IBF announce formal name change, reveal brand new logo

Post Reply
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101501
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

IBF announce formal name change, reveal brand new logo

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

During a recent Board of Directors meeting, it was unanimously voted to drop “United States Boxing Association” (USBA) from its official moniker, which was the organization’s original name when it was founded in 1977. In 1983, however, members of the then USBA voted to expand the organization and create an international division.

Image

The vote resulted in the formation of the United States Boxing Association-International (USBA-I). One year later, in 1984, a vote was passed to change the name to the one it has operated under until now.

The decision to change the name once again was based mainly to clarify that the IBF is the sanctioning organization.

The USBA does not operate as a separate entity and will remain under the IBF umbrella. Fighters will continue to be ranked in the USBA ratings, and USBA titles will continue to be sanctioned.

“Aside from clarifying our business operations, changing the name to just ‘IBF’ was the logical progression since for many years now the organization has been referred to that way,” remarked IBF President Daryl Peoples.

Along with the name change, the sanctioning body is updating its logo to reflect the new name. The idea for the new logo essentially came from the IBF belt plate, with the addition of a more modern-looking font and a few more stars in blue to keep with the organization’s history and to reflect its American origin.

With the official name change and new logo, the IBF is going into its 35th year enthusiastically looking forward to great boxing in 2018.

http://www.worldboxingnews.net/2018/01/ ... d-new-logo
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: IBF announce formal name change, reveal brand new logo

Post by Boxing Prospect »

"We'll call our selves the same thing everyone else does"
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: IBF announce formal name change, reveal brand new logo

Post by SenorPipino »

Taking a look at it's ludicrous top 15 welterweight ratings (minus the top 2 spots which are mysteriously vacant) the IBF should forget about cosmetic name changes and consider disbanding altogether.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9453
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: IBF announce formal name change, reveal brand new logo

Post by tiny_acres »

Man I thought they changed it years ago.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46443
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: IBF announce formal name change, reveal brand new logo

Post by gilgamesh »

SenorPipino wrote: 22 Jan 2018, 14:59 Taking a look at it's ludicrous top 15 welterweight ratings (minus the top 2 spots which are mysteriously vacant) the IBF should forget about cosmetic name changes and consider disbanding altogether.
ALL title orgs should disband. None of 'em mean sh*t anymore.

Let the people, and the insiders of the sport crown the Champion. The Title orgs just get in the f*cking way, and prevent fights from happening. They're a detriment to the sport, and cheapen it greatly .
chinarich
Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 29 Dec 2013, 13:20

Re: IBF announce formal name change, reveal brand new logo

Post by chinarich »

So, the IBF, which everyone already knew as the IBF, has changed its name to the IBF. That’s brilliant, perhaps they should have used that time sorting out their rankings...
Mexi-Box
Welterweight
Posts: 3963
Joined: 24 Jan 2016, 16:19

Re: IBF announce formal name change, reveal brand new logo

Post by Mexi-Box »

gilgamesh wrote: 24 Jan 2018, 13:03
SenorPipino wrote: 22 Jan 2018, 14:59 Taking a look at it's ludicrous top 15 welterweight ratings (minus the top 2 spots which are mysteriously vacant) the IBF should forget about cosmetic name changes and consider disbanding altogether.
ALL title orgs should disband. None of 'em mean sh*t anymore.

Let the people, and the insiders of the sport crown the Champion. The Title orgs just get in the f*cking way, and prevent fights from happening. They're a detriment to the sport, and cheapen it greatly .
Yes they do for some fighters. A lot of fights wouldn't have happened if they didn't enforce mandatories. Dirrell/DeGale, Klitschko/Fury, and Nery/Yamanaka come to mind.

They're great for fighters that are being avoided, and they sometimes make great fights that come out of left field.
Post Reply