What does it take to be #1 ATG?

jas80s
Cruiserweight
Posts: 572
Joined: 15 Oct 2010, 20:55

Re: What does it take to be #1 ATG?

Post by jas80s »

Syntax Error wrote: 25 Mar 2018, 15:19
jezzamundo wrote: 18 Mar 2018, 00:30 I think it's pretty much impossible for a modern boxer to be considered the ATG. True greatness comes from fighting the best fighters in your era in their primes and ideally they too should have fought plenty of top prime fighters too. This happens pretty rarely these days, plus boxers fight less frequently.
:clap: :clap:

Spot on.

Too many of the best don't fight each other nowadays & fight too infrequently.

Top line fighters fight about three times a year if you're lucky & the top PPV cash cows will fight no more than 2 fights a year: If your name is Keith Thurman, that goes down to once a year.

It is very unlikely that a modern fighter will have enough years on the planet to have all the fights necessary to ever be number 1 ATG.
But, we will undoubtedly start to see more guys retiring with glossier records as fighters are no longer required to fight so often to make money. Some people will be swayed by that and rate those guys quite highly under the heading that they were so dominant and were never knocked out or beaten by "subpar" fighters. It will be interesting to see what the legacy becomes in this new era in boxing.

Personally, I think you just can't make comparisons. But, many will..and some will rate this newer generation more highly since they don't choose to consider the nuance of the situation. There are guys around who would have been great boxers in any era, though...let's be fair.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: What does it take to be #1 ATG?

Post by Kalan »

jas80s wrote: 25 Mar 2018, 15:52
Syntax Error wrote: 25 Mar 2018, 15:19
jezzamundo wrote: 18 Mar 2018, 00:30 I think it's pretty much impossible for a modern boxer to be considered the ATG. True greatness comes from fighting the best fighters in your era in their primes and ideally they too should have fought plenty of top prime fighters too. This happens pretty rarely these days, plus boxers fight less frequently.
:clap: :clap:

Spot on.

Too many of the best don't fight each other nowadays & fight too infrequently.

Top line fighters fight about three times a year if you're lucky & the top PPV cash cows will fight no more than 2 fights a year: If your name is Keith Thurman, that goes down to once a year.

It is very unlikely that a modern fighter will have enough years on the planet to have all the fights necessary to ever be number 1 ATG.
But, we will undoubtedly start to see more guys retiring with glossier records as fighters are no longer required to fight so often to make money. Some people will be swayed by that and rate those guys quite highly under the heading that they were so dominant and were never knocked out or beaten by "subpar" fighters. It will be interesting to see what the legacy becomes in this new era in boxing.

Personally, I think you just can't make comparisons. But, many will..and some will rate this newer generation more highly since they don't choose to consider the nuance of the situation. There are guys around who would have been great boxers in any era, though...let's be fair.
Right... Let's be fair, but guys like Syntax and Jezza don't want to be fair...

Gennady Golovkin is going into his 2nd fight with Canelo Alvarez, who is widely considered the 2nd best Middleweight on the planet... GGG has already beaten a super outstanding Middleweight Champion in Daniel Jacobs... Sugar Ray Robinson never faced a single Challenger or Champion with the size, height, reach, punching power, and boxing skills of Jacobs in his entire career... GGG's last 3 opponents prior to the 49-1-2 Canelo were a combined 86-1 when he faced them.

Golovkin is undefeated in 18 Middleweight Title Defenses with 16 KO wins... Robinson was 3-3 in Middleweight Title Defenses with 2 KO's... One of his losses was to a small Welterweight who had 12 previous losses... The other Middleweight Challengers Robinson faced were poorly skilled and nothing to write home about... Fullmer? .... Olsen? .... Turpin? .... Graziano? wow.

Graziano for instance, had been knocked out twice by Tony Zale and was about as easy to hit as you can imagine... He caught Robinson with a loaded swing that shouldn't hit a good boxer in the ass -- and decked him.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: What does it take to be #1 ATG?

Post by Kalan »

BTW... That was one of the many times Robinson was knocked down by boxers who lacked skills... How many times has Golovkin been knocked down in almost 400 amateur and professional fights??? ... He's never been knocked down.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9009
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: What does it take to be #1 ATG?

