Wilder vs Parker????

Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by Ossyrules »

gilgamesh wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 17:05
Ossyrules wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 16:52
gilgamesh wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 16:42
...Not sure what that means
If boxing offered me as a fan a situation in the future where there would be only 2 belts instead of 4, I would take them up on it for sure.

So I agree that 2 is too many, but it’s a damn side better than what we have now
Of course, any improvement is welcome. But why fix it half assed, when you can fix it completely.
There’s more likelyhood of getting 5 or 6 belts than there is 2, so unfortunately we can’t fix it at all!

There’s actually already 5 if you, and a lot of people do on here but I don’t personally, credit the wba normal as a world champion.

The IBO are making noises like they could become the new WBO type body...

Maybe we should enjoy 4 while we still have it :verysad:
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by Ossyrules »

ldlamb wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 17:22 I actually would choose 2 world titles, if given freedom to pick any option.

People are disposed to think the way it was when they grew up, to be he way it should be, and I guess I'm no different.

I grew up in the era of 2 titles and I liked it that way because:

1) if someone was really being ducked by one guy, they did have the other option; and

2) It allowed a good 1 or 2 year build up to huge fights as the two champs cleaned out the division, ala Leonard/Hearns, Curry/McCrory or Spinks/Qawi.
2 titles does create the opportunity of a meaningful unification fight.

It’s not even just the top belts that’s the problem, it’s the silver interim intercontinental shite as well
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by Badhusker »

marvelous marv wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 15:27 I don't know if you guys watch the videos IFL posts on youtube. But hearn was asked about this the other day and said he had never made an offer to Parker. He was not sure where the rumors were coming from.
It wouldn't be the first time Hearn lied. Parker's promoter Higgins said Hearn offered 20% of the purse to them. I'm not sure why they would make that up so I would believe them over Hearn.
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by Ossyrules »

Badhusker wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 17:29
marvelous marv wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 15:27 I don't know if you guys watch the videos IFL posts on youtube. But hearn was asked about this the other day and said he had never made an offer to Parker. He was not sure where the rumors were coming from.
It wouldn't be the first time Hearn lied. Parker's promoter Higgins said Hearn offered 20% of the purse to them. I'm not sure why they would make that up so I would believe them over Hearn.
How much is 20% though. Itd be handy to know that before it gets called a shite offer.

How much is Parker earning in his previous fights?
How much is Joshua earning?

If you know the answers to those we’ll know how much each guy roughly brings to the table
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by candyslim »

I can't see there being enough money in this fight to satisfy what the two fighters are likely to want paying. I'd like to be wrong. I'd pick Wilder but it wouldn't shock me greatly if Parker scored an upset.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13113
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Good fight. I can't pick a winner.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by jamamb »

wilder easy
drunkenpiper36
Middleweight
Posts: 1420
Joined: 22 Nov 2013, 11:13

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by drunkenpiper36 »

If the Joshua fight doesn't come off right away, I think Wilder will take on whoever he can get a match with, barring anyone getting suspended for PED use. He was on his way to Russia to fight Povetkin when he got the call that it was off... He was willing to get in the ring with Ortiz - one of the division's most feared men when the same thing happened... He's been calling out Joshua for over a year and Tyson Fury before that.. I don't think his willingness should be questioned. So yeah, Parker is a good pick if all else falls through.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9453
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by tiny_acres »

drunkenpiper36 wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 18:45 If the Joshua fight doesn't come off right away, I think Wilder will take on whoever he can get a match with, barring anyone getting suspended for PED use. He was on his way to Russia to fight Povetkin when he got the call that it was off... He was willing to get in the ring with Ortiz - one of the division's most feared men when the same thing happened... He's been calling out Joshua for over a year and Tyson Fury before that.. I don't think his willingness should be questioned. So yeah, Parker is a good pick if all else falls through.
Good post
drunkenpiper36
Middleweight
Posts: 1420
Joined: 22 Nov 2013, 11:13

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by drunkenpiper36 »

tiny_acres wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 18:54
drunkenpiper36 wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 18:45 If the Joshua fight doesn't come off right away, I think Wilder will take on whoever he can get a match with, barring anyone getting suspended for PED use. He was on his way to Russia to fight Povetkin when he got the call that it was off... He was willing to get in the ring with Ortiz - one of the division's most feared men when the same thing happened... He's been calling out Joshua for over a year and Tyson Fury before that.. I don't think his willingness should be questioned. So yeah, Parker is a good pick if all else falls through.
Good post
Thanks :)
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by asdfjkl »

Ossyrules wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 17:38
Badhusker wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 17:29
marvelous marv wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 15:27 I don't know if you guys watch the videos IFL posts on youtube. But hearn was asked about this the other day and said he had never made an offer to Parker. He was not sure where the rumors were coming from.
It wouldn't be the first time Hearn lied. Parker's promoter Higgins said Hearn offered 20% of the purse to them. I'm not sure why they would make that up so I would believe them over Hearn.
How much is 20% though. Itd be handy to know that before it gets called a shite offer.

