I agree.
I'm not quite sure why, but I find Wilder immensely irritating, I also find his actual face annoying.
Even so, I've nothing against him personally, and I don't have a reason to root for Ortiz, so I won't be rooting for anybody really.
I agree.
If Wilder fears him, he will use his jab and reach like he did in the first Stiverne fight.HeavyHitters wrote: ↑08 Feb 2018, 18:41 I'm going with Wilder here. Should be a good fight though. It will be interesting to see if Wilder can get Ortiz put of there early or not. There is a good chance Ortiz might last the distance, unless he gasses out.
The guy to watch for in the next 1.5 years is "Triple D", "Dangerous" Daniel Dubois!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Breazeale doesn't have a future in top boxing. He will just be a gatekeeper.asdfjkl wrote: ↑09 Feb 2018, 11:41 TBH I genuinly don't like Wilder and knowing Wilder, he already knows something that makes sure this fight will never actually happen. Somehow, despite I'd really like to see Wilder losing, I would have prefered to see it against other guys, who actually still have a future in this sport, like Miller, Kownacki, Breazeale, Junlong Zhang, Rivas, Dinu, Ugonoh, Hrgovic, Gashi, Tony Yoka, Dubois.
At this moment, I don't really care, Ortiz doesn't have a future, so he will lose his next fight against anyone reasonable anyway.
Because of this, may the best men win. And if the fight actually happens, I just hope it will have a fair endresult, not a moment like what happened between AJ and Takam, because Takam clearly wasn't ended at the moment the fight stopped.
I hear you man but The Wire had to keep it realistic and humble Omar. Omar was almost becoming super-human.candyslim wrote: ↑09 Feb 2018, 13:04 I voted "May the best man win" but I guess I hope that best man turns out to be Wilder.
Despite his drug history, I really like Ortiz. What I like most about him is his absolute belief in his own ability. Nothing illustrates this better than him risking his guaranteed mega retirement payout against Joshua by walking away from his WBA mandatory status in order to fight Wilder. He must have been so sure of beating Wilder and going on to fight AJ in a unification. There is no other explanation. That belief is about to be put to the test.
The trouble is Ortiz won't be around by 2020 so he isn't exactly the future of the heavyweight division. If Ortiz does expose Deontay's technical shortcomings and knocks him out, which is hardly a stretch of the imagination, then this will consign the most hotly anticipated showdown in the division, if not the whole of boxing., to the scrap-heap.
That will be like the massive finale that "The Wire" was moving toward, being scuppered by the kid shooting Omar. For those who don't know what I'm blathering about, I mean it'll be an enormous anti-climax.
Of course Parker could upset the apple-cart too.
He's still far better as anyone Wilder ever foughtsiablo14 wrote: ↑10 Feb 2018, 08:21Breazeale doesn't have a future in top boxing. He will just be a gatekeeper.asdfjkl wrote: ↑09 Feb 2018, 11:41 TBH I genuinly don't like Wilder and knowing Wilder, he already knows something that makes sure this fight will never actually happen. Somehow, despite I'd really like to see Wilder losing, I would have prefered to see it against other guys, who actually still have a future in this sport, like Miller, Kownacki, Breazeale, Junlong Zhang, Rivas, Dinu, Ugonoh, Hrgovic, Gashi, Tony Yoka, Dubois.
At this moment, I don't really care, Ortiz doesn't have a future, so he will lose his next fight against anyone reasonable anyway.
Because of this, may the best men win. And if the fight actually happens, I just hope it will have a fair endresult, not a moment like what happened between AJ and Takam, because Takam clearly wasn't ended at the moment the fight stopped.
I guess it also helped the ending was not controversial and Kownacki had won his match earlier in the night.candyslim wrote: ↑10 Feb 2018, 02:55Tony1244 wrote: ↑09 Feb 2018, 14:57
Do you remember the exact quote? I'm not saying its impossible that I was hypocritical, as I believe all humans are hypocrites sometimes.
cs: Well said Tony. On the basis that a thief is a thief even if he/she spends little time doing it, I always say 'we are all of us hypocrites and the biggest ones are those who would deny it'.
