Fights that didn't happen?
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Fights that didn't happen?
Calzaghe was close to fighting Dawson after Jones. That would have been really good.
Re: Fights that didn't happen?
I agree with you but the fight pavlik got instead was Hopkins, and I think in retrospect we probably didn’t miss out on anything too baddirk2686 wrote: ↑16 Nov 2017, 05:57 For me Froch retiring when DeGale was number one contender was slightly different to Calzaghe. Froch went out by knocking out a guy in a fight everyone wanted and that guy had beaten DeGale. Calzaghe beat a shot Roy Jones in a horrible fight that nobody wanted.
Thing is, instead of the Jones fight, the one that got away for Joe wasn't Froch; it was Kelly Pavlik. He was seen as an absolute monster at the time; battered Miranda, stopped Taylor, beat him in a rematch after moving up in weight. Joe really could have ended up getting the credit that went to Hopkins.
Re: Fights that didn't happen?
Also, Floyd vs any of Margarito, Williams, Cotto or Mosley in the three years after he beat Judah. 147 was on fire at that time. You have to give him the De La Hoya fight but it was very disappointing that we got Hatton, Marquez and Baldomir instead of the above who were all at the top of their game.
Mosley and Cotto were game but clearly past their best when it happened; Marg and Williams obviously never will.
Mosley and Cotto were game but clearly past their best when it happened; Marg and Williams obviously never will.
Re: Fights that didn't happen?
I know but I think it would have added some badly needed credibility to Calzaghe's record.Ossyrules wrote: ↑16 Nov 2017, 06:02I agree with you but the fight pavlik got instead was Hopkins, and I think in retrospect we probably didn’t miss out on anything too baddirk2686 wrote: ↑16 Nov 2017, 05:57 For me Froch retiring when DeGale was number one contender was slightly different to Calzaghe. Froch went out by knocking out a guy in a fight everyone wanted and that guy had beaten DeGale. Calzaghe beat a shot Roy Jones in a horrible fight that nobody wanted.
Thing is, instead of the Jones fight, the one that got away for Joe wasn't Froch; it was Kelly Pavlik. He was seen as an absolute monster at the time; battered Miranda, stopped Taylor, beat him in a rematch after moving up in weight. Joe really could have ended up getting the credit that went to Hopkins.
He spent a career fighting for recognition and being fed on a diet of horrible WBO defences against nobodies. Finally got the breakout fight against Lacy, and little did we know he only had five fights left, three of which (Bika, Manfredo and Jones) were awful.
Pavlik was a serious name at the time. Would have been so much better than Jones. I remember at the time people saying in time all we'll remember is Joe beat Roy Jones Jnr; it's not happened. Everyone still knows it was a shadow of Roy.
Re: Fights that didn't happen?
Yes you’re right. It’s better to beat someone than let someone else expose them, namely Hopkinsdirk2686 wrote: ↑16 Nov 2017, 06:06I know but I think it would have added some badly needed credibility to Calzaghe's record.Ossyrules wrote: ↑16 Nov 2017, 06:02I agree with you but the fight pavlik got instead was Hopkins, and I think in retrospect we probably didn’t miss out on anything too baddirk2686 wrote: ↑16 Nov 2017, 05:57 For me Froch retiring when DeGale was number one contender was slightly different to Calzaghe. Froch went out by knocking out a guy in a fight everyone wanted and that guy had beaten DeGale. Calzaghe beat a shot Roy Jones in a horrible fight that nobody wanted.
Thing is, instead of the Jones fight, the one that got away for Joe wasn't Froch; it was Kelly Pavlik. He was seen as an absolute monster at the time; battered Miranda, stopped Taylor, beat him in a rematch after moving up in weight. Joe really could have ended up getting the credit that went to Hopkins.
He spent a career fighting for recognition and being fed on a diet of horrible WBO defences against nobodies. Finally got the breakout fight against Lacy, and little did we know he only had five fights left, three of which (Bika, Manfredo and Jones) were awful.
Pavlik was a serious name at the time. Would have been so much better than Jones. I remember at the time people saying in time all we'll remember is Joe beat Roy Jones Jnr; it's not happened. Everyone still knows it was a shadow of Roy.
I just meant that Hopkins vs Calzaghe and then Pavlik after showed that Pavlik was a level below at 175 to cause Calzaghe too much bother. Pavlik was like a smaller poorer version of Kessler for me. Straight puncher, not too much variety. Technically solid etc
Re: Fights that didn't happen?