How much is Parker earning in his previous fights?
How much is Joshua earning?

If you know the answers to those we’ll know how much each guy roughly brings to the table
I would gladly accept 20% if I was Parker actually, Parker deserves a better payday as Wilder for example, but this much better?
nmhz
Welterweight
Posts: 257
Joined: 14 Jun 2016, 01:24

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by nmhz »

Parker would outbox Wilder easily for a UD unless Deontay can knock him out
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by asdfjkl »

drunkenpiper36 wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 18:56
tiny_acres wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 18:54
drunkenpiper36 wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 18:45 If the Joshua fight doesn't come off right away, I think Wilder will take on whoever he can get a match with, barring anyone getting suspended for PED use. He was on his way to Russia to fight Povetkin when he got the call that it was off... He was willing to get in the ring with Ortiz - one of the division's most feared men when the same thing happened... He's been calling out Joshua for over a year and Tyson Fury before that.. I don't think his willingness should be questioned. So yeah, Parker is a good pick if all else falls through.
Good post
Thanks :)
Yea, except that he was being out of shape, celebrating holiday in the UK knowing months beforehand the fight would never happen. Hasn't proved himself in his entire carreer and I very much doubt he will fight Parker without massive unfair advantages.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by Badhusker »

asdfjkl wrote: 06 Nov 2017, 00:27
drunkenpiper36 wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 18:56
tiny_acres wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 18:54
Good post
Thanks :)
Yea, except that he was being out of shape, celebrating holiday in the UK knowing months beforehand the fight would never happen. Hasn't proved himself in his entire carreer and I very much doubt he will fight Parker without massive unfair advantages.
:zzz:
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by Lackeos »

asdfjkl wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 21:56 I would gladly accept 20% if I was Parker actually, Parker deserves a better payday as Wilder for example, but this much better?
Then... you would play Parker's hand quite badly. You're saying that if you were the highest-ranked heavyweight 25 years or under, you had a belt and tons of potential to make tens of millions of dollars in your career, and you deserved like 45% of the purse, then your dumbass would GLADLY accept 20%? You would be like the dumbest version of Joseph Parker that ever Joseph Parkered. Like if someone had a treasury bond worth $10,000 and you're like "If I were you, I would gladly sell that bond for $3,000 cold hard cash. ACTUALLY... I would trade it for three magical beans."
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9453
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by tiny_acres »

Lackeos wrote: 06 Nov 2017, 19:52
asdfjkl wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 21:56 I would gladly accept 20% if I was Parker actually, Parker deserves a better payday as Wilder for example, but this much better?
Then... you would play Parker's hand quite badly. You're saying that if you were the highest-ranked heavyweight 25 years or under, you had a belt and tons of potential to make tens of millions of dollars in your career, and you deserved like 45% of the purse, then your dumbass would GLADLY accept 20%? You would be like the dumbest version of Joseph Parker that ever Joseph Parkered. Like if someone had a treasury bond worth $10,000 and you're like "If I were you, I would gladly sell that bond for $3,000 cold hard cash. ACTUALLY... I would trade it for three magical beans."
Lackeys you are talking the guy that says Wilder deserves only 3 or 4%
He is a child who has no concept of reality and does nothing but hate on any fighter he doesn't like.
He has no sense of objectivity or reality
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7255
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by Oiky »

Parker is the better boxer but I'd still pick Wilder to win by KO
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by asdfjkl »

tiny_acres wrote: 06 Nov 2017, 20:00
Lackeos wrote: 06 Nov 2017, 19:52
asdfjkl wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 21:56 I would gladly accept 20% if I was Parker actually, Parker deserves a better payday as Wilder for example, but this much better?
Then... you would play Parker's hand quite badly. You're saying that if you were the highest-ranked heavyweight 25 years or under, you had a belt and tons of potential to make tens of millions of dollars in your career, and you deserved like 45% of the purse, then your dumbass would GLADLY accept 20%? You would be like the dumbest version of Joseph Parker that ever Joseph Parkered. Like if someone had a treasury bond worth $10,000 and you're like "If I were you, I would gladly sell that bond for $3,000 cold hard cash. ACTUALLY... I would trade it for three magical beans."
Lackeys you are talking the guy that says Wilder deserves only 3 or 4%
He is a child who has no concept of reality and does nothing but hate on any fighter he doesn't like.
He has no sense of objectivity or reality
I like Parker a lot actually, but we can all see what happens when he steps up against guys Wilder never dared to fight. Pretty much nothing happens, after Takam, Hughie and Andy Ruiz his pockets are still quite empty. He doesn't have the media in his pockets like that bumfighter has and neither like AJ has. So good luck, but without AJ he won't achieve a lot. Molina would have never regretted it today, if he fought Wilder for free back then either. Same thing for Duhaupas, but I guess such things are too complicated for guys like you. Breazeale, Whyte, name them will also never regret fighting AJ for peanuts.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