I don't think there is anything wrong with rooting for nationality. Rooting for color is a bit uglier to me, but people still have every right to do it.
cs: During the seventies I was conscious that boxing and my favourite division was dominated by black guys. I would tend to favour the white fighters if only to show that we could fight too. Since the entry of Eastern Europe into pro boxing balance has been largely restored and now I can truthfully say that the colour of a man's skin is simply irrelevant to me. The idea of rooting based on skin colour strikes me as distasteful but perhaps, given what I said about the seventies, that bears out what we said about hypocrisy.
What I was trying to say was that knowing many Eastern European fans root for their own against an American makes it a bit more fun to root for the American. I don't think there anything wrong with that. I saw Wilder-Spilkva live in Brooklyn and almost everyone had a good time, I guess except for Spilkva at the end.
cs: Aint that the truth! (Szpilka at the end)
He is probably on the same level as Stiverne.asdfjkl wrote: ↑10 Feb 2018, 09:16He's still far better as anyone Wilder ever foughtsiablo14 wrote: ↑10 Feb 2018, 08:21Breazeale doesn't have a future in top boxing. He will just be a gatekeeper.asdfjkl wrote: ↑09 Feb 2018, 11:41 TBH I genuinly don't like Wilder and knowing Wilder, he already knows something that makes sure this fight will never actually happen. Somehow, despite I'd really like to see Wilder losing, I would have prefered to see it against other guys, who actually still have a future in this sport, like Miller, Kownacki, Breazeale, Junlong Zhang, Rivas, Dinu, Ugonoh, Hrgovic, Gashi, Tony Yoka, Dubois.
At this moment, I don't really care, Ortiz doesn't have a future, so he will lose his next fight against anyone reasonable anyway.
Because of this, may the best men win. And if the fight actually happens, I just hope it will have a fair endresult, not a moment like what happened between AJ and Takam, because Takam clearly wasn't ended at the moment the fight stopped.
Lol, there are well over a 100 boxers who would beat Stiverne, including Breazeale and I already predicted this long before the Wilder fight. Even most of the top 100 cruiserweight would beat him easely. He would be a great opponent for Andre Ward for example, Andre can't lose that one and the Americans are dumb enough to think it's any kind of special.
Americans? Where are you from?asdfjkl wrote: ↑10 Feb 2018, 13:33Lol, there are well over a 100 boxers who would beat Stiverne, including Breazeale and I already predicted this long before the Wilder fight. Even most of the top 100 cruiserweight would beat him easely. He would be a great opponent for Andre Ward for example, Andre can't lose that one and the Americans are dumb enough to think it's any kind of special.
No he wasn't lol, he has never really been a solid opponent, Wilder just improved a tiny bit ever since. Come on, Wilder even struggled with Duhaupas! Who's most likely still his best opponent ever.siablo14 wrote: ↑10 Feb 2018, 13:45Americans? Where are you from?asdfjkl wrote: ↑10 Feb 2018, 13:33Lol, there are well over a 100 boxers who would beat Stiverne, including Breazeale and I already predicted this long before the Wilder fight. Even most of the top 100 cruiserweight would beat him easely. He would be a great opponent for Andre Ward for example, Andre can't lose that one and the Americans are dumb enough to think it's any kind of special.
Stiverne was a solid opponent in is first fight with Wilder. He was better than Charles Martin.
Yeah it's either Duhaupas or Stiverne (the first time he fought Stiverne not the totally unprepared schlub that stepped in the ring with Wilder for the rematch)asdfjkl wrote: ↑10 Feb 2018, 13:52No he wasn't lol, he has never really been a solid opponent, Wilder just improved a tiny bit ever since. Come on, Wilder even struggled with Duhaupas! Who's most likely still his best opponent ever.siablo14 wrote: ↑10 Feb 2018, 13:45Americans? Where are you from?asdfjkl wrote: ↑10 Feb 2018, 13:33
Lol, there are well over a 100 boxers who would beat Stiverne, including Breazeale and I already predicted this long before the Wilder fight. Even most of the top 100 cruiserweight would beat him easely. He would be a great opponent for Andre Ward for example, Andre can't lose that one and the Americans are dumb enough to think it's any kind of special.
Stiverne was a solid opponent in is first fight with Wilder. He was better than Charles Martin.
