Barthelemy vs. Relikh II - Vacant WBA title - February 10, 2018

Post Reply

Who wins?

Poll ended at 10 Feb 2018, 16:37

Barthelemy - Decision
1
25%
Barthelemy - KO/TKO
1
25%
DRAW
0
No votes
Relikh - KO/TKO
0
No votes
Relikh - Decision
2
50%
 
Total votes: 4

Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101493
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Barthelemy vs. Relikh II - Vacant WBA title - February 10, 2018

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

On Saturday, February 10 live on SHOWTIME, at the Alamodome in San Antonio, Texas, two-division world champion Rances Barthelemy will face Kiryl Relikh in a rematch of their May showdown on SHOWTIME, this time for the vacant WBA 140-pound world title.

The fight will be the co-feature to three-division world champion Mikey Garcia attempting to win a world title in a fourth weight class when he challenges unbeaten IBF 140-pound world champion Sergey Lipinets.

The doubleheader of title bouts in the wide-open 140-pound division sets the stage for a potential unification match.

Tickets for the event, which is promoted by Ringstar Sports and TGB Promotions, are priced at $250, $75, $50 and $20. Tickets will go on sale next week and will be available at Ticketmaster.com.
Andrew
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Barthelemy vs. Relikh II - Vacant WBA title - February 10, 2018

Post by Andrew »

Not sure. I expected Barthelemy to wipe the floor with Relikh first time around but it was close.

The winner of this and the main event better fight.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46442
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Barthelemy vs. Relikh II - Vacant WBA title - February 10, 2018

Post by gilgamesh »

Naandrew wrote: 15 Dec 2017, 15:02 Not sure. I expected Barthelemy to wipe the floor with Relikh first time around but it was close.

The winner of this and the main event better fight.
You'd want to see Mikey Garcia fight the winner of this one? I'd rather see Garcia fight a more meaningful opponent myself. Either of these guys would be easy for Garcia I figure.
Andrew
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Barthelemy vs. Relikh II - Vacant WBA title - February 10, 2018

Post by Andrew »

gilgamesh wrote: 15 Dec 2017, 15:12
Naandrew wrote: 15 Dec 2017, 15:02 Not sure. I expected Barthelemy to wipe the floor with Relikh first time around but it was close.

The winner of this and the main event better fight.
You'd want to see Mikey Garcia fight the winner of this one? I'd rather see Garcia fight a more meaningful opponent myself. Either of these guys would be easy for Garcia I figure.
If Mikey is at 140 what else is there for him ?

I've criticised the Lipinets fight in its own thread. I'd rather Mikey clear up a weight class, if that's 140 so be it.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46442
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Barthelemy vs. Relikh II - Vacant WBA title - February 10, 2018

Post by gilgamesh »

Naandrew wrote: 15 Dec 2017, 15:14
gilgamesh wrote: 15 Dec 2017, 15:12
Naandrew wrote: 15 Dec 2017, 15:02 Not sure. I expected Barthelemy to wipe the floor with Relikh first time around but it was close.

The winner of this and the main event better fight.
You'd want to see Mikey Garcia fight the winner of this one? I'd rather see Garcia fight a more meaningful opponent myself. Either of these guys would be easy for Garcia I figure.
If Mikey is at 140 what else is there for him ?

I've criticised the Lipinets fight in its own thread. I'd rather Mikey clear up a weight class, if that's 140 so be it.

There was Linares at 135 that he bypassed which is better than anybody he could possibly fight at 140. At 140 there's absolutely nobody of note for Garcia to fight. Mikey Garcia is the only fighter with any name value at 140.
Mexi-Box
Welterweight
Posts: 3963
Joined: 24 Jan 2016, 16:19

Re: Barthelemy vs. Relikh II - Vacant WBA title - February 10, 2018

Post by Mexi-Box »

gilgamesh wrote: 15 Dec 2017, 15:15
Naandrew wrote: 15 Dec 2017, 15:14
gilgamesh wrote: 15 Dec 2017, 15:12

You'd want to see Mikey Garcia fight the winner of this one? I'd rather see Garcia fight a more meaningful opponent myself. Either of these guys would be easy for Garcia I figure.
If Mikey is at 140 what else is there for him ?

I've criticised the Lipinets fight in its own thread. I'd rather Mikey clear up a weight class, if that's 140 so be it.

There was Linares at 135 that he bypassed which is better than anybody he could possibly fight at 140. At 140 there's absolutely nobody of note for Garcia to fight. Mikey Garcia is the only fighter with any name value at 140.
Please, Linares is nowhere near a threat to Mikey. Barthelemy was #1 at 135 lbs. while Linares was there. If anything, Barthelemy/Relikh winner would be a better name than Linares. As for this fight, I thought Relikh won it clear. I think he'll win again but get robbed. Barthelemy is a lucky fighter. Should have two losses on his resume.
TheGingerBomber
Lightweight
Posts: 1233
Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18

Re: Barthelemy vs. Relikh II - Vacant WBA title - February 10, 2018

Post by TheGingerBomber »

Looks like the GOAT Josh Taylor will have to pummel Mikey n' co. into submission.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46442
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Barthelemy vs. Relikh II - Vacant WBA title - February 10, 2018

Post by gilgamesh »

Mexi-Box wrote: 16 Dec 2017, 04:06
gilgamesh wrote: 15 Dec 2017, 15:15
Naandrew wrote: 15 Dec 2017, 15:14

If Mikey is at 140 what else is there for him ?

