Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
Do you think we'll see them looking relatively the same physically ?
-
victor-romeo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1633
- Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29
Re: Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
No I saw A photo Rigondeaux hitting mitts profile shot , I think it was his left shoulder looked huge, Wonder what kind of diet he is on..
Re: Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
rigo looked a little bulkier than normal from the pad work i saw. standing next 2 each other loma several inches taller than rigo.
Re: Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
Who's the referee ?
-
victor-romeo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1633
- Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29
Re: Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
This is going to be a good fight, I have hunch Rigo first going to try and blast Lomachenko out of there early. I wonder if Loma cut healed from his last fight? Also I don't recall seeing Loma fight another south paw this is going to be interesting...
Re: Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
They'll let cuts go to a certain extent I would have thought.
Re: Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
It's a P4P Ranking fight.
-
victor-romeo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1633
- Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29
Re: Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
Loma Currently a 3 to 1 betting favorite...that means the free market definitely thinks Rigo has a shot..
Re: Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
Live out here.
Re: Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
Have a friend who's a photographer and he got a picture yesterday with Lomachenko, Rigodeaux and Crawford together. Rigondeaux looks quite a bit smaller and Lomachenko and Crawford looked closer to the same size.
Re: Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
Loma is only taller than Rigo, while Rigo has wider shoulders and reach. The two are nearly the same size.
Re: Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
am i seeing the right pic?loma and craw dont at all look closer in size.and craw has much longer reach than loma but loma doesnt have longer reach than rigo.
-
victor-romeo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1633
- Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29
Re: Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
-
victor-romeo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1633
- Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29
Re: Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
This fight is going to be a real nice chapter in Lomachenko's narrative win lose or draw ...will take Loma one step closer to PPV land..
Re: Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
I thought weight would be an issue, but people have been overstating Rigondeaux being small. A small fighter would look chubby if he moved up, i.e. Josesito Lopez vs. Canelo. Rigondeaux looked like a damn tank. He has a longer reach than Lomachenko too.
Re: Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
Lomachenko definitely bigger.
Can see the weight around Rigondeaux's stomach, he looks wider.
Can see the weight around Rigondeaux's stomach, he looks wider.
-
victor-romeo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1633
- Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29
Re: Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
Tank is the right word. Rigo looks like a little tank, I could see him KO'ing Loma, not probable , but could see it happening, Rigo is desperate as he is getting old and needs some big paydays, and motiviated because he thinks he has been dissed by boxing.. so this great fighter will be motivated and focused. His big problem is that Rigo doesn't have much of chin and Loma can find him, so most likely Loma will win.
Re: Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
Forget about the height and reach comparison, the biggest statistic to me is age. 37.....man, i never realized Rigo was THAT freaking old. And you know, he's most likely older than that because the Cuban's are notorious for mucking up ages of their athletes.
Nah, I don't see any way Loma loses this one now. I love all underdogs but this one might be quick and fizzle out.
Nah, I don't see any way Loma loses this one now. I love all underdogs but this one might be quick and fizzle out.
Re: Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
Even more than his age is the fact that he has only boxed 3 rounds in the last 3 years. I still hope he wins.caldo2025 wrote: ↑09 Dec 2017, 08:35 Forget about the height and reach comparison, the biggest statistic to me is age. 37.....man, i never realized Rigo was THAT freaking old. And you know, he's most likely older than that because the Cuban's are notorious for mucking up ages of their athletes.
Nah, I don't see any way Loma loses this one now. I love all underdogs but this one might be quick and fizzle out.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 101486
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
They just weighed in again..
Loma is 137.4 and Rigo is 130..
Loma is 137.4 and Rigo is 130..
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
A fair amount of weight in lower weight classes.
| think the thing which is most against Rigondeaux is his economical style, it's likely to cost him the fight if it is anywhere near close.
| think the thing which is most against Rigondeaux is his economical style, it's likely to cost him the fight if it is anywhere near close.
Re: Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
Really changes the vibe of a staredown to have the hot chicks inches away from the fighters.victor-romeo wrote: ↑08 Dec 2017, 20:30![]()
Re: Weigh In Friday ... Rigondeaux Lomachenko
There are rumours abound that Rigo is a year or two older than his listed age. A bit like Ortiz, can't be proven, but some things going back to both's amateur career don't add upcaldo2025 wrote: ↑09 Dec 2017, 08:35 Forget about the height and reach comparison, the biggest statistic to me is age. 37.....man, i never realized Rigo was THAT freaking old. And you know, he's most likely older than that because the Cuban's are notorious for mucking up ages of their athletes.
Nah, I don't see any way Loma loses this one now. I love all underdogs but this one might be quick and fizzle out.