Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post Reply
TheLeprechaun
Middleweight
Posts: 5135
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by TheLeprechaun »

He was winning tournaments and competing in the olympics. He then turned pro and got starched at British level.

His style was suited to the amateurs. He handled Josh Taylor on several occasions according to reports. You'd have to have been living on Mars for the last couple of years to pick him to beat Taylor in a fight today.

He may not have won the olympics, but he was good enough to compete at world level as an amateur.

It seems like there is a pressure on good amateurs to turn pro. It just feels like they should turn over rather than stay amateur. In this case, I think it wasn't the best move. Financially, he probably would have made more from sponsorship and probably from Team GB salary.

Ogogo is another one. He was going to the opening of an envelope around the time of the Olympics and you couldn't watch a youtube video without seeing the chap talking about a Teryaki Subway.

That's far from the case now - It seems like he went into witness protection since the cunningham loss. Nowhere to be seen.

I'd add Frankie Gavin to the list but he probably wouldn't have had the discipline to have any longevity as an amateur. He already got chucked out of the olympics.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26483
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by KiwiRider »

It really is hit and miss who makes it from an Olympic level to a pro title holder. Some of those skilled Am's get blasted through by pro journeymen who have no respect for their jab or skillset. I never thought Loma would make a good pro :doh: he looked set for a 3rd Olympic and retirement :oops:
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7853
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by Wales »

To be fair he was 27/28 when he turned pro and he'd had a good run in the amateur scene competing in every major tournament. It was the right time for him to try his hand in the pro game. Unfortunately it didn't work out for him, as it doesn't for many. Ultimately every boxer wants to win a professional world title and make millions of pounds in the process.
Manchester Massive
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 371
Joined: 29 May 2008, 18:34

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by Manchester Massive »

Not got a bad lifestyle though, paid for doing what he loves, based in Marbella, at least he had a go
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27448
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by stujones »

It seems now more than ever that it is easy enough to go back to the amateur ranks should a fighter wish, didn't we have established pros try out for the Olympics last year. I think it was fair enough for him to give it a go. I was quite surprised to see so many promoters clamour for his signature. He was one amateur who style never looked suited to the pros - always looked like he lacked the pop in his punches to make it too the top. He's done okay, has still done better than the majority of pro's. He's probably good enough for a decent belt (such as Commonwealth) if he has the right opponent etc, he's a good honest pro - he's a bit of a strange one where whilst I don't think he is quite good enough to win a British title, he is probably has the style to be competitive and not look leagues below European Level. What I am saying is while I would see 116-112 type defeats at British title level, I could see a similar result at European Level. It's the power that lets him down more than anything.
littlepug
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5351
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 07:17

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by littlepug »

If he hadn't of turned pro he would of always wished he had, everyone wants to be a champ but it doesn't make you any less of a fighter if you don't make it
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27448
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by stujones »

littlepug wrote: 07 Nov 2017, 05:35 If he hadn't of turned pro he would of always wished he had, everyone wants to be a champ but it doesn't make you any less of a fighter if you don't make it
I agree, and he could always go back now - but not sure he would want to and how he would fit in.
TheLeprechaun
Middleweight
Posts: 5135
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by TheLeprechaun »

stujones wrote: 07 Nov 2017, 05:38
littlepug wrote: 07 Nov 2017, 05:35 If he hadn't of turned pro he would of always wished he had, everyone wants to be a champ but it doesn't make you any less of a fighter if you don't make it
I agree, and he could always go back now - but not sure he would want to and how he would fit in.
I thought you can't go back amateur once you've turned pro?
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27448
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by stujones »

TheLeprechaun wrote: 07 Nov 2017, 06:07
stujones wrote: 07 Nov 2017, 05:38
littlepug wrote: 07 Nov 2017, 05:35 If he hadn't of turned pro he would of always wished he had, everyone wants to be a champ but it doesn't make you any less of a fighter if you don't make it
I agree, and he could always go back now - but not sure he would want to and how he would fit in.
I thought you can't go back amateur once you've turned pro?
Didn't N'dam try to fight at the Olympics in Rio?
littlepug
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5351
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 07:17

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by littlepug »

TheLeprechaun wrote: 07 Nov 2017, 06:07
stujones wrote: 07 Nov 2017, 05:38
littlepug wrote: 07 Nov 2017, 05:35 If he hadn't of turned pro he would of always wished he had, everyone wants to be a champ but it doesn't make you any less of a fighter if you don't make it
I agree, and he could always go back now - but not sure he would want to and how he would fit in.
I thought you can't go back amateur once you've turned pro?
your allowed to go back if you've not had more than about 3 pro fights, Callum D'eath went back after going pro
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7224
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by Oiky »

Isn't much cop as a pro is he

Least he gave it a shot

You never know how people will do in the paid ranks
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by TheCobra »

He would never have known without trying. I applaud anyone who gives the pro game a go.
davie
Cruiserweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by davie »

Hindsight is a wonderful thing.

