Moron, idiot. No not really. Slight blurred vision. Doesn’t cause blindness noValMar wrote: ↑17 Feb 2018, 20:01....And blood from the cuts are leaking to his backside, (or his eyes, maybe) ? You, genius ?danconnollyeire wrote: ↑17 Feb 2018, 19:51Have you ever boxed? Cuts don’t cause sudden blindness you moron
eubank is one of the most overrated fighter in years
-
danconnollyeire
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
OK, I don't intend to argue with anyone. I am sure that my experience in the boxing and in the life generally is much more than yours, but, again, I will not argue......danconnollyeire wrote: ↑17 Feb 2018, 20:33Moron, idiot. No not really. Slight blurred vision. Doesn’t cause blindness noValMar wrote: ↑17 Feb 2018, 20:01....And blood from the cuts are leaking to his backside, (or his eyes, maybe) ? You, genius ?danconnollyeire wrote: ↑17 Feb 2018, 19:51
Have you ever boxed? Cuts don’t cause sudden blindness you moron
-
danconnollyeire
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
I highly doubt it you sound like a childValMar wrote: ↑17 Feb 2018, 20:40OK, I don't intend to argue with anyone. I am sure that my experience in the boxing and in the life generally is much more than yours, but, again, I will not argue......danconnollyeire wrote: ↑17 Feb 2018, 20:33Moron, idiot. No not really. Slight blurred vision. Doesn’t cause blindness no
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
Don't know Why people were tipping him too win. He just isn't that good.
-
SenorPipino
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 6055
- Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
This is the last time I put any faith in one of Carl Froch's guarantees.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32745
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
SenorPipino wrote: ↑17 Feb 2018, 20:54 This is the last time I put any faith in one of Carl Froch's guarantees.
-
SenorPipino
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 6055
- Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
Now you tell me.Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑17 Feb 2018, 20:56SenorPipino wrote: ↑17 Feb 2018, 20:54 This is the last time I put any faith in one of Carl Froch's guarantees.Carl Froch doesn’t even watch boxing
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
Was Eubank jr getting anything from his corner ? Are people in his corner even allowed to tell him what to do?
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
You can't polish a turd. He just doesn't have the technique to close the gap without rushing in headlong he has terrible footwork.
He's not going to improve much at all at from here. He's raw and not good enough to be a real world champion.
He's not going to improve much at all at from here. He's raw and not good enough to be a real world champion.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
Tell us what makes you so uniquely qualified to talk about boxing.ValMar wrote: ↑17 Feb 2018, 20:40OK, I don't intend to argue with anyone. I am sure that my experience in the boxing and in the life generally is much more than yours, but, again, I will not argue......danconnollyeire wrote: ↑17 Feb 2018, 20:33Moron, idiot. No not really. Slight blurred vision. Doesn’t cause blindness no
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
We believe most of the hype that polititions spout, its easy to be brainwashed into something thats not there.Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑17 Feb 2018, 19:28 The interesting question to me is - why was he overrated in the first place? Because he doesn’t have a single win at world level, he ducked a fight with GGG, and he’d already stepped up once at a lower weight and had his head boxed off by Saunders. Yet people were claiming he had all these talents and abilities that clearly he doesn’t have.
I’m not sure whether people just believed the hype he was spouting, or whether they genuinely thought they saw something in him which just isn’t there?
Eubank looked great on the heavy bag and shadow boxing, combine that with a load of old flannel day after day, reading his social media feeds and just being a Eubank its easy to get blinded by the glint of fools gold.
On paper Groves was truly the better man, but still watching Eubank pound that bag and listen to the blarney you forget whats written on paper.
Whats the saying? 'bullshit walks'
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
I called Groves to win and he did exactly what I thought; kept it long.
CEJ is very overrated and not a patch on his dad, who was at a different level. CEJ lacks power at SMW and can easily be outboxed. I was surprised in the size different between him and Groves: could CEJ make 160?
