Yes I did and I agree it can be difficult to knock out a fighter intent on surviva,l but I don't think Hammer would have stuck around long against Joshua or Povetkin at the top of his game, however negative he was. He didn't appear too difficult to hit to me, in fact Povetkin landed punches just not in combinations and not hard enough to get the job done. Then there's Rudenko who's a tough man to be sure, but I was expecting Povetkin to become the first man to stop him.Heretic wrote: ↑19 Dec 2017, 10:05Did you watch the Hammer fight? I would not make any assumptions about fighters punching power against a guy that is only there to survive. Hammer was throwing something like ten punches per round, had his high guard constantly up and was clinching the whole fight. Octopuses are hard to KO![]()
I'm a fan of Povetkin (as I am any heavyweight who can beat, or has a realistic chance of upsetting a world championship belt-holder) but watching Povetkin against Rudenko and against Hammer after his awesome destruction of Duhaupas ... well it was like Bruce Banner compared with the Incredible Hulk.
Perhaps it's age related but he seemed to box well enough and it's an old cliche that the last thing you lose is your punch. I try to keep an open mind but I reserve the right to speculate.