Post by Syntax Error »

Kalan wrote: 25 Mar 2018, 16:35
jas80s wrote: 25 Mar 2018, 15:52
Syntax Error wrote: 25 Mar 2018, 15:19

:clap: :clap:

Spot on.

Too many of the best don't fight each other nowadays & fight too infrequently.

Top line fighters fight about three times a year if you're lucky & the top PPV cash cows will fight no more than 2 fights a year: If your name is Keith Thurman, that goes down to once a year.

It is very unlikely that a modern fighter will have enough years on the planet to have all the fights necessary to ever be number 1 ATG.
But, we will undoubtedly start to see more guys retiring with glossier records as fighters are no longer required to fight so often to make money. Some people will be swayed by that and rate those guys quite highly under the heading that they were so dominant and were never knocked out or beaten by "subpar" fighters. It will be interesting to see what the legacy becomes in this new era in boxing.

Personally, I think you just can't make comparisons. But, many will..and some will rate this newer generation more highly since they don't choose to consider the nuance of the situation. There are guys around who would have been great boxers in any era, though...let's be fair.
Right... Let's be fair, but guys like Syntax and Jezza don't want to be fair...

Gennady Golovkin is going into his 2nd fight with Canelo Alvarez, who is widely considered the 2nd best Middleweight on the planet... GGG has already beaten a super outstanding Middleweight Champion in Daniel Jacobs... Sugar Ray Robinson never faced a single Challenger or Champion with the size, height, reach, punching power, and boxing skills of Jacobs in his entire career... GGG's last 3 opponents prior to the 49-1-2 Canelo were a combined 86-1 when he faced them.

Golovkin is undefeated in 18 Middleweight Title Defenses with 16 KO wins... Robinson was 3-3 in Middleweight Title Defenses with 2 KO's... One of his losses was to a small Welterweight who had 12 previous losses... The other Middleweight Challengers Robinson faced were poorly skilled and nothing to write home about... Fullmer? .... Olsen? .... Turpin? .... Graziano? wow.

Graziano for instance, had been knocked out twice by Tony Zale and was about as easy to hit as you can imagine... He caught Robinson with a loaded swing that shouldn't hit a good boxer in the ass -- and decked him.
Kalan, I think you have misconstrued what I have said.

I never said modern fighters aren't worthy of the mythical accolade; I said I think it is unlikely that a modern fighter will ever be granted that accolade because there are just too many politics in boxing, meaning the defining fights rarely if ever happen.

They don't fight each & they don't fight often enough.

You've cited Golovkin & he's a good pick, but part from Canelo, he hasn't a truly defining fight.

Take Errol Spence Jr for example, one of the best fighters to put on a pair of boxing gloves, but he is yet to have a defining fight in a division that his stacked with talent & he's 28 years old.

Imagine Spence Jr could fight & beat all the other main protagonists at 147 in great fashion; he'd be a lock for ATG #1 status at WW, but you & I know, it probably won't happen, because he'll be about 68 by the time that happens.

At least with the old-timers, they fought each other, often on a good few occasions.

They took they knocks, they endured some tribulations, but they came back & proved themselves.

Guys like Robinson absolutely deserve their accolades, even if they records are not perfect & fluffy.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: What does it take to be #1 ATG?

Post by Kalan »

Well... Robinson's record is damned fluffy and far from perfect... It’s padded with 150 third rate opponents who provided no comp, but yet he managed to lose some of those.

Modern Fighters fight each other more in important fights... A lot of ATG’s of the past DIDN’T fight.

Dempsey went 3 years without fighting when he held the title... Foreman went 10 years without a fight... Holmes and Foreman were close to the same age and ATG Heavyweight Champions... They never fought... Tyson went 4 years without a fight... Ali went 3 years without fighting... Robinson took a couple years off to avoid a rematch with Maxim and never did fight Charley Burley... Robinson sure as Hell never fought Gustav Scholz who went undefeated in his first 68 fights (far longer than SRR). And Robinson never fought anyone as “defining” as Daniel Jacobs.