Don’t get me wrong, CEJ will learn from his but I just don’t think he will be a dominate champion, as he lacks the fundamentals. If you’ve not got a jab, you need to be able to work your way inside. On last nights performance, he can’t do that.
I will give him credit, his chin is like his dads and he does have heart.
CEJ is very overrated and not a patch on his dad, who was at a different level. CEJ lacks power at SMW and can easily be outboxed. I was surprised in the size different between him and Groves: could CEJ make 160?
Don’t get me wrong, CEJ will learn from his but I just don’t think he will be a dominate champion, as he lacks the fundamentals. If you’ve not got a jab, you need to be able to work your way inside. On last nights performance, he can’t do that.
I will give him credit, his chin is like his dads and he does have heart.
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
The way Eubanks jr was fighting remembered me of David Haye's tactics in the Tony Bellew fight
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
Agree. See my post. I think he should drop to 160.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑17 Feb 2018, 22:53 You can't polish a poop. He just doesn't have the technique to close the gap without rushing in headlong he has terrible footwork.
He's not going to improve much at all at from here. He's raw and not good enough to be a real world champion.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
You do realise Eubank was competing at 160 most of his career?Loki wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 07:10 I called Groves to win and he did exactly what I thought; kept it long.
CEJ is very overrated and not a patch on his dad, who was at a different level. CEJ lacks power at SMW and can easily be outboxed. I was surprised in the size different between him and Groves: could CEJ make 160?
Don’t get me wrong, CEJ will learn from his but I just don’t think he will be a dominate champion, as he lacks the fundamentals. If you’ve not got a jab, you need to be able to work your way inside. On last nights performance, he can’t do that.
I will give him credit, his chin is like his dads and he does have heart.
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
Of course. He fought all his fights until a few ago at that weight and lost to BJS. Unless he can’t make 160, I don’t understand why he’s moved up. Eubank Snr moves to 168 at 25, but his power seemed to carry. He lost a lot after the Watson tragedy. CEJ said at the post fight press conference he has options at 160.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 07:54You do realise Eubank was competing at 160 most of his career?Loki wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 07:10 I called Groves to win and he did exactly what I thought; kept it long.
CEJ is very overrated and not a patch on his dad, who was at a different level. CEJ lacks power at SMW and can easily be outboxed. I was surprised in the size different between him and Groves: could CEJ make 160?
Don’t get me wrong, CEJ will learn from his but I just don’t think he will be a dominate champion, as he lacks the fundamentals. If you’ve not got a jab, you need to be able to work your way inside. On last nights performance, he can’t do that.
I will give him credit, his chin is like his dads and he does have heart.
I can only assume he looked at 160 with GGG, Canelo, Jacobs and BJS and thought, fcuk this, 168 is weaker in depth and has a better chance to win a legitimate belt, not the unheralded IBO.
He needs to move down as his lack a jab, footwork and ability to get inside will make 168 more or less impossible. If you couple that with his power not carrying the extra weight on fight night, he can’t compete.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
The 168 tournament represented a big opportunity. However I think its exposed his level.Loki wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 08:07Of course. He fought all his fights until a few ago at that weight and lost to BJS. Unless he can’t make 160, I don’t understand why he’s moved up. Eubank Snr moves to 168 at 25, but his power seemed to carry. He lost a lot after the Watson tragedy. CEJ said at the post fight press conference he has options at 160.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 07:54You do realise Eubank was competing at 160 most of his career?Loki wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 07:10 I called Groves to win and he did exactly what I thought; kept it long.
CEJ is very overrated and not a patch on his dad, who was at a different level. CEJ lacks power at SMW and can easily be outboxed. I was surprised in the size different between him and Groves: could CEJ make 160?
Don’t get me wrong, CEJ will learn from his but I just don’t think he will be a dominate champion, as he lacks the fundamentals. If you’ve not got a jab, you need to be able to work your way inside. On last nights performance, he can’t do that.
I will give him credit, his chin is like his dads and he does have heart.
