Off topic: a nasty bully gets a nasty shock

Manos de Oro
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1630
Joined: 21 Sep 2004, 12:10

Post by Manos de Oro »

Deserter wrote:In the West, by contrast, this is far from the case (quite rightly as far as I'm concerned as I'm a great believer in meritocracy).
Might be a meritocracy in principle but in reality it's more like a nepotocracy. Aside from the old boys at the top, we have too many middle-managers with no balls, heading reams of yes-men. The West, in general, is teeming with souless pudenda shuffling paper in utter, utter meaningless-ness, all to furnish a selection in the latest IKEA catalogue and keep up the facade they actually have a worthwhile purpose each morning. The vast majority blank it out because they either don't know the answer, or can't summon the gumption to do anything about it, content to live in denial. I'd never heard of it before, but that Indian system sounds sound, to be honest. :)
harrygreb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2341
Joined: 25 Jan 2006, 05:02

Post by harrygreb »

[quote="silkov"]The biggest problem today is that we live in a 'I want it culture' and there are many that know the only way that they are going to get it is to take it off someone else... add that to a loss of moral conscience, fear of God etc and you have a recipe for the sort of chaos that is our modern society...[/quote]

of all the posts about our degenerative society this one, above, is about right. but still doesnt explain [i]why[/i] things have become so "i want it now"
Sweet P
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3669
Joined: 23 Mar 2003, 04:18

Post by Sweet P »

Things like this happen in every country, Were there are poor people with drug habits there will always be crime. Thank god im 6'3 and 285 pounds else i would be targeted by these scum bags every time i venture out to night spots.
harrygreb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2341
Joined: 25 Jan 2006, 05:02

Post by harrygreb »

in my view it is not the fault of the thatcher govt that things are now as they are. i was a fierce opponent of that administration at the time and my views of that era and its hunger for greed has not changed. but the fault lies with the wave of new thinking then coming into psychology and child development some from america but much from europe and mostly from france. this is the neo marxist phenomena known as post modernism which wrecked all notions of good common sense when it came to child rearing and destroyed our previous well founded ideas on what was wrong and right. the new attitude bred an arena where the law had to understand more and punish less. parenting was corrupted and many of us were confused by how to bring up our children - the situation persists today. i have only given a brief outline of one area of the insidious nature of post modernism, but we have all been affected by it for better or worse since it arrived in our society during the thatcher era.
it is worth studying.
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Post by silkov »

I'm going to sound like an old fart now but I think much of the problem has to do with the breakdown of the family, and the proliferation of one parent families... I'm not saying this is the only reason but its a link in the chain...
dookus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4484
Joined: 17 May 2005, 06:00

Post by dookus »

silkov wrote:I'm going to sound like an old fart now but I think much of the problem has to do with the breakdown of the family, and the proliferation of one parent families... I'm not saying this is the only reason but its a link in the chain...
I have often thought that a couple of generations of families with both/the only parent working combined with the vast rise in "ways to occupy your mind without having to interact with other people" is responsible as much as anything for today's bizarre, imaginationless, apathetic children (and I'm a 22 year old)
harrygreb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2341
Joined: 25 Jan 2006, 05:02

Post by harrygreb »

mercman isnt it great to be able to discuss pomo on a boxing forum.
my view (briefly) is that post modernism was originated by french neo marxist intellectuals who, frustrated by their historical lack of influence on western society, decided to alter that society by attempting to change the way language is used. this proved incredibly effective; university doctorates began to be awarded to theses that were full of post modern nonsense. relativism and the idea that any one work was as good as another became prevalent in teaching. political correctness is an example of this rubbish. i myself gained a psychology degree which looking back now was loaded with postmodernist mumbo jumbo.
all i can say is that i hope boxing judges do not use postmodern criteria when deciding a match.
harrygreb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2341
Joined: 25 Jan 2006, 05:02

Post by harrygreb »

nice talking to you. who do you take de la hoya/mayorga?
do you think hatton can beat mayweather?
is foucaults elusive style going to be too much for derrida to deconstruct? :-?
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17155
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Post by Seamus »

Damn this is an interesting thread. Totally agree about the breakdown of the family and it's negative effects on society. Since 1980 in the States we've had a generation of kids grow up as the products of daycare, and no matter how much anyone wants to talk about the necessity of such institutions, bottom line is that it's resulted in countless instances of parents no longer knowing there own children. "We never knew Johnny was a Satanist or that Sally had been talking about suicide since she was 12" are the extreme examples, but generally speaking, after 5 years of working with teenagers in the 90's I was shocked to find out what kids never told there own parents. Sadly over here it just continues to get worse, as the latest fad is to medicate kids for any and all problems.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Post by Deserter »

mercman wrote:The Caste system is now officially outlawed in India. It was pretty good for those at the top but for those at the bottom - the Untouchables - it was a pretty awful system. They were treated badly, kept uneducated and forced to do all the degrading and undesirable tasks for everyone else. It allowed for no social mobility and wasted the talent of millions. If anything it can be equated to an apartheid system but justified by religion rather than race. Not good.
Officially outlawed, but as you're no doubt aware it still persists, particularly in rural areas.
Good post though and a cracking thread :TU:
harrygreb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2341
Joined: 25 Jan 2006, 05:02

Post by harrygreb »

fantastic!! :TU:
Post Reply