cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by jamamb »

MarkMcBurney wrote: 09 Dec 2017, 19:42
MarkMcBurney wrote: 08 Dec 2017, 04:09 Degale is over rated for me. Lost to Medina and Jack IMO, and would lose comfortably against Groves again.
:wave:
think youll get more agreement after tonight :lol:
BrumBlue
Welterweight
Posts: 37
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 07:22

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by BrumBlue »

I thought the scorecards for Ward Kov I were correct

I had Frampton v Santa Cruz I as a draw.

I had Chisora beating Whyte fairly comfortably.
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5737
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by Cyclops »

Jacobs beat GGG.

Froch vs GGG would have been in the top ten best fights ever and Froch would have won.

Maidana won the first Mayweather fight.

Wladamir did not let Joshua “off the hook” he boxed sensibly against a very dangerous opponent who was blowing out of his arse and ready to go. We all thought he’d won. If he’d gone for the kill and got caught people would have had a go at him for steaming in like an idiot.

Chisora best Whyte.

Deontay Wilder is fornicating shite.

Jack beat Degale.

Pacquiao won the 3rd Marquez fight.

Joe Joyce is really good and is going to do stop every poor bastard he fights in one sided beat downs until he gets a title shot.

Kovalev vs Hopkins wasn’t a masterclass. Hopkins went down, shit a brick and ran for his life knowing that if he engaged he was going to sleep.

Canelo and Ward are a couple of pricks.

Froch Dirrell was not a robbery

Steve Cunningham is criminally underrated.

I’m sure there are plenty more.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by jamamb »

im very confident froch wouldve taken ggg. he wouldve smiled at his shots and beaten up a guy whose even easier to hit. too big too strong. :TU:
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by jamamb »

another one brought to mind from the 'bad persons' thread in the other section:

im glad evil gerald mclellan got bashed in. karma for being an awful, evil , sadistic person who enjoyed torturing and killing animals that he made defenseless. geralds defenseless now too but at least he was allowed to defend himself vs benn.
keirw
Middleweight
Posts: 2681
Joined: 03 Nov 2013, 10:55

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by keirw »

clopixolacuphase wrote: 11 Dec 2017, 20:52 Jacobs beat GGG.

Froch vs GGG would have been in the top ten best fights ever and Froch would have won.

Maidana won the first Mayweather fight.

Wladamir did not let Joshua “off the hook” he boxed sensibly against a very dangerous opponent who was blowing out of his arse and ready to go. We all thought he’d won. If he’d gone for the kill and got caught people would have had a go at him for steaming in like an idiot.

Chisora best Whyte.

Deontay Wilder is effing shite.

Jack beat Degale.

Pacquiao won the 3rd Marquez fight.

Joe Joyce is really good and is going to do stop every poor bastard he fights in one sided beat downs until he gets a title shot.

Kovalev vs Hopkins wasn’t a masterclass. Hopkins went down, poo a brick and ran for his life knowing that if he engaged he was going to sleep.

Canelo and Ward are a couple of pricks.

Froch Dirrell was not a robbery

Steve Cunningham is criminally underrated.

I’m sure there are plenty more.
Agree with all those in bold.
In fact, I think Jack vs Groves was a closer fight than Jack vs Degale and if either deserved to get a draw it should have been Groves
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by jamamb »

jack vs groves was really close. ppl forget just how many rounds jack really didnt do much while groves kept at it. yes jacks effective but he can really do too little sometimes. very one paced. i think after yrs of being underrated hes actually gotten just a tad ovverated tbh. hes barely better than groves, which is still quite good. quite possibly top 3 at 175 (imo lots of overrated eastern euros, though actually not kov).
Last edited by jamamb on 09 Jan 2018, 07:19, edited 2 times in total.
paddy chavez
Lightweight
Posts: 2678
Joined: 13 Jun 2017, 08:08

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by paddy chavez »

I don't think Pernell Whitaker that great or as hard to hit as some make out.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by jamamb »

i had frampton vs quigg a draw now that i remember. gave quigg 1 round in first half then 5 of the last 6
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6629
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by THEBUTCH »

I had Groves beating Jack in a close one, but thought Jack beat DeGale well enough.

I agreed with Horn beating Pac Man in a close one.
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by TheGman »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 07 Dec 2017, 05:15
Naandrew wrote: 07 Dec 2017, 04:39 Shawn porter beat Kell Brook. I don't think Brook did enough
You're not alone.
You are deffo not alone
MarkMcBurney
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1670
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by MarkMcBurney »

THEBUTCH wrote: 09 Jan 2018, 09:51 I had Groves beating Jack in a close one, but thought Jack beat DeGale well enough.