Jacobs would have beaten the FK out of Robinson. Sugar Ray Leonard abandoned the Middleweight Title to avoid Michael Nunn and Mike McCallum who would have knocked the crap out of him. And look at skinny assed Tommy Hearns. He got knocked out by Iran Barkley. Barkley got beaten by James Toney, Michael Nunn, Nigel Benn, Sumbu Kalambay and others... Did Hearns ever fight any of those guys??? HELL NO they would have crushed him.

And don’t worry about it.. Mayweather fought Pacquio... Wilder fought Ortiz... Golovkin and Canelo will fight at least twice... Spence fought Brook and WILL fight Thurman... Lomachenko and Russell fought... Lomachenko and Walters fought... Lomachenko and Rigondeaux fought... Lomachenko and Mikey might fight... Joshua vs Parker is happening… Joshua vs Wilder WILL happen.. Did Lewis vs Bowe happen??? Hell NO it DIDN'T!!! ..... The Cruiserweight Division is happening and all the top Cruiserweights are fighting each other.
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: What does it take to be #1 ATG?

Post by Lackeos »

Kalan wrote: 26 Mar 2018, 01:42 Well... Robinson's record is damned fluffy and far from perfect... It’s padded with 150 third rate opponents who provided no comp, but yet he managed to lose some of those.
Robinson did not receive an unavenged loss until his 137th fight, in which he lost to a future hall of famer that outweighed him by 16 pounds. He announced his retirement after this, which would last for 2.5 years. This was the end of his prime.

Lomachenko is 10-1. He has unavenged losses right now, and he's only 11 fights into his career.

Kalan's like "CAN YOU BELIEVE ROBINSON HAS LOSSES?! HE CAN'T BE #1 ALL-TIME WITH LOSSES ON HIS RECORD! LOMACHENKO IS #1 ALL-TIME!" (Lomachenko has losses on his record.)
Last edited by Lackeos on 26 Mar 2018, 18:53, edited 1 time in total.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: What does it take to be #1 ATG?

Post by oogiebe »

Lackeos wrote: 26 Mar 2018, 18:49
Kalan wrote: 26 Mar 2018, 01:42 Well... Robinson's record is damned fluffy and far from perfect... It’s padded with 150 third rate opponents who provided no comp, but yet he managed to lose some of those.
Robinson did not receive an unavenged loss until his 137th fight, in which he lost to a future hall of famer that outweighed him by 16 pounds. He announced his retirement after this, which would last for 2.5 years. This was the end of his prime.
SRR...best ever...Best of him on film in prime is practically non-existent, unfortunately for us all.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: What does it take to be #1 ATG?

Post by Kalan »

oogiebe wrote: 26 Mar 2018, 18:51
Lackeos wrote: 26 Mar 2018, 18:49
Kalan wrote: 26 Mar 2018, 01:42 Well... Robinson's record is damned fluffy and far from perfect... It’s padded with 150 third rate opponents who provided no comp, but yet he managed to lose some of those.
Robinson did not receive an unavenged loss until his 137th fight, in which he lost to a future hall of famer that outweighed him by 16 pounds. He announced his retirement after this, which would last for 2.5 years. This was the end of his prime.
SRR...best ever...Best of him on film in prime is practically non-existent, unfortunately for us all.
Bullcrap....you're acting like a Mike Tyson fan... Any loss was past his prime... Ralph Jones lost 5 straight fights and beat the living crap out of a primetime 33-year-old Robinson... Screw unavenged... He lost badly to Turpin in his prime... Any ATG Middleweight beats Turpin... Besides losing a lot of fights, Robinson got knocked down a lot... And I don't care about 137 fights if 110 of them are against guys you wouldn't hire as sparring partners.
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: What does it take to be #1 ATG?

