Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by Ricky_ »

Stiverne is a 40 year old, inactive boxer.

He lost his title to Wilder nearly 3 years ago to Wilder, in a fight that was so conclusive it's hard to imagine a less worthy rematch in a title shot.

A few months later, Stiverne confirmed what most people suspected after the Wilder bout - that he was completely shot. In November 2015 he faced the tomato can known as Derric Rossy, a heavyweight that loses 1/3rd of his fights, and came into the fight with 4 losses from his last 6 bouts.

Rossy put Stiverne on the canvas in the first round, and made a close contest of the uneventful 10-rounder, which many fans believed he won.

That was 2 full years ago. Stiverne is a 40 year-old shot fighter, that's essentially coming out of retirement.... yet somehow we are to believe in some perverse ranking system, this guy is now the mandatory in the wake of Ortiz' failed test?

Let's all point and laugh at the WBC, who continue to shamefully desecrate what should be the most prestigious belt in the sport.
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by punchoutsb »

It's worse than that...he was the mandatory BEFORE Ortiz's failed test. He accepted step aside money for Ortiz.
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by Ossyrules »

Yeah it’s a bad situation. Can only hope wilder deals with him quickly and spectacularly and we at least come out of the fight with some promise moving forward
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by punchoutsb »

Ossyrules wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 14:18 Yeah it’s a bad situation. Can only hope wilder deals with him quickly and spectacularly and we at least come out of the fight with some promise moving forward
Can't wait for the Molina rematch the WBC are desperately trying to set :lol:
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

Shut up all of you.
Titles matter.
Especially that prestigious green belt.
Wilder/Stiverne is a legitamate championship fight.
Two of the best going at it for glory. :box:
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by Ossyrules »

punchoutsb wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 14:20
Ossyrules wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 14:18 Yeah it’s a bad situation. Can only hope wilder deals with him quickly and spectacularly and we at least come out of the fight with some promise moving forward
Can't wait for the Molina rematch the WBC are desperately trying to set :lol:
Haha don’t be the 1% optimist in me too quick!
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by Ossyrules »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 14:29 Shut up all of you.
Titles matter.
Especially that prestigious green belt.
Wilder/Stiverne is a legitamate championship fight.
Two of the best going at it for glory. :box:
Fight of the century mate
montrealsuper
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Nov 2010, 12:44

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by montrealsuper »

Stiverne obviously threw the first fight to give haymon and wilder the wbc title. Now he's owed a favor and this payday tonight is the return of favor. obviously fat stiverne knows he's not supposed to win again and he trained accordingly. expect either an early dive or another one sided beating of a punching bag.

Welcome to al haymon's world of WWE fake inhouse garbage boxing. Haymon is desperate to create a star or a fraud star. Wilder is his creation. Wilder is just a protected fraud pretender and fatso stiverne is the paid off patsy. breazeale is the next paid off patsy who will dive or tank vs wilder.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46470
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by gilgamesh »

What's surprising about this? Wilder's entire title reign has been a joke
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

Ossyrules wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 14:32
BAD INTENTIONS wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 14:29 Shut up all of you.
Titles matter.
Especially that prestigious green belt.
Wilder/Stiverne is a legitamate championship fight.
Two of the best going at it for glory. :box:
Fight of the century mate
Exactly. I love all championship fights.
They are all legitimate.

The WBC, WBO, WBA, & IBF are the perfect organizations to run the sport.
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by Ossyrules »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 15:01
Ossyrules wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 14:32
BAD INTENTIONS wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 14:29 Shut up all of you.
Titles matter.
Especially that prestigious green belt.
Wilder/Stiverne is a legitamate championship fight.
Two of the best going at it for glory. :box:
Fight of the century mate
Exactly. I love all championship fights.
They are all legitimate.