I agreed with Horn beating Pac Man in a close one.
:TU:
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by Tomasino »

vidal wrote: 07 Dec 2017, 05:28 In terms of boxing, I was convinced Groves would handsomely beat Froch in the rematch.

I thought David Price was a champion in waiting.

Actually there are loads of boxing ones.......

My political views are contrary to most of my friends and colleagues, as I'm a socialist and Corbyn supporter (not as unpopular as it once was).

The biggest one is probably that I firmly believe that we exist within a computer simulation............. :geek:

what makes you so firm on that belief?
vidal
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by vidal »

Tomasino wrote: 09 Jan 2018, 12:40
vidal wrote: 07 Dec 2017, 05:28 In terms of boxing, I was convinced Groves would handsomely beat Froch in the rematch.

I thought David Price was a champion in waiting.

Actually there are loads of boxing ones.......

My political views are contrary to most of my friends and colleagues, as I'm a socialist and Corbyn supporter (not as unpopular as it once was).

The biggest one is probably that I firmly believe that we exist within a computer simulation............. :geek:

what makes you so firm on that belief?
A few things really, primarily the reality of the technology and the future usefulness of simulation as a tool.

As we stand, we're not too many years off being able to create such technology where we could create a simulated world with free thinking characters. The use would be immense as it would allow us to model and predict scenarios from economic to military applications.

What's to say we're not living in such a simulation?

The more I read about quantum physics, the more convinced I am:


The big bang theory leaves so many unanswered questions.
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by Tomasino »

vidal wrote: 09 Jan 2018, 15:48
Tomasino wrote: 09 Jan 2018, 12:40
vidal wrote: 07 Dec 2017, 05:28 In terms of boxing, I was convinced Groves would handsomely beat Froch in the rematch.

I thought David Price was a champion in waiting.

Actually there are loads of boxing ones.......

My political views are contrary to most of my friends and colleagues, as I'm a socialist and Corbyn supporter (not as unpopular as it once was).

The biggest one is probably that I firmly believe that we exist within a computer simulation............. :geek:

what makes you so firm on that belief?
A few things really, primarily the reality of the technology and the future usefulness of simulation as a tool.

As we stand, we're not too many years off being able to create such technology where we could create a simulated world with free thinking characters. The use would be immense as it would allow us to model and predict scenarios from economic to military applications.

What's to say we're not living in such a simulation?

The more I read about quantum physics, the more convinced I am:


The big bang theory leaves so many unanswered questions.

I do agree that’s it is coming soon technology and it will be immensely useful. It was a big part of a series of books I enjoyed, Altered Carbon being the first one.

Now, if we invent the technology and use it for ourselves that’s one thing but who has made the simulation that is our current reality?
vidal
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by vidal »

Tomasino wrote: 09 Jan 2018, 15:53
vidal wrote: 09 Jan 2018, 15:48
Tomasino wrote: 09 Jan 2018, 12:40


what makes you so firm on that belief?
A few things really, primarily the reality of the technology and the future usefulness of simulation as a tool.

As we stand, we're not too many years off being able to create such technology where we could create a simulated world with free thinking characters. The use would be immense as it would allow us to model and predict scenarios from economic to military applications.

What's to say we're not living in such a simulation?

The more I read about quantum physics, the more convinced I am:


The big bang theory leaves so many unanswered questions.

I do agree that’s it is coming soon technology and it will be immensely useful. It was a big part of a series of books I enjoyed, Altered Carbon being the first one.

Now, if we invent the technology and use it for ourselves that’s one thing but who has made the simulation that is our current reality?
I WAS hoping that it's someone who's taking his experiment seriously and wouldn't put a f*cking clown in charge of the free world for a laugh....... but now I think we're some 10 year old's science experiment....... :OhYes:
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by TheGman »

Tanzio wrote: 07 Dec 2017, 20:42 SOGgy v Krushedner I = 114-113 SOGgy

Pac v Bradley I = 115-113 Bradley
Dont agree with these at all,i fell asleep about round 9 of the pac brad fight and the only round bradly hgot max pounts was round 1 and that was 10-10. Soggy didnt do enough to win that first fight i had krusher winning by 3 rounds
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by TheGman »