Post by ewenhay »

Kalan wrote: 27 Mar 2018, 02:08
oogiebe wrote: 26 Mar 2018, 18:51
Lackeos wrote: 26 Mar 2018, 18:49
Robinson did not receive an unavenged loss until his 137th fight, in which he lost to a future hall of famer that outweighed him by 16 pounds. He announced his retirement after this, which would last for 2.5 years. This was the end of his prime.
SRR...best ever...Best of him on film in prime is practically non-existent, unfortunately for us all.
Bullcrap....you're acting like a Mike Tyson fan... Any loss was past his prime... Ralph Jones lost 5 straight fights and beat the living crap out of a primetime 33-year-old Robinson... Screw unavenged... He lost badly to Turpin in his prime... Any ATG Middleweight beats Turpin... Besides losing a lot of fights, Robinson got knocked down a lot... And I don't care about 137 fights if 110 of them are against guys you wouldn't hire as sparring partners.
I agree there are quite a few ATG middleweights who beat Robinson but you should really rate him at his best weight, welterweight, where he has very few, if any equals.

Ranking Robinson at middleweight is the equivalent of ranking Eric Morales at light welterweight.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: What does it take to be #1 ATG?

Post by Counter-puncher »

ewenhay wrote: 27 Mar 2018, 14:25
Kalan wrote: 27 Mar 2018, 02:08
oogiebe wrote: 26 Mar 2018, 18:51

SRR...best ever...Best of him on film in prime is practically non-existent, unfortunately for us all.
Bullcrap....you're acting like a Mike Tyson fan... Any loss was past his prime... Ralph Jones lost 5 straight fights and beat the living crap out of a primetime 33-year-old Robinson... Screw unavenged... He lost badly to Turpin in his prime... Any ATG Middleweight beats Turpin... Besides losing a lot of fights, Robinson got knocked down a lot... And I don't care about 137 fights if 110 of them are against guys you wouldn't hire as sparring partners.
I agree there are quite a few ATG middleweights who beat Robinson but you should really rate him at his best weight, welterweight, where he has very few, if any equals.

Ranking Robinson at middleweight is the equivalent of ranking Eric Morales at light welterweight.
:TU:
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: What does it take to be #1 ATG?

Post by Kalan »

ewenhay wrote: 27 Mar 2018, 14:25
Kalan wrote: 27 Mar 2018, 02:08
oogiebe wrote: 26 Mar 2018, 18:51

SRR...best ever...Best of him on film in prime is practically non-existent, unfortunately for us all.
Bullcrap....you're acting like a Mike Tyson fan... Any loss was past his prime... Ralph Jones lost 5 straight fights and beat the living crap out of a primetime 33-year-old Robinson... Screw unavenged... He lost badly to Turpin in his prime... Any ATG Middleweight beats Turpin... Besides losing a lot of fights, Robinson got knocked down a lot... And I don't care about 137 fights if 110 of them are against guys you wouldn't hire as sparring partners.
I agree there are quite a few ATG middleweights who beat Robinson but you should really rate him at his best weight, welterweight, where he has very few, if any equals.

Ranking Robinson at middleweight is the equivalent of ranking Eric Morales at light welterweight.
Robinson had 5 Welterweight Title Defenses... Mostly versus guys you never heard of.

The only 2 name Welterweight Challengers or Champions Robinson beat when he was a Welteweight were 1. Kid Gavilan... Gavilan, who had several losses and a very low KO ratio... That disqualifies anyone today... and 2. Henry Armstrong. That was a horrible fight because Armstrong seemed to be past it and didn't even try... The fight was booed to death..

In contrast, Felex Trinidad defended the Welterweight Title 15 times against such ATG challengers as Oscar De La Hoya and Pernell Whitaker... He also beat Hector Camacho another great fighter of good renown.

As Middleweight Champion, Robinson was beaten by Challenger Carmen Basilio, who was a Welterweight coming up in weight... Basilio had 12 losses and gave up 5 inches in height to Robinson... They certainly didn't look like 2 of the best boxers ever -- or even among the top 100... They were both tagged with a great many punches and Robinson lost.
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: What does it take to be #1 ATG?

Post by ewenhay »

Kalan wrote: 27 Mar 2018, 16:42
ewenhay wrote: 27 Mar 2018, 14:25
Kalan wrote: 27 Mar 2018, 02:08

Bullcrap....you're acting like a Mike Tyson fan... Any loss was past his prime... Ralph Jones lost 5 straight fights and beat the living crap out of a primetime 33-year-old Robinson... Screw unavenged... He lost badly to Turpin in his prime... Any ATG Middleweight beats Turpin... Besides losing a lot of fights, Robinson got knocked down a lot... And I don't care about 137 fights if 110 of them are against guys you wouldn't hire as sparring partners.
I agree there are quite a few ATG middleweights who beat Robinson but you should really rate him at his best weight, welterweight, where he has very few, if any equals.