I can only assume he looked at 160 with GGG, Canelo, Jacobs and BJS and thought, fcuk this, 168 is weaker in depth and has a better chance to win a legitimate belt, not the unheralded IBO.
He needs to move down as his lack a jab, footwork and ability to get inside will make 168 more or less impossible. If you couple that with his power not carrying the extra weight on fight night, he can’t compete.
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
I think exposed is a little unkind. I do think he’s overrated as the sound bites had many people fooled. I just think he doesn’t have the attributes mainly physical to compete when his opponents come into the ring a lot bigger.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 08:08The 168 tournament represented a big opportunity. However I think its exposed his level.Loki wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 08:07Of course. He fought all his fights until a few ago at that weight and lost to BJS. Unless he can’t make 160, I don’t understand why he’s moved up. Eubank Snr moves to 168 at 25, but his power seemed to carry. He lost a lot after the Watson tragedy. CEJ said at the post fight press conference he has options at 160.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 07:54
You do realise Eubank was competing at 160 most of his career?
I can only assume he looked at 160 with GGG, Canelo, Jacobs and BJS and thought, fcuk this, 168 is weaker in depth and has a better chance to win a legitimate belt, not the unheralded IBO.
He needs to move down as his lack a jab, footwork and ability to get inside will make 168 more or less impossible. If you couple that with his power not carrying the extra weight on fight night, he can’t compete.
However, I do think he’s limited and can easily be outboxed. Thinking about it, perhaps your right but I feel he will feel better at 160.
Do you know how much Groves weighed fight night?
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
Groves weighed 184lbs last night... only 2lbs lighter than when Evander Holyfield defeated Dwight Muhammad Qawi during their first world title bout.
Chris Eubank Sr. was also only 2lbs heavier than what George Groves weighed last night for his first cruiserweight bout against Carl Thompson.
Last edited by Enlightened-One on 18 Feb 2018, 08:32, edited 2 times in total.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
It's not mainly physical. He has piss poor technique, wide open, no defence, squares his feet up, no jab, no idea how to close the gap intelligently, his poor balance means his power is also not great.Loki wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 08:16I think exposed is a little unkind. I do think he’s overrated as the sound bites had many people fooled. I just think he doesn’t have the attributes mainly physical to compete when his opponents come into the ring a lot bigger.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 08:08The 168 tournament represented a big opportunity. However I think its exposed his level.Loki wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 08:07
Of course. He fought all his fights until a few ago at that weight and lost to BJS. Unless he can’t make 160, I don’t understand why he’s moved up. Eubank Snr moves to 168 at 25, but his power seemed to carry. He lost a lot after the Watson tragedy. CEJ said at the post fight press conference he has options at 160.
I can only assume he looked at 160 with GGG, Canelo, Jacobs and BJS and thought, fcuk this, 168 is weaker in depth and has a better chance to win a legitimate belt, not the unheralded IBO.
He needs to move down as his lack a jab, footwork and ability to get inside will make 168 more or less impossible. If you couple that with his power not carrying the extra weight on fight night, he can’t compete.
However, I do think he’s limited and can easily be outboxed. Thinking about it, perhaps your right but I feel he will feel better at 160.
Do you know how much Groves weighed fight night?
At 160 he is very strong and probably stronger than most of his opponents, but even then he isnt good enough to beat the top guys. I'd say hes around the level of a lemiueux, though technically lemiueux is better.
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
I agree with all this, apart from him being worse than Lemieux. Lemieux has tremendous power but cmon, although Eubank was over hyped, he’s surely better technically than Lemiuex. Although I never judge fights against different opponents, the BJS fights against both must be paramount in terms of technique. BJS was motivated for both fights.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 08:23It's not mainly physical. He has piss poor technique, wide open, no defence, squares his feet up, no jab, no idea how to close the gap intelligently, his poor balance means his power is also not great.Loki wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 08:16I think exposed is a little unkind. I do think he’s overrated as the sound bites had many people fooled. I just think he doesn’t have the attributes mainly physical to compete when his opponents come into the ring a lot bigger.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 08:08
The 168 tournament represented a big opportunity. However I think its exposed his level.