Robin reid beat calzaghe
Bhop beat calzaghe
Holyfield beat lewis in the rematch
Never rated fury as a fighter,great talker but just cant take to him
ODLH beat floyd
ODLH beat trinidad
ODLH beat mosley in the rematch
Sturm beat ODLH
Bhop vs ODLH was a fix
Collazo beat hatton
Chocolatito got robbed in his first defeat
Canelo got beat by lara
Mike tyson was top in probably the worst era of heavyweight boxing
I thought cotto vs mayweather was a lot closer than the judges had it,like a round or two close
GGG got beat by jacobs
I had maidana beating floyd in the first fight.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32660
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by Boxerbeetle »

thechump wrote: 09 Jan 2018, 17:01 Robin reid beat calzaghe
Out of interest, have you rewatched that fight? I remember thinking watching it live that it was a very close fight which could have gone either way, but I watched it back and scored it properly for the first time a few years ago when we were doing the 52 week challenge thing on here, and I scored it fairly comfortably for Calzaghe. Reid definitely had his moments in the mid-rounds, but Calzaghe definitely won the fight imo.
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by TheGman »

Boxerbeetle wrote: 09 Jan 2018, 18:17
thechump wrote: 09 Jan 2018, 17:01 Robin reid beat calzaghe
Out of interest, have you rewatched that fight? I remember thinking watching it live that it was a very close fight which could have gone either way, but I watched it back and scored it properly for the first time a few years ago when we were doing the 52 week challenge thing on here, and I scored it fairly comfortably for Calzaghe. Reid definitely had his moments in the mid-rounds, but Calzaghe definitely won the fight imo.
If im completely honest i have never watched it back and could of been swayed cause reid was from merseyside and i followed him through the barcelona olympics. I was never a fan of calzaghe till he schooled lacey so add them two together and probably thats were i get the reid beat calzaghe from,if i get a spare hour one day i will dwfo rewatch it and try and score it fairly
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32660
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by Boxerbeetle »

thechump wrote: 09 Jan 2018, 20:47
Boxerbeetle wrote: 09 Jan 2018, 18:17
thechump wrote: 09 Jan 2018, 17:01 Robin reid beat calzaghe
Out of interest, have you rewatched that fight? I remember thinking watching it live that it was a very close fight which could have gone either way, but I watched it back and scored it properly for the first time a few years ago when we were doing the 52 week challenge thing on here, and I scored it fairly comfortably for Calzaghe. Reid definitely had his moments in the mid-rounds, but Calzaghe definitely won the fight imo.
If im completely honest i have never watched it back and could of been swayed cause reid was from merseyside and i followed him through the barcelona olympics. I was never a fan of calzaghe till he schooled lacey so add them two together and probably thats were i get the reid beat calzaghe from,if i get a spare hour one day i will dwfo rewatch it and try and score it fairly
It’s worth a rewatch, pretty good fight to be fair.
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by Tomasino »

smiling assassin wrote: 08 Dec 2017, 14:52 Most people disagree with me but I still think Jimmy Saville was a good man :TU:
Think you’ve logged into the wrong forum mate :lol:
PredatorHayds
Welterweight
Posts: 4886
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by PredatorHayds »

jamamb wrote: 09 Jan 2018, 06:12 another one brought to mind from the 'bad persons' thread in the other section:

im glad evil gerald mclellan got bashed in. karma for being an awful, evil , sadistic person who enjoyed torturing and killing animals that he made defenseless. geralds defenseless now too but at least he was allowed to defend himself vs benn.
Completely agree.
Roy Jones Jr involvement in all that stuff was conveniently swept under the rug to help with his media work.
Yes We Can
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2087
Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by Yes We Can »

John Simpson was the most robbed British fighter ever.

Prime steve Cunningham beats Prime David Hayes at 200. Hayes now overrated at the weight for 2 big wins without having any world class longevity.

Had they fought Amir Khan would have dominated Tim Bradley.

David Price pre Thompson would have Ko'd Tyson Fury, Thompsons chin was incredible, not many would have got through.
smiling assassin
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3196
Joined: 05 Jan 2012, 13:12

Re: cases where u/you disagree with most ppl

Post by smiling assassin »

Tomasino wrote: 10 Jan 2018, 12:43
smiling assassin wrote: 08 Dec 2017, 14:52 Most people disagree with me but I still think Jimmy Saville was a good man :TU:
Think you’ve logged into the wrong forum mate :lol:
:oops:
Post Reply