KiwiRider wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 16:30
Ossyrules wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 15:51
I think it highlights also that 4 belts is too many. Parker should be a contender working his way up and learning, but now he has to masquerade as a champ and learn on the job, so the whole situation isn’t quite as easy as it could be for him
Any more than one belt is too many for a world champion.
Parker is an accidental champion. No one thought he could beat Takem. The opportunity came up, Takem thought he was in for an easy night, a very decent payday and didn't mind travelling. That win bumped Parker up to #1 contender and the belt became vacant. Who can blame him for giving it a go? So here he is, a target with a belt. Vastly inexperienced, small for the current crop, and way over his head :cry:
Bit he is giving it a go, it's taxing being a fan as every fight for him seems 50/50 or worse. But as someone has said, Wilder at 25 was not fighting at nearly as high a level as little Joey Parker- the achitypical underdog. In fact, I don't think Wilder has fought anyone as lively as Takem yet.
No one thought he could beat takam? Parker was favored by a good bit in that fight.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by jamamb »

ya it was the takam fight when a lot of ppl first starting realizing hes okay but nothing special.hed been expected by most to boss that. i had it a draw actually.

i think parker vs wilder or aj is pretty much a sure thing loss so id want big, big money if i were on his side. then again, jp with how hes looked in recent fights could lose before it ever gets to that.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by asdfjkl »

Would be Parker his most easy fight in quite some time, somehow Wilder would never dare this, as we all know.
Grailer
Welterweight
Posts: 296
Joined: 19 Sep 2015, 00:49

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by Grailer »

Parker dropped Wilder in sparring so I doubt Wilder will fight Parker
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9010
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by Syntax Error »

Ossyrules wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 15:51
KiwiRider wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 15:48
Lackeos wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 15:09 Parker doesn't need this headache. He's still only 25, and a fight with a top 3 heavyweight is not a good career move for him right now. He is best off taking winnable fights and gradually improving over time, a.k.a. the Calzaghe route. Wilder has never had the courage to fight a top 3 heavyweight, especially by the green young age of 25. When Wilder was Parker's age, he was fighting Damon Reed, Dominique Alexander, and Daniel Cota.

But since Wilder is 32 and totally ready for a proper challenge, I would certainly like to see him fight Joshua, Povetkin, Ortiz, or Pulev (or Tyson Fury). Apart from that, I think the WBC needs to put together an eliminator of respectable contenders to offer Wilder a better challenger. I would be happy with an eliminator that featured any combination of Whyte, Ruiz, Takam, Wach, Kabayel, and Kownacki (or fighters not presently ranked by the WBC, like Hammer and Miller).
I tend to agree. Parker is very green and on top of what you said, he also does not have an Am pedegree either. He needs to build up better opponents to make a fight with AJ or Wilder competitive. Maybe someone like Brazeale or anyone tall and game. Let's not forget that compared to Wilder and AJ, Parker is pretty short as well. I've seen pictures of him standing next to both and it's quite a difference. Parker is about the same size as Bellew and Haye. He struggled with Cojanu who is tall. The only problem is that Parker is not one to dodge fights, Huey Fury being a prime example. He could have ditched that after Fury hurt his back but didn't.
I think it highlights also that 4 belts is too many. Parker should be a contender working his way up and learning, but now he has to masquerade as a champ and learn on the job, so the whole situation isn’t quite as easy as it could be for him
Anthony Joshua is in the same position.

Because there are so many belts, the talent pool is thin & he has now found himself as champion whilst he is still learning.

He proved against Wladimir that he is tough, willing & game, but he is not the finished article yet & because he is such a big draw & a PPV attraction, he will fight so infrequently that he might never truly learn his trade.
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Wilder vs Parker????

Post by Ossyrules »

Syntax Error wrote: 07 Nov 2017, 01:41
Ossyrules wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 15:51
KiwiRider wrote: 05 Nov 2017, 15:48
I tend to agree. Parker is very green and on top of what you said, he also does not have an Am pedegree either. He needs to build up better opponents to make a fight with AJ or Wilder competitive. Maybe someone like Brazeale or anyone tall and game. Let's not forget that compared to Wilder and AJ, Parker is pretty short as well. I've seen pictures of him standing next to both and it's quite a difference. Parker is about the same size as Bellew and Haye. He struggled with Cojanu who is tall. The only problem is that Parker is not one to dodge fights, Huey Fury being a prime example. He could have ditched that after Fury hurt his back but didn't.
I think it highlights also that 4 belts is too many. Parker should be a contender working his way up and learning, but now he has to masquerade as a champ and learn on the job, so the whole situation isn’t quite as easy as it could be for him
Anthony Joshua is in the same position.

Because there are so many belts, the talent pool is thin & he has now found himself as champion whilst he is still learning.

He proved against Wladimir that he is tough, willing & game, but he is not the finished article yet & because he is such a big draw & a PPV attraction, he will fight so infrequently that he might never truly learn his trade.
Completely agree mate
Post Reply