Bruno v Mason, also Scott Harrison v Ponce De Leon was close to happening
Re: Fights that didn't happen?
Benn v Duran/Leonard was being talked about but then Benn fought Barkley and it all went quiet
Re: Fights that didn't happen?
-
PredatorHayds
- Welterweight
- Posts: 4886
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23
Re: Fights that didn't happen?
Beat me to it.Datsue wrote: ↑16 Nov 2017, 05:56 I'll add one of those fights that were blindingly obvious but endlessly deferred in a "We need to build it up" way:
Juan Manuel Lopez vs Yuri Gamboa.
I mean, JML kept being exposed as an enormo weight-drainery one-dimensional dude who got flattered by his marketing & Gamboa kept getting floored by nobodies before drifting off in a haze of boredom, but for like a year it was the best trade fight in the sport & if a little less greed were involved could've perhaps led to some sort of trilogy.
This was the biggest fight in boxing for a period.
Still can’t believe it didn’t happen. Same promotional outfit, same TV network and fought on same shows.
Even Setanta where building the fight in this country.
Neither fighter achieved anywhere near the notoriety they would of if this fight happened.
Re: Fights that didn't happen?
One of the things with 'fights that never happened' debates are that there will always be some fights which don't happen, (you can't fight everyone), but occasionally big fights don't happen because even bigger fights do happen in their place.PredatorHayds wrote: ↑16 Nov 2017, 06:54Beat me to it.Datsue wrote: ↑16 Nov 2017, 05:56 I'll add one of those fights that were blindingly obvious but endlessly deferred in a "We need to build it up" way:
Juan Manuel Lopez vs Yuri Gamboa.
I mean, JML kept being exposed as an enormo weight-drainery one-dimensional dude who got flattered by his marketing & Gamboa kept getting floored by nobodies before drifting off in a haze of boredom, but for like a year it was the best trade fight in the sport & if a little less greed were involved could've perhaps led to some sort of trilogy.
This was the biggest fight in boxing for a period.
Still can’t believe it didn’t happen. Same promotional outfit, same TV network and fought on same shows.
Even Setanta where building the fight in this country.
Neither fighter achieved anywhere near the notoriety they would of if this fight happened.
Lopez Gamboa is an exception because by far and away it was the biggest fight for both.
-
Bigdogsnose
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1436
- Joined: 02 Dec 2013, 08:36
Re: Fights that didn't happen?
yeah see what you're saying - probably missed each other at middleweight by a couple of years.Ossyrules wrote: ↑16 Nov 2017, 05:38I don’t think Hopkins vs Toney was ever truly on short of Hopkins jumping a weight class or 2. Not while Toney was around his prime anywayBigdogsnose wrote: ↑16 Nov 2017, 03:27 Domestic
Hatton v witter.
The whole middleweight scene of a few year back... Barker, Murray, macklin ... criminal they never fought each other.
Prime herbie hide v Frank Bruno (think there heavyweight careers just over lapped)
Add Khan v brook in a few years when they both retired
International
Kovalev v Stevenson
Hopkins v toney - maybe 93/94 between jones beating them
Re: Fights that didn't happen?
Richard Williams vs Steve Roberts
Re: Fights that didn't happen?
Calzaghe v Reid rematch should've probably happened. I get tired whenever I watch that fight.
Re: Fights that didn't happen?
I always wanted to see Robert Dickie v Floyd Havard.
and for a while Pat Barrett v Tony Ekubia.
and for a while Pat Barrett v Tony Ekubia.
Re: Fights that didn't happen?
Hatton-Gatti
Hatton-Cotto @140
Mayorga-Margarito @147
Mayweather-Williams
Lewis-Vitali 2
Pac-Marquez 5
Naz-Morales
Lewis-Ibeabuchi
Hatton-Cotto @140
Mayorga-Margarito @147
Mayweather-Williams
Lewis-Vitali 2
Pac-Marquez 5
Naz-Morales
Lewis-Ibeabuchi
Re: Fights that didn't happen?
Yes, Ricky had some asbsolute classics he could have been in. Gatti would have been one, wasn't he close to fighting Shamba Mitchell at one stage.
Hatton vs Cotto at 140 - never really close to happening, but both the same age and touted as the two best prospects at the same time. Such a shame that didn't happen.
Hatton vs Cotto at 140 - never really close to happening, but both the same age and touted as the two best prospects at the same time. Such a shame that didn't happen.