However, I do think he’s limited and can easily be outboxed. Thinking about it, perhaps your right but I feel he will feel better at 160.
Do you know how much Groves weighed fight night?
At 160 he is very strong and probably stronger than most of his opponents, but even then he isnt good enough to beat the top guys. I'd say hes around the level of a lemiueux, though technically lemiueux is better.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
Loki wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 08:50I agree with all this, apart from him being worse than Lemieux. Lemieux has tremendous power but cmon, although Eubank was over hyped, he’s surely better technically than Lemiuex. Although I never judge fights against different opponents, the BJS fights against both must be paramount in terms of technique. BJS was motivated for both fights.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 08:23It's not mainly physical. He has piss poor technique, wide open, no defence, squares his feet up, no jab, no idea how to close the gap intelligently, his poor balance means his power is also not great.Loki wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 08:16
I think exposed is a little unkind. I do think he’s overrated as the sound bites had many people fooled. I just think he doesn’t have the attributes mainly physical to compete when his opponents come into the ring a lot bigger.
However, I do think he’s limited and can easily be outboxed. Thinking about it, perhaps your right but I feel he will feel better at 160.
Do you know how much Groves weighed fight night?
At 160 he is very strong and probably stronger than most of his opponents, but even then he isnt good enough to beat the top guys. I'd say hes around the level of a lemiueux, though technically lemiueux is better.
I think lemeiux would spark jr
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
Saunders was clearly in poor condition for the Eubank fight.Loki wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 08:50I agree with all this, apart from him being worse than Lemieux. Lemieux has tremendous power but cmon, although Eubank was over hyped, he’s surely better technically than Lemiuex. Although I never judge fights against different opponents, the BJS fights against both must be paramount in terms of technique. BJS was motivated for both fights.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 08:23It's not mainly physical. He has piss poor technique, wide open, no defence, squares his feet up, no jab, no idea how to close the gap intelligently, his poor balance means his power is also not great.Loki wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 08:16
I think exposed is a little unkind. I do think he’s overrated as the sound bites had many people fooled. I just think he doesn’t have the attributes mainly physical to compete when his opponents come into the ring a lot bigger.
However, I do think he’s limited and can easily be outboxed. Thinking about it, perhaps your right but I feel he will feel better at 160.
Do you know how much Groves weighed fight night?
At 160 he is very strong and probably stronger than most of his opponents, but even then he isnt good enough to beat the top guys. I'd say hes around the level of a lemiueux, though technically lemiueux is better.
Lemieux can be outboxed, but his punch technique is in another galaxy to Jr's, Eubank generates power by launching his entire body into the punch, as a consequence he is usually off balance, with his chin sticking up in the air like a kid holding a toffee apple, if he does that against Lemieux, he's getting knocked out. Jr has a good chin, but Groves showed he can be hurt, there should have been at least one knockdown scored last night, and possibly two.
-
danconnollyeire
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
GGG, Alvarez, BJS batter himLoki wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 07:36Agree. See my post. I think he should drop to 160.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑17 Feb 2018, 22:53 You can't polish a poop. He just doesn't have the technique to close the gap without rushing in headlong he has terrible footwork.
He's not going to improve much at all at from here. He's raw and not good enough to be a real world champion.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: eubank is the most overrated fighter in years
BJS barely won the first fight which could've easily scored as a draw.danconnollyeire wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 14:47GGG, Alvarez, BJS batter himLoki wrote: ↑18 Feb 2018, 07:36Agree. See my post. I think he should drop to 160.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑17 Feb 2018, 22:53 You can't polish a poop. He just doesn't have the technique to close the gap without rushing in headlong he has terrible footwork.
He's not going to improve much at all at from here. He's raw and not good enough to be a real world champion.