The WBC, WBO, WBA, & IBF are the perfect organizations to run the sport.
They do a great job
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46470
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by gilgamesh »

I hope you guys are just f*cking around :lol:

Surely nobody REALLY thinks it's a good idea to have 4 World Champions per weight class, 17 weight classes. That's 68 World Champions in the same sport...that's ridiculous.
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by Ossyrules »

gilgamesh wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 15:32 I hope you guys are just f*cking around :lol:

Surely nobody REALLY thinks it's a good idea to have 4 World Champions per weight class, 17 weight classes. That's 68 World Champions in the same sport...that's ridiculous.
:salut:
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9453
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by tiny_acres »

gilgamesh wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 15:32 I hope you guys are just f*cking around :lol:

Surely nobody REALLY thinks it's a good idea to have 4 World Champions per weight class, 17 weight classes. That's 68 World Champions in the same sport...that's ridiculous.
My daughter is 18. She started watching boxing with me a couple of years ago. Her first reality check in the sport was when she said how can 4 guys claim to be world champion in the same division.
I couldn't give her a reasonable answer she would accept
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46470
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by gilgamesh »

tiny_acres wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 16:01
gilgamesh wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 15:32 I hope you guys are just f*cking around :lol:

Surely nobody REALLY thinks it's a good idea to have 4 World Champions per weight class, 17 weight classes. That's 68 World Champions in the same sport...that's ridiculous.
My daughter is 18. She started watching boxing with me a couple of years ago. Her first reality check in the sport was when she said how can 4 guys claim to be world champion in the same division.
I couldn't give her a reasonable answer she would accept
Because there isn't one. It's stupid on the face of it. We understand it, and tolerate it, but I for one hate it, and would love to see us go back to only have 1 World Champion...and 7 less weight classes too for that matter...but...one step at a time :lol:
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26529
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by KiwiRider »

gilgamesh wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 15:32 I hope you guys are just f*cking around :lol:

Surely nobody REALLY thinks it's a good idea to have 4 World Champions per weight class, 17 weight classes. That's 68 World Champions in the same sport...that's ridiculous.
If you add Super Champions, Diamond Champions and NABwhatever it's over 100
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by Ossyrules »

gilgamesh wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 16:06
tiny_acres wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 16:01
gilgamesh wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 15:32 I hope you guys are just f*cking around :lol:

Surely nobody REALLY thinks it's a good idea to have 4 World Champions per weight class, 17 weight classes. That's 68 World Champions in the same sport...that's ridiculous.
My daughter is 18. She started watching boxing with me a couple of years ago. Her first reality check in the sport was when she said how can 4 guys claim to be world champion in the same division.
I couldn't give her a reasonable answer she would accept
Because there isn't one. It's stupid on the face of it. We understand it, and tolerate it, but I for one hate it, and would love to see us go back to only have 1 World Champion...and 7 less weight classes too for that matter...but...one step at a time :lol:
And then you get guys catchweighting as well :brick:
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by boxing_rocks »

tiny_acres wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 16:01
gilgamesh wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 15:32 I hope you guys are just f*cking around :lol:

Surely nobody REALLY thinks it's a good idea to have 4 World Champions per weight class, 17 weight classes. That's 68 World Champions in the same sport...that's ridiculous.
My daughter is 18. She started watching boxing with me a couple of years ago. Her first reality check in the sport was when she said how can 4 guys claim to be world champion in the same division.
I couldn't give her a reasonable answer she would accept
There is a very reasonable answer: pro boxing is not a sport.
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by Ossyrules »

boxing_rocks wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 16:11
tiny_acres wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 16:01
gilgamesh wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 15:32 I hope you guys are just f*cking around :lol:

Surely nobody REALLY thinks it's a good idea to have 4 World Champions per weight class, 17 weight classes. That's 68 World Champions in the same sport...that's ridiculous.
My daughter is 18. She started watching boxing with me a couple of years ago. Her first reality check in the sport was when she said how can 4 guys claim to be world champion in the same division.
I couldn't give her a reasonable answer she would accept
There is a very reasonable answer: pro boxing is not a sport.
At wrestling only has smackdown and raw. We have 4 of the fackers to live with
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46470
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by gilgamesh »

KiwiRider wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 16:09
gilgamesh wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 15:32 I hope you guys are just f*cking around :lol:

Surely nobody REALLY thinks it's a good idea to have 4 World Champions per weight class, 17 weight classes. That's 68 World Champions in the same sport...that's ridiculous.
If you add Super Champions, Diamond Champions and NABwhatever it's over 100
Oh yeah if you wanna count something like IBO it's over 100, then you also got WBA Regular and Interim Champions...it's an absolute joke, and it's no wonder why most casual fans don't bother to keep track of all this stuff.