I've criticised the Lipinets fight in its own thread. I'd rather Mikey clear up a weight class, if that's 140 so be it.

There was Linares at 135 that he bypassed which is better than anybody he could possibly fight at 140. At 140 there's absolutely nobody of note for Garcia to fight. Mikey Garcia is the only fighter with any name value at 140.
Please, Linares is nowhere near a threat to Mikey. Barthelemy was #1 at 135 lbs. while Linares was there. If anything, Barthelemy/Relikh winner would be a better name than Linares. As for this fight, I thought Relikh won it clear. I think he'll win again but get robbed. Barthelemy is a lucky fighter. Should have two losses on his resume.
Linares is significantly more accomplished than Barthelemy and Relikh combined.
Mexi-Box
Welterweight
Posts: 3963
Joined: 24 Jan 2016, 16:19

Re: Barthelemy vs. Relikh II - Vacant WBA title - February 10, 2018

Post by Mexi-Box »

gilgamesh wrote: 16 Dec 2017, 10:02
Mexi-Box wrote: 16 Dec 2017, 04:06
gilgamesh wrote: 15 Dec 2017, 15:15


There was Linares at 135 that he bypassed which is better than anybody he could possibly fight at 140. At 140 there's absolutely nobody of note for Garcia to fight. Mikey Garcia is the only fighter with any name value at 140.
Please, Linares is nowhere near a threat to Mikey. Barthelemy was #1 at 135 lbs. while Linares was there. If anything, Barthelemy/Relikh winner would be a better name than Linares. As for this fight, I thought Relikh won it clear. I think he'll win again but get robbed. Barthelemy is a lucky fighter. Should have two losses on his resume.
Linares is significantly more accomplished than Barthelemy and Relikh combined.
How? Did you forget Linares got stopped by average guys like Demarco and Thompson? Mikey knocks him out in any scenario.

Barthelemy beat Mendez x2, Shafikov, Bey, and Demarco, and as I said, he was the #1 LW while Linares was still fighting there.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46442
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Barthelemy vs. Relikh II - Vacant WBA title - February 10, 2018

Post by gilgamesh »

Mexi-Box wrote: 16 Dec 2017, 14:46
gilgamesh wrote: 16 Dec 2017, 10:02
Mexi-Box wrote: 16 Dec 2017, 04:06

Please, Linares is nowhere near a threat to Mikey. Barthelemy was #1 at 135 lbs. while Linares was there. If anything, Barthelemy/Relikh winner would be a better name than Linares. As for this fight, I thought Relikh won it clear. I think he'll win again but get robbed. Barthelemy is a lucky fighter. Should have two losses on his resume.
Linares is significantly more accomplished than Barthelemy and Relikh combined.
How? Did you forget Linares got stopped by average guys like Demarco and Thompson? Mikey knocks him out in any scenario.

Barthelemy beat Mendez x2, Shafikov, Bey, and Demarco, and as I said, he was the #1 LW while Linares was still fighting there.
Barthelemy has never been #1 in any weight class he's competed in.

I remember Linares' losses. He's improved since those defeats, and is better now than he's ever been. He's held titles in 3 weight classes, and has been in significantly more title fights than Relikh or Barthelemy. The cuts defeat to Sergio Thompson seems to be a case where he just didn't give himself time to heal up properly following the Demarco fight which was quite grueling.

I think Linares would definitely beat Barthelemy or Relikh. I'll give it to you though that Garcia probably would be too much for Linares. I'd still like to see it though because I don't like to just assume a guy can beat somebody.
Mexi-Box
Welterweight
Posts: 3963
Joined: 24 Jan 2016, 16:19

Re: Barthelemy vs. Relikh II - Vacant WBA title - February 10, 2018

Post by Mexi-Box »

gilgamesh wrote: 16 Dec 2017, 15:02
Mexi-Box wrote: 16 Dec 2017, 14:46
gilgamesh wrote: 16 Dec 2017, 10:02

Linares is significantly more accomplished than Barthelemy and Relikh combined.
How? Did you forget Linares got stopped by average guys like Demarco and Thompson? Mikey knocks him out in any scenario.

Barthelemy beat Mendez x2, Shafikov, Bey, and Demarco, and as I said, he was the #1 LW while Linares was still fighting there.
Barthelemy has never been #1 in any weight class he's competed in.

I remember Linares' losses. He's improved since those defeats, and is better now than he's ever been. He's held titles in 3 weight classes, and has been in significantly more title fights than Relikh or Barthelemy. The cuts defeat to Sergio Thompson seems to be a case where he just didn't give himself time to heal up properly following the Demarco fight which was quite grueling.

I think Linares would definitely beat Barthelemy or Relikh. I'll give it to you though that Garcia probably would be too much for Linares. I'd still like to see it though because I don't like to just assume a guy can beat somebody.
I think it was after Crawford vacated and Barthelemy defeated Shafikov or Bey that he was ranked there.

How do you know Linares has improved? His resume isn't that good. What's his best win since his return? Anthony Crolla who is domestic level or Mitchell? Both are lesser names than Shafikov and Mendez.

No, Linares would get knocked out by Barthelemy. Relikh outworks him as the bigger, stronger guy.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46442
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Barthelemy vs. Relikh II - Vacant WBA title - February 10, 2018

Post by gilgamesh »

I know Linares has improved because I can see it when I watch him fight.

Since they're fighting in different weight classes at the moment anyway, whether or not he'd beat Barthelemy or Relikh is apparently a moot point.

I'd favor Mikey G. to beat the winner of Barthelemy-Relikh that's for sure.
Post Reply