Saad come back

[Jip]

[armageto]

Where did he go, to come back from?

[candyslim]

He would Jip, if he could. See my thread "Victimization on BoxRec"

[keithmoonhangover]

He would Jip, if he could. See my thread "Victimization on BoxRec"

[RScarf1]

Who is deleting Saad's comments? A moderator or a user?

[jamamb]

top poster saad is

[Jip]

He would Jip, if he could. See my thread "Victimization on BoxRec"

[Enlightened-One]

Saad come back

His most recent post was only submitted yesterday! Not even 24 hours ago!

Sad fûckęrs... or should that be "Saad" fûckęrs!

He would Jip, if he could. See my thread "Victimization on BoxRec"

Do you actually know what the word "victimisation" means?

"The action of singling someone out for cruel or unjust treatment."

And exactly how does this apply to Saad? Is he being treated in a cruel or unjust manner that is deemed unlawful?

You've clearly embellished the situation to extreme levels.

Your comments in that thread made my bum cheeks clench through feeling sheer empathic embarrassment for you.

[Ricky_]

Saad come back

His most recent post was only submitted yesterday! Not even 24 hours ago!

Sad fûckęrs... or should that be "Saad" fûckęrs!

He would Jip, if he could. See my thread "Victimization on BoxRec"

Do you actually know what the word "victimisation" means?

"The action of singling someone out for cruel or unjust treatment."

And exactly how does this apply to Saad? Is he being treated in a cruel or unjust manner that is deemed unlawful?

You've clearly embellished the situation to extreme levels.

Your comments in that thread made my bum cheeks clench through feeling sheer empathic embarrassment for you.

Remember you got banned for being a troll, Fergus, then you signed back up as Enlightened One?

Let's have a poll and see who would prefer you to get banned again in return for bringing back Saad. I bet you don't do very well.

[Enlightened-One]

Saad come back

His most recent post was only submitted yesterday! Not even 24 hours ago!

Sad fûckęrs... or should that be "Saad" fûckęrs!

He would Jip, if he could. See my thread "Victimization on BoxRec"

Do you actually know what the word "victimisation" means?

"The action of singling someone out for cruel or unjust treatment."

And exactly how does this apply to Saad? Is he being treated in a cruel or unjust manner that is deemed unlawful?

You've clearly embellished the situation to extreme levels.

Your comments in that thread made my bum cheeks clench through feeling sheer empathic embarrassment for you.

Remember you got banned for being a troll, Fergus, then you signed back up as Enlightened One?

Let's have a poll and see who would prefer you to get banned again in return for bringing back Saad. I bet you don't do very well.

You're confusing me with someone else. I have never received a permanent ban.

Refraining from persistently adhering to the Lemming-like opinions of the mainstream masses, whilst being capable of justifying one's opinions by citing evidence, does not warrant any accusations of me being a troll.

I silence you regularly, due to researching my claims, but this clearly upsets you.

Anybody that disagrees with you is simply a "troll" in your eyes, especially if they prove you wrong.

[Ricky_]

His most recent post was only submitted yesterday! Not even 24 hours ago!

Sad fûckęrs... or should that be "Saad" fûckęrs!


Do you actually know what the word "victimisation" means?

"The action of singling someone out for cruel or unjust treatment."

And exactly how does this apply to Saad? Is he being treated in a cruel or unjust manner that is deemed unlawful?

You've clearly embellished the situation to extreme levels.

Your comments in that thread made my bum cheeks clench through feeling sheer empathic embarrassment for you.

Remember you got banned for being a troll, Fergus, then you signed back up as Enlightened One?

Let's have a poll and see who would prefer you to get banned again in return for bringing back Saad. I bet you don't do very well.

You're confusing me with someone else. I have never received a permanent ban.

Refraining from persistently adhering to the Lemming-like opinions of the mainstream masses, whilst being capable of justifying one's opinions by citing evidence, does not warrant any accusations of me being a troll.

I silence you regularly, due to researching my claims, but this clearly upsets you.

Fergus = enlightened one
Enlightened one = fergus
Fergus = troll
Troll = enlightened one

OhYes.

[candyslim]

No need to get embarrassed for me EO. I think you have a distorted idea about the word. Nobody is suggesting the holocaust here, there can be very low level victimization. All it means is someone has been singled out for undeserved poor treatment, which having exchanged posts with Saad yesterday, I believed it to be the arbitrary action of a single mod acting on his own prejudices, and simply removing the posts of a poster he didn't like.

Now I know a little more about it i see the situation is a little more complex than it appeared.

[caldo2025]

I've been on this site for years and I still don't know what anyone means about MOD'S and Bans or deleted posts...I've never heard from any message board police or stuff like that. No idea what this is all about honestly. I wouldn't mind someone finally explaining it to me but I won't hold my nuts waiting.

[paddy chavez]

Unintended post

[paddy chavez]

I've been on this site for years and I still don't know what anyone means about MOD'S and Bans or deleted posts...I've never heard from any message board police or stuff like that. No idea what this is all about honestly. I wouldn't mind someone finally explaining it to me but I won't hold my nuts waiting.

