The end of Pacquiao being a KO machine probably coincides with his move to welter in 2009 rather than anything to do with a rise in his opponent's talent level.apollo creed wrote: ↑08 Apr 2018, 09:54Aging is a big factor too. Golovkin's speed, relentless and reflexes aren't the same when he was 29-31 y/o.caldo2025 wrote: ↑08 Apr 2018, 02:11Good points Senior. I agree that theories of GGGs decline do have a lot to do about a huge step up in class. But they said same about Manny when he was knocking everyone out then never had another ko while sprinkling in a few losses.SenorPipino wrote: ↑07 Apr 2018, 10:55
For the millionth time, Golovkin's not fading. It's just that the opposition has gotten 200% better since the days when he feasted on Monroe, Adama, Stevens, Wade, Rubio.
Canelo, Jacobs and even the undersized Brook are light years above those names in talent.
It's a guarantee that Golovkin will again look like a dominant destroyer when he drops it down a few notches against Spike O'Sullivan.
Time is P4P champ every year.
He was simply banging on bigger, stronger bodies that were difficult to knock out.
And it's not like Pac didn't fight talented fighters at lower weights who he was unable to KO.
Marquez, Morales (the first time around) and Barrera in the rematch.
By time he lost to Bradley (dubiously but still not an overwhelming performance on his part) Pacquiao was probably starting to slide a bit.
As for Golovkin, it's probable that there's a slight dropoff in his skills, compared to 5 years ago or so.
But I suspect that if he was fighting the same opponents today, he would still dismiss them easily.
His performance decline is undoubtedly related more to the higher level of opposition rather than advancing years.
That should be clear against Spike.