Both Joshua and Povetkin had ambiguous perfomances
Re: Both Joshua and Povetkin had ambiguous perfomances
[quote=oogiebe post_id=4889199 time=1522675542 user_id=53017}
I love your posts, Husker!!!! LMAO!!!!!
[/quote]
Jesus I do hope that was sarcasm. Beggars belief anyone could be impressed by that puerile wanker's childish insults.
I love your posts, Husker!!!! LMAO!!!!!
[/quote]
Jesus I do hope that was sarcasm. Beggars belief anyone could be impressed by that puerile wanker's childish insults.
Re: Both Joshua and Povetkin had ambiguous perfomances
Jesus I do hope that was sarcasm. Beggars belief anyone could be impressed by that puerile wanker's childish insults.
[/quote]
I'm not impressed by it...I'm humoured by it.
Re: Both Joshua and Povetkin had ambiguous perfomances
Good, Povetkin does a lot more for Joshua than Wilder. FFS, Wilder has no chance. Only fanboys think he has an ounce of a chance to beat Joshua.
Re: Both Joshua and Povetkin had ambiguous perfomances
I'll disagree with the second part of that. That is unfair. You are saying 100% of Wilder fans don't know what they are talking about. I wouldn't have expected that from you. Saying Wilder has no chance is not very savvy.
Re: Both Joshua and Povetkin had ambiguous perfomances
How can Wilder win outside of a puncher's chance, which just about every HW has because of the nature of the division. He has no chance. Joshua has the better jab, better fundamentals, and better overall experience.
Re: Both Joshua and Povetkin had ambiguous perfomances
Well, I'm sure we can agree that we'd like to see it already!Mexi-Box wrote: ↑02 Apr 2018, 19:39How can Wilder win outside of a puncher's chance, which just about every HW has because of the nature of the division. He has no chance. Joshua has the better jab, better fundamentals, and better overall experience.
Re: Both Joshua and Povetkin had ambiguous perfomances
Wilder has faster hands, and more of a killer instinct I'd say, but I agree with you that Joshua has the better fundamentals, has beaten better fighters overall, and DEFINITELY has the better jab. No contest at all in the jab department.Mexi-Box wrote: ↑02 Apr 2018, 19:39How can Wilder win outside of a puncher's chance, which just about every HW has because of the nature of the division. He has no chance. Joshua has the better jab, better fundamentals, and better overall experience.
Fact is though. It's a fight where just like Wilder/Ortiz. Either fighter can KO the other at any given moment. So I wouldn't be surprised if both were very cautious just waiting to land the bomb, and when it lands for either guy...look out.
-
Ilya Muromets
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4243
- Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02
Re: Both Joshua and Povetkin had ambiguous perfomances
It was a union problem. The Amalgamated Intergalactic Iron Workers went on strike. Sorry if there will be any inconvenience when we blast away the space debris - what you call the earth and the moon - in the path of the new highway. We'll try to keep noise and space pollution to a minimum, and we will attempt to evacuate the higher life forms - insects and trees - prior to demolition.
Re: Both Joshua and Povetkin had ambiguous perfomances
Okidokie...someone left their spaceships double parked by Saturn's rings...LOL!x2x wrote: ↑02 Apr 2018, 21:02It was a union problem. The Amalgamated Intergalactic Iron Workers went on strike. Sorry if there will be any inconvenience when we blast away the space debris - what you call the earth and the moon - in the path of the new highway. We'll try to keep noise and space pollution to a minimum, and we will attempt to evacuate the higher life forms - insects and trees - prior to demolition.
Re: Both Joshua and Povetkin had ambiguous perfomances
I'm a massive fan of Anthony Joshua but anyone who believes Wilder has no chance of beating him is deluding himself.
I think the emergent calculating, eliminate-the-risks, Joshua that we saw against Parker starts favourite in my view. He is without doubt the better boxer, but then so were most of Wilder's recent victims. It takes a brave man or a fool to write him off. I'll put you down as a brave man. I always like to look on the bright side
Povetkin was a hell of a challenge for anyone but that was then and this is now. He is shorter in height and reach, older, slower and without the youthful reflexes of Joe Parker but look at the difficulty Parker had in closing the range without getting picked off on the way in. Sasha walked into a bomb from Price while trying to get close. AJ hits with similar power, the difference is he won't let the Vityaz man off the hook once he's landed the big one.
I have great respect for Povetkin but he's just too small and too old to be a threat to Joshua now. Not so Wilder.
-
Ilya Muromets
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4243
- Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02
Re: Both Joshua and Povetkin had ambiguous perfomances
Oh that's OK, Oogeeboogee. Most of them are only parked there temporarily because we put no parking signs around earth's orbit due to the highway construction that will start soon, and the space meter maids will start ticketing tomorrow, tow trucks too. Let me know if anybody is blocking your spaceport driveway.oogiebe wrote: ↑02 Apr 2018, 21:04Okidokie...someone left their spaceships double parked by Saturn's rings...LOL!x2x wrote: ↑02 Apr 2018, 21:02It was a union problem. The Amalgamated Intergalactic Iron Workers went on strike. Sorry if there will be any inconvenience when we blast away the space debris - what you call the earth and the moon - in the path of the new highway. We'll try to keep noise and space pollution to a minimum, and we will attempt to evacuate the higher life forms - insects and trees - prior to demolition.
Re: Both Joshua and Povetkin had ambiguous perfomances
Damn AIIW troublemakers! Fire the lot of them I say.