Joseph Parker was robbed

[Grailer]

Power punches are scored more highly in professional boxing .

Parker won round 2,3,5,6,9,11

That makes fight a DRAW

The ref was clearly not up to the job which caused Parker to not beable to work on inside.

[Enlightened-One]

Yet another silly post.

I'm beginning to feel disappointed about the quality, integrity and factual accuracy of the posts being submitted to this forum.

[gilgamesh]

Referee did a sh*t job, and robbed the fans of a more interesting fight.

Joseph Parker did the best he could, and lost the fight.

116-112 Joshua

Could've been 117-111 Joshua.

Wasn't a robbery. Wasn't even really close.

You're just either a huge Joseph Parker fan or a huge Anthony Joshua hater who can't stop harping on this as if you're actually fooling anybody.

[gilgamesh]

Yet another silly post.

I'm beginning to feel disappointed about the quality, integrity and factual accuracy of the posts being submitted to this forum.

Posts are essentially opinions. Factual accuracy isn't necessarily a prerequisite for posting on a forum, but generally you get eviscerated by the people who DO know what they're talking about when you post stupid sh*t.

[Grailer]

Then explain the compubox stats? Or better yet tell me what rounds you think Joshua won and we can discuss why I think he lost those rounds?

[Kalan]

Power punches are scored more highly in professional boxing .

Parker won round 2,3,5,6,9,11

That makes fight a DRAW

The ref was clearly not up to the job which caused Parker to not beable to work on inside.

Joshua CLEARLY won the fight.... EVERY person with a brain and good vision KNOWS he did... EVEN Parker KNEW he was beaten... He said "Joshua was the better man on the night.. Back to the drawing board." .... If it was close he would have complained about the scoring... He didn't... He knew damned well Joshua got the better of him.

The referee often jumped in when Joshua was scoring big... He was a terrible referee but he didn't decide the winner.

[oogiebe]

Um...Parker lost...get over it already. Punchstats don't tell the whole story!!! Hellooooooooooo!!!!!!! Cut and slice and dice it all you want...the winner and still....(God! WTF)

[gilgamesh]

Then explain the compubox stats?

Joshua landed more punches. Explain how you think that means he lost.

[Grailer]

What rounds do you think Joshua won?

[gilgamesh]

Then explain the compubox stats? Or better yet tell me what rounds you think Joshua won and we can discuss why I think he lost those rounds?

Joshua won Round 1 thru 4, and 9 thru 12.

Parker won rounds 5 thru 8.

The early rounds when all else was even Joshua's heavier jab got him those rounds. His right hands to the body often were the hardest punches landed in otherwise dull rounds.

Parker didn't do enough to win dude. There's nothing to discuss.

[Grailer]

Then explain the compubox stats?

Joshua landed more punches. Explain how you think that means he lost.

The rounds Parker lost Joshua was very decisive and threw a lot more punches in those rounds. But boxing is about winning rounds .

[gilgamesh]

Then explain the compubox stats?

Joshua landed more punches. Explain how you think that means he lost.

The rounds Parker lost Joshua was very decisive and threw a lot more punches in those rounds. But boxing is about winning rounds .

Right...and Parker didn't win as many as Joshua did.

It's really not that complicated.

[jamamb]

a compubox stat is juzt another guys opinion anyway

[oogiebe]

Then explain the compubox stats?

Joshua landed more punches. Explain how you think that means he lost.

The rounds Parker lost Joshua was very decisive and threw a lot more punches in those rounds. But boxing is about winning rounds .

Grailer - if everyone here agreed, what do we do then? March on um...er...send letters to ...um...er...It was close...ref sucked...Joshua won. C"mon man!

[gilgamesh]

I think we can all agree that the ref sucked. That's about all we can all agree on apparently as it pertains to this fight. Everyone is getting real worked up about this fight for some reason and reading way more into it than was there in a lot of ways.

[Grailer]

Parker clearly won round 2

Joshua 8 punches landed
Parker 9 punches landed

Parker landed 5 power shots
Joshua landed 3

[Grailer]

a compubox stat is juzt another guys opinion anyway

A measured stat. If you think it’s wrong then watch fight in slow motion and count .

[oogiebe]

OK...now what?

[jamamb]

its juzt another guy watching and giving opinion on what landed and they do it in real time, except when they accept commissions from danny green to do it after the fact i guess

[oogiebe]

its juzt another guy watching and giving opinion on what landed and they do it in real time, except when they accept commissions from danny green to do it after the fact i guess

I'm done here...unsubscribing.

[Grailer]

OK...now what?

Joshua won round 1, 4 , 7,8, 12

What now? Well now I know the true results of the
Fight and can argue about who wins a rematch lol

[Enlightened-One]

.

[oogiebe]

OK...now what?

Joshua won round 1, 4 , 7,8, 12

What now? Well now I know the true results of the
Fight and can argue about who wins a rematch lol

LMFAO!! Ok...I'll drink to that!

[Grailer]

I’m not asking for the judges decision to be over turned i’m Just highlighting the fact that they were wrong .

[gilgamesh]

Yet another silly post.

I'm beginning to feel disappointed about the quality, integrity and factual accuracy of the posts being submitted to this forum.

Posts are essentially opinions. Factual accuracy isn't necessarily a prerequisite for posting on a forum, but generally you get eviscerated by the people who DO know what they're talking about when you post stupid sh*t.

Yeah you can challenge me, even if you're a forum moderator.

Why don't you review the last ten posts I've submitted in the context of the claims being made by other forum members when they claim they're articulating facts rather than opinions.

I generally challenge other forum members claims that they believe to be fact rather than opinion.

If you think I'm wrong, then issue me with a permanent ban. If you carefully review these posts and then appreciate the fact that my claims are accurate, then be honest and say so.

Either issue me with a permanent ban or admit that my behaviour isn't so unreasonable.

You're one of the few people I respect that frequent this forum, but if you cannot perform an objective analysis and appreciate what has actually occurred, then you may as well issue me with a permanent ban.

Last night, I received a tonne of abuse from a fellow forum member that I've admired for quite a long time, simply because they issued me with a challenge to illustrate the fact that Deontay Wilder contravened one of the WBC's rules.

So when I detailed it, this middle aged emotionally disturbed individual unleashed a horrendous amount of abuse on me.

What did I do wrong in that situation?

If you're a forum moderator, then do your job.

If my behaviour really is morally reprehensible, then issue me with a permanent ban, otherwise consider the possibility that you need to be more vigilant in the role you're meant to perform.

I'm happy to receive a permanent ban if you can prove that I've behaved in an unreasonable manner.

It's up to you whether you want me to continue contributing to this forum.

I am absolutely mystified as to the nature of this post or why it has such a defensive nature from you. You seem to think something is going on that isn't...at least from my end. I'm honestly confused by this post, and what it is you think I meant with mine. I thought it made perfect sense myself, but apparently you thought I said I f*cked your mother or something.