I like the idea of Regional Titles like say (British Champion), (Japanese Champion), (European Champion) etc...but there should only be ONE World Champion.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9453
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by tiny_acres »

gilgamesh wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 16:13
KiwiRider wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 16:09
gilgamesh wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 15:32 I hope you guys are just f*cking around :lol:

Surely nobody REALLY thinks it's a good idea to have 4 World Champions per weight class, 17 weight classes. That's 68 World Champions in the same sport...that's ridiculous.
If you add Super Champions, Diamond Champions and NABwhatever it's over 100
Oh yeah if you wanna count something like IBO it's over 100, then you also got WBA Regular and Interim Champions...it's an absolute joke, and it's no wonder why most casual fans don't bother to keep track of all this stuff.

I like the idea of Regional Titles like say (British Champion), (Japanese Champion), (European Champion) etc...but there should only be ONE World Champion.
I would say 99% of the world agrees with you
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46470
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by gilgamesh »

tiny_acres wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 16:17
gilgamesh wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 16:13
KiwiRider wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 16:09
If you add Super Champions, Diamond Champions and NABwhatever it's over 100
Oh yeah if you wanna count something like IBO it's over 100, then you also got WBA Regular and Interim Champions...it's an absolute joke, and it's no wonder why most casual fans don't bother to keep track of all this stuff.

I like the idea of Regional Titles like say (British Champion), (Japanese Champion), (European Champion) etc...but there should only be ONE World Champion.
I would say 99% of the world agrees with you
And the other 1% collect sanctioning fees :lol:
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by Ossyrules »

gilgamesh wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 16:13
KiwiRider wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 16:09
gilgamesh wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 15:32 I hope you guys are just f*cking around :lol:

Surely nobody REALLY thinks it's a good idea to have 4 World Champions per weight class, 17 weight classes. That's 68 World Champions in the same sport...that's ridiculous.
If you add Super Champions, Diamond Champions and NABwhatever it's over 100
Oh yeah if you wanna count something like IBO it's over 100, then you also got WBA Regular and Interim Champions...it's an absolute joke, and it's no wonder why most casual fans don't bother to keep track of all this stuff.

I like the idea of Regional Titles like say (British Champion), (Japanese Champion), (European Champion) etc...but there should only be ONE World Champion.
It should be like this. Example from British point of view

Area champ (midlands, southern)
National champ (English)
Lonsdale (British)
Commonwealth
European
World

That’s basically it. Interim, gold, silver, normal, super should be scrapped. No problem with eliminators but it you shouldn’t get a belt for it.

The heavy division wouldn’t look half as bad this way either. People like wilder, Parker etc as contenders are where they should be, contenders, not alphabet champs
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by Badhusker »

punchoutsb wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 13:41 It's worse than that...he was the mandatory BEFORE Ortiz's failed test. He accepted step aside money for Ortiz.
I wish Joshua had the boys to tell Hearn he wants to fight Wilder. Wilder paid $600 K out of his own pocket to fight Ortiz. Joshua would never even mention Ortiz's name. In fact he objected to him being a mandatory for him though WBA so he could fight Pulev.

Make the best guys fight each other.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Wilder vs Stiverne is a FARCE

Post by Badhusker »

Ricky_ wrote: 04 Nov 2017, 13:39 Stiverne is a 40 year old, inactive boxer.

He lost his title to Wilder nearly 3 years ago to Wilder, in a fight that was so conclusive it's hard to imagine a less worthy rematch in a title shot.

A few months later, Stiverne confirmed what most people suspected after the Wilder bout - that he was completely shot. In November 2015 he faced the tomato can known as Derric Rossy, a heavyweight that loses 1/3rd of his fights, and came into the fight with 4 losses from his last 6 bouts.

Rossy put Stiverne on the canvas in the first round, and made a close contest of the uneventful 10-rounder, which many fans believed he won.

That was 2 full years ago. Stiverne is a 40 year-old shot fighter, that's essentially coming out of retirement.... yet somehow we are to believe in some perverse ranking system, this guy is now the mandatory in the wake of Ortiz' failed test?

Let's all point and laugh at the WBC, who continue to shamefully desecrate what should be the most prestigious belt in the sport.
At least get the facts straight dumbass.
Post Reply