Sit Back And Marvel ... Rigondeaux v Lomachenko
Sit Back And Marvel ... Rigondeaux v Lomachenko
Great match up but a weight adavantage that's hard not to notice.
Has there been a change of heart toward this fight ?
Lomachenko is a 6/1 favorite .. is that too high ?
Has there been a change of heart toward this fight ?
Lomachenko is a 6/1 favorite .. is that too high ?
-
tigermoth87
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1794
- Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23
Re: Sit Back And Marvel ... Rigondeaux v Lomachenko
I think Loma stops him.
Rigo has always been chinny, even against poor punchers. He's been lucky so far he's managed to avoid any real KO artist. Loma isn't one punch KO but he's got more pop than most of Rigo's opponents. He'll stop him in the mid rounds.
Rigo has always been chinny, even against poor punchers. He's been lucky so far he's managed to avoid any real KO artist. Loma isn't one punch KO but he's got more pop than most of Rigo's opponents. He'll stop him in the mid rounds.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Sit Back And Marvel ... Rigondeaux v Lomachenko
I don't think size will matter in this one. That's too high. More like -175.
Re: Sit Back And Marvel ... Rigondeaux v Lomachenko
Yea its a little too high, I too, don't think size will matter much here. Also the weight jump might even be good for Rigo being that he's 37 yrs. old. He looks like a beast in his recent training camp clips.
Re: Sit Back And Marvel ... Rigondeaux v Lomachenko
these two deserve the focus that floyd vs mcbum recieved.
this is an outstanding contest imo.
this is an outstanding contest imo.
Re: Sit Back And Marvel ... Rigondeaux v Lomachenko
these two deserve the focus that floyd vs mcbum recieved.
this is an outstanding contest imo.
this is an outstanding contest imo.
-
tigermoth87
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1794
- Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23
Re: Sit Back And Marvel ... Rigondeaux v Lomachenko
i feel like it might be awful tbh. rigo being ultra defensive and loma just edging most rounds by throwing more (prob mostly those tapping shots) but not really landing much.a boring ud in which rigo has little offense and lomas offence looks ineffectual.
loma really good but he dicks around to much for me. his fight with the thai guy in particular was just a totally bizarre display of fornicating around. he couldve stopped that guy earlish yet when hed hurt the thai hed decide to immediately start circling nonstop and pranzing around with a self satisfied smile like a tool.i dont find him much better to watch than rig.
in a division full of action fighters he stinks it up for me. also im not convinced hes thebest at 130 like like others are, berchelt and davis are really good and i think would beat everyone hes faced.
loma really good but he dicks around to much for me. his fight with the thai guy in particular was just a totally bizarre display of fornicating around. he couldve stopped that guy earlish yet when hed hurt the thai hed decide to immediately start circling nonstop and pranzing around with a self satisfied smile like a tool.i dont find him much better to watch than rig.
in a division full of action fighters he stinks it up for me. also im not convinced hes thebest at 130 like like others are, berchelt and davis are really good and i think would beat everyone hes faced.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Sit Back And Marvel ... Rigondeaux v Lomachenko
I think that i agree with Jamamb. My initial feeling when hearing that this fight was signed was excitement. But then I started picturing the action and in my mind, I'm not sure that this fight is going to be very good. For the diehard, we will appreciate the skill level on display. But one of the two fighters is going to have to sell out and take some chances in order to make this an exciting fight. If it turns into a counter punch fest then YAWN. There's nothing i hate more than a counter punch fight for 12 rounds where one guy spends the whole round daring the other guy to throw anything but a jab.
I hope that i'm wrong.
I hope that i'm wrong.
Re: Sit Back And Marvel ... Rigondeaux v Lomachenko
I think it may be better than we think. Imo the pressure is more on Loma to perform well especially since he has a distinct size and age advantage. I think he will press the action more than he usually does. Rigo can always use the excuse the weight jump was too much, especially at this stage of his career.
Re: Sit Back And Marvel ... Rigondeaux v Lomachenko
Re: Sit Back And Marvel ... Rigondeaux v Lomachenko
I feel the same about Loma, too much unnecessary movement, much prefer the more economical style of Rigo and think he has a real shot at winning thisjamamb wrote: ↑14 Nov 2017, 03:54 i feel like it might be awful tbh. rigo being ultra defensive and loma just edging most rounds by throwing more (prob mostly those tapping shots) but not really landing much.a boring ud in which rigo has little offense and lomas offence looks ineffectual.
loma really good but he dicks around to much for me. his fight with the thai guy in particular was just a totally bizarre display of effing around. he couldve stopped that guy earlish yet when hed hurt the thai hed decide to immediately start circling nonstop and pranzing around with a self satisfied smile like a tool.i dont find him much better to watch than rig.
in a division full of action fighters he stinks it up for me. also im not convinced hes thebest at 130 like like others are, berchelt and davis are really good and i think would beat everyone hes faced.