But some guys at amateur it will be apparent if they are well suited to the pros or not.
I don't watch much amateur boxing but from his first pro fight it was obvious to myself and a few others on here that he wouldn't go that far as a pro. He just didn't look that good.
But as usual, the sky PR team were talking about the route to world honours as if it was a foregone conclusion for the Olympic team captain
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by jamamb »

its interesting how some top ams just cant cut it as pros. i watched some of stalker in the ams and while he wasnt amazing it also wasnt like 'wow, this guy wont make it at all or even be brit level as a pro'. if i went under a rock for 5 years and someone told me he won british and euro titles and challenged for a wba secondary belt i wouldn't have really been surprised.

what are the things to look for to see pro potential?
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28310
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by Coco »

He hasn't exactly been starched but it is apparent he is domestic level.
At 28 I doubt he would have kept in the amateur squad for too much longer.
What options did he have? He has given it a go and hardly disgraced himself, he dared to dream.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27448
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by stujones »

Coco wrote: 07 Nov 2017, 15:22 He hasn't exactly been starched but it is apparent he is domestic level.
At 28 I doubt he would have kept in the amateur squad for too much longer.
What options did he have? He has given it a go and hardly disgraced himself, he dared to dream.
Yes, couldn't he give the Olympics another go if he wanted to - or was I dream that pro's are allowed to fight at Olympics.

He reminds me a bit of Peter McDonagh - a solid pro, capable of giving anyone a fight at European Level, but probably not quite good enough to win a British title.
Boxing Prospect
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by Boxing Prospect »

stujones wrote: 07 Nov 2017, 06:45
TheLeprechaun wrote: 07 Nov 2017, 06:07
stujones wrote: 07 Nov 2017, 05:38

I agree, and he could always go back now - but not sure he would want to and how he would fit in.
I thought you can't go back amateur once you've turned pro?
Didn't N'dam try to fight at the Olympics in Rio?
N'Dam and Amnat, among others, both competed at Rio.
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by leejonesjnr »

Nah. Why would he?
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11626
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by Taansend »

TheLeprechaun wrote: 07 Nov 2017, 06:07
stujones wrote: 07 Nov 2017, 05:38
littlepug wrote: 07 Nov 2017, 05:35 If he hadn't of turned pro he would of always wished he had, everyone wants to be a champ but it doesn't make you any less of a fighter if you don't make it
I agree, and he could always go back now - but not sure he would want to and how he would fit in.
I thought you can't go back amateur once you've turned pro?
Rocky Marciano turned pro, his trainer didn't like what he saw so he went back to the amateurs, won and lost a few then had his 2nd pro fight.
Vincent stevenson
Super Middleweight
Posts: 154
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 11:15

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by Vincent stevenson »

Interesting one this. When tom was thinking about turning over my brother paul and me sat him down and gave him all the pros and cons about professional boxing. Baring in mind that he had a fantastic offer on the table off gb to go and coach up in sheffield. But tom decided to chase his dreams and it was a brave decision to be fair. He could have chosen the easy option and gone to gb on very very good wages but he was and always will be super brave.
7 fights later we parted company on very good terms and tom went to spain . His career im sure tom will admit has not lived up to his unbelievable amateur one. But he can still be super proud of himself. If tom had the time over again i know for a fact he would have made the same decision because thats what type of man he is
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7224
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by Oiky »

Vincent stevenson wrote: 08 Nov 2017, 16:45 Interesting one this. When tom was thinking about turning over my brother paul and me sat him down and gave him all the pros and cons about professional boxing. Baring in mind that he had a fantastic offer on the table off gb to go and coach up in sheffield. But tom decided to chase his dreams and it was a brave decision to be fair. He could have chosen the easy option and gone to gb on very very good wages but he was and always will be super brave.
7 fights later we parted company on very good terms and tom went to spain . His career im sure tom will admit has not lived up to his unbelievable amateur one. But he can still be super proud of himself. If tom had the time over again i know for a fact he would have made the same decision because thats what type of man he is
Fair play to him
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7853
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by Wales »

stujones wrote: 07 Nov 2017, 16:33

He reminds me a bit of Peter McDonagh
Says it all. Such a shame .
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by BitPlayer »

littlepug wrote: 07 Nov 2017, 05:35 If he hadn't of turned pro he would of always wished he had, everyone wants to be a champ but it doesn't make you any less of a fighter if you don't make it
I think that's true, it might not always work out but you have to try.
littlepug
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5351
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 07:17

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by littlepug »

Wales wrote: 12 Nov 2017, 02:54
stujones wrote: 07 Nov 2017, 16:33

He reminds me a bit of Peter McDonagh
Says it all. Such a shame .
I wouldn't say its a shame, a good amateur pedigree guarantees absolutely nothing in the pros, he gave his best and was better than some and not as good as others but at the very least he has embedded himself into part of boxings history, and being able to say "I was a professional boxer" is something he can hold onto forever.
In the know 85
Super Lightweight
Posts: 352
Joined: 05 Jul 2016, 18:32

Re: Should Tom Stalker have stayed amateur?

Post by In the know 85 »

Defo shouldn't have turned pro, of all that made the transition my opinion was that he's the worst of them all, just because he was the gb captain his ability was blown out of all proportion he can't punch himself out of a wet paper bag, the same comments apply to frankie gavin, everybody was saying how good he was going to be I myself could never see it.
Post Reply