Exactly. The guy ruins threads.Ricky_ wrote: ↑23 Dec 2017, 18:23mimmy123 wrote: ↑23 Dec 2017, 17:52I can assure you the ban was proportionate with the events of yesterday.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑23 Dec 2017, 17:43
You can't accuse the moderators of behaving inappropriately if you're not in possession of any of the facts relating to Saad's ban.
It's as simple as that!
Don't act like a fûckîng twät by arguing against a stance that you clearly don't understand!![]()
I know on occasions things happen that can seem to be harsh or over zealous. I had to deal with the situation at hand along with another mod for over 4 hours until we finally concluded the whole issue.
I'm sorry if you do not agree but speculating events or happenings that did not happen is not helpful and just causes further tension.
Believe me we do not ban long term posters on a whim or anyone for that matter unless we have justifiable reasons.
I feel bad about this whole situation but enough was enough.
Merry Christmas.
Mimmy.
Why don't you ban enlightened one? His old account fergus got banned for trolling & now he's even worse.
Saad was the best boxing poster on the board. Enlightened One is the worst.
Victimization on BoxRec
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
You're confusing me with someone else. I have never received a permanent ban.
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
Enlightened-One wrote: ↑23 Dec 2017, 19:41 You're confusing me with someone else. I have never received a permanent ban.
If i were you fergus i would also be too embarrassed to admit i was Fergus.
You & Brut are too stupid to realise how distinctive your trolling is.
-
funso banjo baby
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4417
- Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
90% of all comments should be deleted
-
SenorPipino
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 6055
- Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
Comments, asinine or not, should never be stifled, unless they're mind-bogglingly offensive.
The concept of free speech must be adhered.
Where would Billy Joe Saunders be if he was banned for unthinking, distasteful remarks?
The concept of free speech must be adhered.
Where would Billy Joe Saunders be if he was banned for unthinking, distasteful remarks?
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
SenorPipino wrote: ↑24 Dec 2017, 11:40 Comments, asinine or not, should never be stifled, unless they're mind-bogglingly offensive.
The concept of free speech must be adhered.
This. Saad got himself banned on purpose for this reason. His posts were getting deleted for no other reason some mods didn't like them. It's a shame that a quality poster is gone because of it - i liked reading Saad's opinion on the fight game, he knows the sport better than most.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
Can anybody say what exactly a cause of Saad's ban was?
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
He was a deck. Just kidding. Maybe because he repeatedly used this emoticon
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
Mimmy is artogant. Said 0 about the reasons why she deleted saad. Because a there is no valid reason and b she doesnt care.
But i care. This boxrec community is important to me. Although most know sh:&;#t about boxing. But there are things far worse than having lopsided knowledge about boxing.
But i care. This boxrec community is important to me. Although most know sh:&;#t about boxing. But there are things far worse than having lopsided knowledge about boxing.
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
What happened to your Thread Of The Year, Jip?Jip wrote: ↑25 Dec 2017, 09:12 Mimmy is artogant. Said 0 about the reasons why she deleted saad. Because a there is no valid reason and b she doesnt care.
But i care. This boxrec community is important to me. Although most know sh:&;#t about boxing. But there are things far worse than having lopsided knowledge about boxing.
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
Mimmy/byrd was the name of the thread.Tanzio wrote: ↑25 Dec 2017, 10:01What happened to your Thread Of The Year, Jip?Jip wrote: ↑25 Dec 2017, 09:12 Mimmy is artogant. Said 0 about the reasons why she deleted saad. Because a there is no valid reason and b she doesnt care.
But i care. This boxrec community is important to me. Although most know sh:&;#t about boxing. But there are things far worse than having lopsided knowledge about boxing.What was the name of that masterpiece again?
A guy called jaudg or something similar posted on my thread. He is a mod or editor, one of the bosses of boxrec. He wrote to mimmy asking mimmy to put the thread in the off topic, out of current sceane since the my thread had nothing to do with Boxing.
He went on to complain that the thread started with saad and ended with members wanting foot pics of mimmy, cause mimmy posted a foto of herself and some found her attractive and wanted more.
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
Absolutely disgraceful that a work of art like that has been obliteratedJip wrote: ↑25 Dec 2017, 10:07Mimmy/byrd was the name of the thread.Tanzio wrote: ↑25 Dec 2017, 10:01What happened to your Thread Of The Year, Jip?Jip wrote: ↑25 Dec 2017, 09:12 Mimmy is artogant. Said 0 about the reasons why she deleted saad. Because a there is no valid reason and b she doesnt care.
But i care. This boxrec community is important to me. Although most know sh:&;#t about boxing. But there are things far worse than having lopsided knowledge about boxing.What was the name of that masterpiece again?
A guy called jaudg or something similar posted on my thread. He is a mod or editor, one of the bosses of boxrec. He wrote to mimmy asking mimmy to put the thread in the off topic, out of current sceane since the my thread had nothing to do with Boxing.
He went on to complain that the thread started with saad and ended with members wanting foot pics of mimmy, cause mimmy posted a foto of herself and some found her attractive and wanted more.![]()
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
SenorPipino wrote: ↑24 Dec 2017, 11:40 Comments, asinine or not, should never be stifled, unless they're mind-bogglingly offensive.
The concept of free speech must be adhered.
Where would Billy Joe Saunders be if he was banned for unthinking, distasteful remarks?
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
Weird. Your entitled to your opinions of course.boxing_rocks wrote: ↑23 Dec 2017, 18:40Exactly. The guy ruins threads.Ricky_ wrote: ↑23 Dec 2017, 18:23mimmy123 wrote: ↑23 Dec 2017, 17:52
I can assure you the ban was proportionate with the events of yesterday.
I know on occasions things happen that can seem to be harsh or over zealous. I had to deal with the situation at hand along with another mod for over 4 hours until we finally concluded the whole issue.
I'm sorry if you do not agree but speculating events or happenings that did not happen is not helpful and just causes further tension.
Believe me we do not ban long term posters on a whim or anyone for that matter unless we have justifiable reasons.
I feel bad about this whole situation but enough was enough.
Merry Christmas.
Mimmy.
Why don't you ban enlightened one? His old account fergus got banned for trolling & now he's even worse.
Saad was the best boxing poster on the board. Enlightened One is the worst.