CompuBox by the Numbers: Stats 3/9 & 3/10 Showtime, 3/9 ESPN

Post Reply
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101440
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

CompuBox by the Numbers: Stats 3/9 & 3/10 Showtime, 3/9 ESPN

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Interesting article I came across courtesy of CompuBox..

8—avg. jabs landed per round by Ivan Baranchyk in his KO win over Petr Petrov- double what he landed in his previous 2 fights

12-- punches landed per round by Sergey Lipinets, 30% higher than Mikey Garcia’s previous 7 opponents

21 & 11—avg. punches landed per round by Kiryl Relikh and Rances Barthelemy respectively in their two fights- nearly a 2-1 edge for Relikh

57—punches landed by Brandon Figueroa in round 3 of his 7th round ko win over Geovanny Delgado, more than three times the 122lb avg.

64 –power punch connect percentage for Regis Prograis in the second round of his destructive KO win over Julius Indondo- jr. welter avg.: 36%

103 & 41—avg. punches thrown per round by Kiryl Relikh and Rances Barthelemy respectively in Relikh’s one-sided decision win in rematch of their controversial first fight- jr. welter avg.: 59

127 – punches averaged per round by Brandon Figueroa vs. Geovanny Delgado, more than double the 122lb avg.

129--power punches landed by Scott Quigg on Oscar Valdez, most by a Valdez opponent in 16 of his fights tracked by CompuBox

176—punches thrown by Brandon Figueroa in round 3 of his 7th round ko win over Geovanny Delgado, the second highest total for a 122-lb fight in CompuBox history and nearly three times more than the 122-lb weight class avg.

249-137 –edge in punches landed by Kiryl Relikh over Rances Barthelemy in their rematch- nearly identical totals from their first fight

248-137- edge in punches landed by Kiryl Relikh over Rances Barthelemy in their first fight, scored unanimously for Barthelemy

485--power punches thrown by Oscar Valdez vs. Scott Quigg, most by Valdez in 16 of his fights tracked by CompuBox
Deleted_Scenes
Middleweight
Posts: 633
Joined: 29 Oct 2013, 17:02

Re: CompuBox by the Numbers: Stats 3/9 & 3/10 Showtime, 3/9 ESPN

Post by Deleted_Scenes »

Couple of interesting statistics, but I never know how much to trust compubox. It's just a couple of people pressing buttons in real time, based on what they think they see.

Slow motion replays (and the people with enough time on their hands to sit through them) have shown on multiple occasions that the numbers that get published aren't much more reliable than your average Adelaide Byrd scorecard. Plus, there's no accounting for how much damage any particular punch does.

Then you get fans who use these numbers as some sort of gospel for showing who the 'real' winner is in a close fight... Go figure.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101440
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: CompuBox by the Numbers: Stats 3/9 & 3/10 Showtime, 3/9 ESPN

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Deleted_Scenes wrote: 12 Mar 2018, 09:44 Couple of interesting statistics, but I never know how much to trust compubox. It's just a couple of people pressing buttons in real time, based on what they think they see.

Slow motion replays (and the people with enough time on their hands to sit through them) have shown on multiple occasions that the numbers that get published aren't much more reliable than your average Adelaide Byrd scorecard. Plus, there's no accounting for how much damage any particular punch does.

Then you get fans who use these numbers as some sort of gospel for showing who the 'real' winner is in a close fight... Go figure.
That's the part I hate. Using the stats to determine who actually wins a fight is ridiculous.

Some will say GGG landed more power shots so should win, then Canelo fans will say he was more accurate? Then some will say GGG was more effective with the jab.. and it just goes on..
Deleted_Scenes
Middleweight
Posts: 633
Joined: 29 Oct 2013, 17:02

Re: CompuBox by the Numbers: Stats 3/9 & 3/10 Showtime, 3/9 ESPN

Post by Deleted_Scenes »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 12 Mar 2018, 09:53
Deleted_Scenes wrote: 12 Mar 2018, 09:44 Couple of interesting statistics, but I never know how much to trust compubox. It's just a couple of people pressing buttons in real time, based on what they think they see.

Slow motion replays (and the people with enough time on their hands to sit through them) have shown on multiple occasions that the numbers that get published aren't much more reliable than your average Adelaide Byrd scorecard. Plus, there's no accounting for how much damage any particular punch does.

Then you get fans who use these numbers as some sort of gospel for showing who the 'real' winner is in a close fight... Go figure.
That's the part I hate. Using the stats to determine who actually wins a fight is ridiculous.

Some will say GGG landed more power shots so should win, then Canelo fans will say he was more accurate? Then some will say GGG was more effective with the jab.. and it just goes on..
Agreed. They're an item of interest sometimes, so I wouldn't say get rid of them. When it comes to scoring a fight though, stick to the proper criteria. :TU:
Post Reply