-
ClivePatrickLyons
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 2811
- Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10
Re: Sit Back And Marvel ... Rigondeaux v Lomachenko
Rigo will win un dec 
Re: Sit Back And Marvel ... Rigondeaux v Lomachenko
Dream on.. He's getting his butt kicked in.
Re: Sit Back And Marvel ... Rigondeaux v Lomachenko
I’m on the same page as you matejamamb wrote: ↑14 Nov 2017, 03:54 i feel like it might be awful tbh. rigo being ultra defensive and loma just edging most rounds by throwing more (prob mostly those tapping shots) but not really landing much.a boring ud in which rigo has little offense and lomas offence looks ineffectual.
loma really good but he dicks around to much for me. his fight with the thai guy in particular was just a totally bizarre display of effing around. he couldve stopped that guy earlish yet when hed hurt the thai hed decide to immediately start circling nonstop and pranzing around with a self satisfied smile like a tool.i dont find him much better to watch than rig.
in a division full of action fighters he stinks it up for me. also im not convinced hes thebest at 130 like like others are, berchelt and davis are really good and i think would beat everyone hes faced.
Re: Sit Back And Marvel ... Rigondeaux v Lomachenko
In terms of technique & physical atributes arguably the best fight ever. This is boxings elite. I dont want to hear nothing about how boring rigo is, so was floyd, but no one can say that they are not techniquly outstanding.
There have been rarly boxer who were super athletic and super techniquly.
Pernell, mayweather, robinson, leonard, jones, rigondeaux, ali, mosley, lomachenko. 9 come to my mind, if i d think further a couple more. But 10-20 boxer out of 1000000 boxer who boxed since 1900. This is an ultra rare list. N now we get the ultra rare oppurtunity to witness 2 of them to fight each other. Rare, phenomenal, people dont realize.
There have been rarly boxer who were super athletic and super techniquly.
Pernell, mayweather, robinson, leonard, jones, rigondeaux, ali, mosley, lomachenko. 9 come to my mind, if i d think further a couple more. But 10-20 boxer out of 1000000 boxer who boxed since 1900. This is an ultra rare list. N now we get the ultra rare oppurtunity to witness 2 of them to fight each other. Rare, phenomenal, people dont realize.
Re: Sit Back And Marvel ... Rigondeaux v Lomachenko
Techniquly speaking, a lot of us do.Jip wrote: ↑15 Nov 2017, 10:37 In terms of technique & physical atributes arguably the best fight ever. This is boxings elite. I dont want to hear nothing about how boring rigo is, so was floyd, but no one can say that they are not techniquly outstanding.
There have been rarly boxer who were super athletic and super techniquly.
Pernell, mayweather, robinson, leonard, jones, rigondeaux, ali, mosley, lomachenko. 9 come to my mind, if i d think further a couple more. But 10-20 boxer out of 1000000 boxer who boxed since 1900. This is an ultra rare list. N now we get the ultra rare oppurtunity to witness 2 of them to fight each other. Rare, phenomenal, people dont realize.
Re: Sit Back And Marvel ... Rigondeaux v Lomachenko
Yeah, very well put Tanz but let's hope their misgivings are unfounded. I prefer to be optimistic and look forward to a techniqul master-class.
-
danconnollyeire
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31
Re: Sit Back And Marvel ... Rigondeaux v Lomachenko
Too phenomenal technically fighters... will case an absolute stinker of a fight. It'll be a non-action chess game
Re: Sit Back And Marvel ... Rigondeaux v Lomachenko
Sometimes even chess games are entertaining when bithare high level and dont miss all the time.
Re: Sit Back And Marvel ... Rigondeaux v Lomachenko
the analogy would be more suited to describe two extremely entertaining fighters being matched and then ppl expecting a snoozer.in rigo for exampke we have a notoriously boring fighter, so his part would be like having a boring negative lover, and then matching him with an average at best lover entertainment wise. of course its reasonable not to expect fireworks, even if some thrusts, carresses, etc are tehnically proficient.
Re: Sit Back And Marvel ... Rigondeaux v Lomachenko
Loma has been very entertaining latly. Lighting combos. Great footwork. Tkos.