The Stiverne who lost against Demetrice King and was actually losing against Ray Austin? Hahahahahagilgamesh wrote: ↑10 Feb 2018, 13:56Yeah it's either Duhaupas or Stiverne (the first time he fought Stiverne not the totally unprepared schlub that stepped in the ring with Wilder for the rematch)
And had beaten Chris Arreola twice and was the defending WBC Champion at the time...if you're gonna say it, say it all.asdfjkl wrote: ↑10 Feb 2018, 14:07The Stiverne who lost against Demetrice King and was actually losing against Ray Austin? Hahahahaha
Oh come on, junky lightweight Arreola is even worse! Despite he send Wilder to hospital and out of the ring for a month or 7 and even needed a tune up fight against another bum after that!gilgamesh wrote: ↑10 Feb 2018, 14:12And had beaten Chris Arreola twice and was the defending WBC Champion at the time...if you're gonna say it, say it all.
Stiverne sucks. I know that. If you're trying to prove to me that Wilder sucks....you're preaching to the Choir. I f*cking hate Wilder and consider him an absolute coward...but even so he'd smash Briggs with ease. So would Stiverne. Briggs is a shot old man. Get that through your head.
I am not sold on Wilder. I am not a fan. I like technical fighters but Stiverne was a decent opponent in the first fight.asdfjkl wrote: ↑10 Feb 2018, 13:52No he wasn't lol, he has never really been a solid opponent, Wilder just improved a tiny bit ever since. Come on, Wilder even struggled with Duhaupas! Who's most likely still his best opponent ever.siablo14 wrote: ↑10 Feb 2018, 13:45Americans? Where are you from?asdfjkl wrote: ↑10 Feb 2018, 13:33
Lol, there are well over a 100 boxers who would beat Stiverne, including Breazeale and I already predicted this long before the Wilder fight. Even most of the top 100 cruiserweight would beat him easely. He would be a great opponent for Andre Ward for example, Andre can't lose that one and the Americans are dumb enough to think it's any kind of special.
Stiverne was a solid opponent in is first fight with Wilder. He was better than Charles Martin.
I can not agree, I think there are 7 fighters on the top level : Joshua, Wilder, Parker, Ortiz, Povetkin, Haye (fit) and Fury (fit).
Ray had the reach and height advantage and used it until he was KO. That's the same strategy Wilder use to win the first fight.asdfjkl wrote: ↑10 Feb 2018, 14:07The Stiverne who lost against Demetrice King and was actually losing against Ray Austin? Hahahahaha
Have you seen the "KO"? Ray was standing still with his hands up to the referee
Povetkin is just about finished, and looked pretty mediocre of late, but he definitely has one of the better resumes of any current active Heavyweight. So I consider him to be among the Top names at the moment.ValMar wrote: ↑10 Feb 2018, 14:30I can not agree, I think there are 7 fighters on the top level : Joshua, Wilder, Parker, Ortiz, Povetkin, Haye (fit) and Fury (fit).
A- level : Whyte, Pulev, Miller, perhaps Breazeale.
Tomorrow, we will have Usyk and Gassiev, and Dubois and Hrgović are coming, perhaps Joyce, too......
Joshua is No. 1, of course, and I would like to see him facing devoted and fit Fury.gilgamesh wrote: ↑10 Feb 2018, 14:55Povetkin is just about finished, and looked pretty mediocre of late, but he definitely has one of the better resumes of any current active Heavyweight. So I consider him to be among the Top names at the moment.ValMar wrote: ↑10 Feb 2018, 14:30I can not agree, I think there are 7 fighters on the top level : Joshua, Wilder, Parker, Ortiz, Povetkin, Haye (fit) and Fury (fit).
A- level : Whyte, Pulev, Miller, perhaps Breazeale.
Tomorrow, we will have Usyk and Gassiev, and Dubois and Hrgović are coming, perhaps Joyce, too......
Parker's time as pretending to be one of the "Top guys" ends when Joshua smashes him in one sided fashion, from that one point on he gets knocked down there with the Breazeale's and the Whyte's, and stays there because that's all he ever really was in the first place.
Haye's just too injury prone to ever be taken seriously as a meaningful contender again. He's finished.
Ortiz is still a credible contender now and one of the Top guys. I hope he does well against Wilder and remains a credible contender, but I kinda expect Wilder to just kinda kick his ass at this point to be honest. Just a gut feeling. We'll see how it goes.
Fury (fit)...If you don't take Boxing seriously it don't take you seriously, and he's gonna find that out the next time he's in there with a dangerous opponent.
Joshua is THE Top guy in the division at the moment until someone can prove otherwise.