Ranking Robinson at middleweight is the equivalent of ranking Eric Morales at light welterweight.
Robinson had 5 Welterweight Title Defenses... Mostly versus guys you never heard of.

The only 2 name Welterweight Challengers or Champions Robinson beat when he was a Welteweight were 1. Kid Gavilan... Gavilan, who had several losses and a very low KO ratio... That disqualifies anyone today... and 2. Henry Armstrong. That was a horrible fight because Armstrong seemed to be past it and didn't even try... The fight was booed to death..

In contrast, Felex Trinidad defended the Welterweight Title 15 times against such ATG challengers as Oscar De La Hoya and Pernell Whitaker... He also beat Hector Camacho another great fighter of good renown.

As Middleweight Champion, Robinson was beaten by Challenger Carmen Basilio, who was a Welterweight coming up in weight... Basilio had 12 losses and gave up 5 inches in height to Robinson... They certainly didn't look like 2 of the best boxers ever -- or even among the top 100... They were both tagged with a great many punches.
I know you think Robinson is over rated and that's cool, it's all about opinions. All I'm saying is that the vast majority of his career was at welterweight where he was practically unbeatable. You also have to remember that there was only one title belt in those days so it took longer to get a title shot and it was harder to keep the belt so comparisons with Trinidad on that basis are flawed. But I know you know all this already.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: What does it take to be #1 ATG?

Post by Kalan »

ewenhay wrote: 27 Mar 2018, 16:48
Kalan wrote: 27 Mar 2018, 16:42
ewenhay wrote: 27 Mar 2018, 14:25

I agree there are quite a few ATG middleweights who beat Robinson but you should really rate him at his best weight, welterweight, where he has very few, if any equals.

Ranking Robinson at middleweight is the equivalent of ranking Eric Morales at light welterweight.
Robinson had 5 Welterweight Title Defenses... Mostly versus guys you never heard of.

The only 2 name Welterweight Challengers or Champions Robinson beat when he was a Welteweight were 1. Kid Gavilan... Gavilan, who had several losses and a very low KO ratio... That disqualifies anyone today... and 2. Henry Armstrong. That was a horrible fight because Armstrong seemed to be past it and didn't even try... The fight was booed to death..

In contrast, Felex Trinidad defended the Welterweight Title 15 times against such ATG challengers as Oscar De La Hoya and Pernell Whitaker... He also beat Hector Camacho another great fighter of good renown.

As Middleweight Champion, Robinson was beaten by Challenger Carmen Basilio, who was a Welterweight coming up in weight... Basilio had 12 losses and gave up 5 inches in height to Robinson... They certainly didn't look like 2 of the best boxers ever -- or even among the top 100... They were both tagged with a great many punches.
I know you think Robinson is over rated and that's cool, it's all about opinions. All I'm saying is that the vast majority of his career was at welterweight where he was practically unbeatable. You also have to remember that there was only one title belt in those days so it took longer to get a title shot and it was harder to keep the belt so comparisons with Trinidad on that basis are flawed. But I know you know all this already.
Robinson padded his record forever at Welterweight before he became Champion... and finally he fought a 2nd rater with 10 losses for a vacant belt... Afterwards he picked and chose his Challengers with care and they were generally terrible... He defended his his Welterweight Title very seldom, so it wasn't hard to keep the belt at all... I wouldn't call him unbeatable, because Welterweight Tommy Bell (who had 10 losses) decked Robinson really hard and gave him a tough distance fight... Imagine what somebody like Errol Spence or Mickey Walker would do.

Especially when you consider that Welterweight Carmen Basilio (12 losses) beat Robinson when he was giving up a ton of height, weight, and reach... Robinson NEVER fought a decent southpaw so Spence would rip the shitt out of him.
Post Reply