-
Spud
- Heavyweight

Re: Fights that didn't happen?
The one that really grips me was Fury v Haye.
To be involved in the team & to have a big fight snatched away because of genuine injuries is a ****.
To be involved in the team & to have a big fight snatched away because of genuine injuries is a ****.
Re: Fights that didn't happen?
I adore Gatti, but I honestly figure Hatton would've been too strong for him, but it still might've been competitive in say 2003 or 2004.stujones wrote: ↑16 Nov 2017, 12:42 Yes, Ricky had some asbsolute classics he could have been in. Gatti would have been one, wasn't he close to fighting Shamba Mitchell at one stage.
Hatton vs Cotto at 140 - never really close to happening, but both the same age and touted as the two best prospects at the same time. Such a shame that didn't happen.
Hatton vs Cotto would've been awesome. In almost 20 years I've NEVER seen Cotto in a bad fight, and it's damn hard to imagine a fight with Hatton as anything other than a barnburner!
Re: Fights that didn't happen?
I think Hatton would have battered gattigilgamesh wrote: ↑16 Nov 2017, 12:53I adore Gatti, but I honestly figure Hatton would've been too strong for him, but it still might've been competitive in say 2003 or 2004.stujones wrote: ↑16 Nov 2017, 12:42 Yes, Ricky had some asbsolute classics he could have been in. Gatti would have been one, wasn't he close to fighting Shamba Mitchell at one stage.
Hatton vs Cotto at 140 - never really close to happening, but both the same age and touted as the two best prospects at the same time. Such a shame that didn't happen.
Hatton vs Cotto would've been awesome. In almost 20 years I've NEVER seen Cotto in a bad fight, and it's damn hard to imagine a fight with Hatton as anything other than a barnburner!
Hatton vs cotto would have been quality and at 140 Hatton had a good chance. At 147 cotto gives Hatton a hard time
Re: Fights that didn't happen?
Yeah I definitely think Cotto vs Hatton is a better fight at 140.Ossyrules wrote: ↑16 Nov 2017, 13:03I think Hatton would have battered gattigilgamesh wrote: ↑16 Nov 2017, 12:53I adore Gatti, but I honestly figure Hatton would've been too strong for him, but it still might've been competitive in say 2003 or 2004.stujones wrote: ↑16 Nov 2017, 12:42 Yes, Ricky had some asbsolute classics he could have been in. Gatti would have been one, wasn't he close to fighting Shamba Mitchell at one stage.
Hatton vs Cotto at 140 - never really close to happening, but both the same age and touted as the two best prospects at the same time. Such a shame that didn't happen.
Hatton vs Cotto would've been awesome. In almost 20 years I've NEVER seen Cotto in a bad fight, and it's damn hard to imagine a fight with Hatton as anything other than a barnburner!
Hatton vs cotto would have been quality and at 140 Hatton had a good chance. At 147 cotto gives Hatton a hard time
Re: Fights that didn't happen?
Speaking of Hatton, you can't begrudge him leaving Witter behind to chase Floyd - but it really should have happened afterwards. Ricky did good business regardless but nobody is telling me Hatton Lazcano was a bigger deal than Hatton Witter for the WBC 140 title.
As much as Ricky didn't like him, and Witter's style was never that popular, I think if he was being really honest he'd admit Witter would have been a hard fight that, for his image at the time, he really couldn't afford to lose.
As much as Ricky didn't like him, and Witter's style was never that popular, I think if he was being really honest he'd admit Witter would have been a hard fight that, for his image at the time, he really couldn't afford to lose.
-
Dirk Kelly
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4971
- Joined: 06 Jul 2004, 20:13
Re: Fights that didn't happen?
Good shout. There was a few fighters at that weight that could have led to some decent scraps. Williams, Roberts, Tak, Hare and a think a couple more.
Always likes Roberts then he got pasted by that Russian I think and went off and bought a B&B in Scotland I think.
Re: Fights that didn't happen?
Ah, is that what he did. He just seemed to disappear suddenly, as far as I knew anyway. Good on him, I hope the B&B is going well. Roberts was a good fighter, one of (as you say) a few useful guys around at that timedave_smith wrote: ↑16 Nov 2017, 15:50Good shout. There was a few fighters at that weight that could have led to some decent scraps. Williams, Roberts, Tak, Hare and a think a couple more.
Always likes Roberts then he got pasted by that Russian I think and went off and bought a B&B in Scotland I think.