dorsett’s scorecard. Howard Foster scored 114-113 & if it weren’t for the knockdown it would’ve been a draw. Not offering any opinion, just stating the fact.
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5171
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: Howard Foster 117-110 hyland ormond scorecard

Post by TheLeprechaun »

craigstephen wrote:
TheLeprechaun wrote:Terrible to see such a blatant robbery on ormond. Foster made himself look bent with that scorecard and it was a disgrace

That was judge Valerie Dorsett’s scorecard. Howard Foster scored 114-113 & if it weren’t for the knockdown it would’ve been a draw. Not offering any opinion, just stating the fact.

Ooops. I thought that was foster. Apologies
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Valerie dorsett (not Howard Foster) 117-110 hyland ormond scorecard

Post by jamamb »

was hyland the a side against ormond? im assuming yes but dont know the fighters well
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5171
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: Valerie dorsett (not Howard Foster) 117-110 hyland ormond scorecard

Post by TheLeprechaun »

jamamb wrote:was hyland the a side against ormond? im assuming yes but dont know the fighters well
hyland was the a side and fighting at home.
GlobalBox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2037
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 02:57

Re: Howard Foster 117-110 hyland ormond scorecard

Post by GlobalBox »

GlobalBox wrote:It was a very poor card, even if you allow yourself to prefer the nice shots and eye catching footwork and sometimes fast hands you cannot come up with that score card, I like Howard but it's a bad one.
Apologies to Howard it seems that this was not his card.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16927
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Valerie dorsett (not Howard Foster) 117-110 hyland ormond scorecard

Post by Nightmare Roy »

Sadly I think the UK is the worst in the world for home town decisions these days.
Post Reply