I would make a guess that if you've been here for years yet you're a flyweight you know more about being banned than you're letting on .

[Jip]

Mimmy banned Saad for using emoticons.

Mimmy why did you banned saad!?

Where is gilgamech. He is a mod. Gilga bring saad back. He loves boxing and he needs that forum.

[Enlightened-One]

No need to get embarrassed for me EO. I think you have a distorted idea about the word. Nobody is suggesting the holocaust here, there can be very low level victimization. All it means is someone has been singled out for undeserved poor treatment, which having exchanged posts with Saad yesterday, I believed it to be the arbitrary action of a single mod acting on his own prejudices, and simply removing the posts of a poster he didn't like.

Now I know a little more about it i see the situation is a little more complex than it appeared.

Do you know the precise reason for Saad's alleged "poor treatment"?

Are you in possession of all the facts that have compelled you to draw such a conclusion, such as witnessing first-hand any comments that he may have made that were subsequently deleted?

Share this information with us and we can decide for ourselves if Saad has been treated inappropriately.

If not, then why prematurely jump to conclusions?

[gilgamesh]

Mimmy banned Saad for using emoticons.

Mimmy why did you banned saad!?

Where is gilgamech. He is a mod. Gilga bring saad back. He loves boxing and he needs that forum.

It's not up to me Jip. I'm friends with Saad, and if it were solely up to me I'd bring him back in a heartbeat, but John the owner of the site, agrees with Mimmy's decision so I'd say my hands are tied on this matter.


These things have a tendency to work themselves out over time.

Believe it or not. I was banned once

[Badhusker]

His most recent post was only submitted yesterday! Not even 24 hours ago!

Sad fûckęrs... or should that be "Saad" fûckęrs!


Do you actually know what the word "victimisation" means?

"The action of singling someone out for cruel or unjust treatment."

And exactly how does this apply to Saad? Is he being treated in a cruel or unjust manner that is deemed unlawful?

You've clearly embellished the situation to extreme levels.

Your comments in that thread made my bum cheeks clench through feeling sheer empathic embarrassment for you.

Remember you got banned for being a troll, Fergus, then you signed back up as Enlightened One?

Let's have a poll and see who would prefer you to get banned again in return for bringing back Saad. I bet you don't do very well.

You're confusing me with someone else. I have never received a permanent ban.

Refraining from persistently adhering to the Lemming-like opinions of the mainstream masses, whilst being capable of justifying one's opinions by citing evidence, does not warrant any accusations of me being a troll.

I silence you regularly, due to researching my claims, but this clearly upsets you.

Anybody that disagrees with you is simply a "troll" in your eyes, especially if they prove you wrong.

If we were to all post our current and previous screen names, and get a permanent ban if not honest, it would get rid of about half a dozen I am guessing.

[candyslim]

You're right EO I had only heard one side of the story (I wasn't sure I'd hear the other side) and went off half-cock. I guess I don't have your phlegmatic nature, and despite the crap he gives me, I like Saad.

I apologize if I have been unfair to Mimmy or any other mod.

[BAD INTENTIONS]

I’m not for any banning.

Saad is an idiot who doesn’t debate.
He just criticizes anyone who doesn’t believe the media is 95% accurate.
And if u never seen one of his drunk rants, don’t talk.

It’s easy to vilify me or EO, but that’s because many people here read at like a 5th grade level.
I think this forum should be about discussing your views on boxing and boxing related manners.
If I don’t agree with you fine, make your points, I’ll make mine, we’ll talk shit like “men”.
Just don’t criticize without making a valid point.

[boxing_rocks]

Saad can be an arrogant a$$ at times, but he is a part of boxrec legacy and whoever banned him is a moron.

[Enlightened-One]

You're right EO I had only heard one side of the story (I wasn't sure I'd hear the other side) and went off half-cock. I guess I don't have your phlegmatic nature, and despite the crap he gives me, I like Saad.

I apologize if I have been unfair to Mimmy or any other mod.

You don't have to apologise to me or anyone else, every one is wrong at times, including myself... and like you, I've admitted it.

I respect your honesty and you've risen in my estimation.

[boxing_rocks]

No need to get embarrassed for me EO. I think you have a distorted idea about the word. Nobody is suggesting the holocaust here, there can be very low level victimization. All it means is someone has been singled out for undeserved poor treatment, which having exchanged posts with Saad yesterday, I believed it to be the arbitrary action of a single mod acting on his own prejudices, and simply removing the posts of a poster he didn't like.

Now I know a little more about it i see the situation is a little more complex than it appeared.

Do you know the precise reason for Saad's alleged "poor treatment"?

Are you in possession of all the facts that have compelled you to draw such a conclusion, such as witnessing first-hand any comments that he may have made that were subsequently deleted?

Share this information with us and we can decide for ourselves if Saad has been treated inappropriately.

If not, then why prematurely jump to conclusions?

Did he call you what you deserve to be called?

Tell us your side of the story.

[Enlightened-One]