Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Spence vs. Brook 2 Winner and How?

Errol Spence Stoppage
31
76%
Errol Spence Decision
3
7%
Draw
0
No votes
Kell Brook Decision
6
15%
Kell Brook Stoppage
1
2%
 
Total votes: 41

Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7265
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by Oiky »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 08 Apr 2018, 12:10
Oiky wrote: 08 Apr 2018, 12:06 Spence beats Brook again
and again, and again, and again. :zzz:

Brook will just never beat Spence, at any weight anytime.
Make you right
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10150
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by samwbr »

Kell looking like he's living life well there.
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5157
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by TheLeprechaun »

samwbr wrote: 08 Apr 2018, 12:31 Kell looking like he's living life well there.
He looked a lot bigger than Spence didn't he
Bigdogsnose
Middleweight
Posts: 1468
Joined: 02 Dec 2013, 08:36

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by Bigdogsnose »

least it shows he's got the bit in his teeth and wants to avenge the loss. Probably bigger money fights he could chase. Whilst I think there careers are probably on different trajectories, it was a good fight in which brook showed, if nothing else, he has the class.
lurkyshaka
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 569
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 13:19

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by lurkyshaka »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 08 Apr 2018, 08:02
Switch hitter wrote: 08 Apr 2018, 04:33 Errol Spence knows he was lucky getting Brook to drag himself down to 147........ 154 would be a totally different Brook. It would be a good fight though but don't think it will happen
Brook is just not a better boxer than Spence.. Spence cuts just as much weight as Brook. Like Gil said, it will be same outcome.
Brook was winning the fight until the eye went. Spence hadn't proven to be the better fighter until that injury occurred against the run of play. Add to this that Brook is much more powerful at 54 and will naturally have improved stamina and endurance.....he has an excellent chance at avenging the defeat 'if' Spence will take the rematch, which I think is doubtful.
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1172
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by rio »

Why would Spence take the rematch? Makes no sense. Hes the 147 champ so why would he move up a weight to fight for no title against a guy he already knocked out? As for brook being more powerful at the weight it didnt seem to help him vs GGG who said he had no power. Brook should be begging for the Charlo or Hurd fight. I bet his next fight is another crap one which goes in line with 95% of his career.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11181
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by Ezzard »

Brook is far better than Peterson and light years ahead of the names being talked about for the next opponent...

After Spence-Crawford (which is the real fight at 147)...I'd rather see this fight than any other.
ALI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 14:10

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by ALI »

Brook needs to give Spence a reason to want to take the rematch at 154. He needs to win a title then call him up to challenge for it, otherwise its not going to happen.
Terminator666
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1662
Joined: 06 Nov 2007, 10:18

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by Terminator666 »

I wouldn’t want to see it - spence is different class
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 102316
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

lurkyshaka wrote: 09 Apr 2018, 12:08
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 08 Apr 2018, 08:02
Switch hitter wrote: 08 Apr 2018, 04:33 Errol Spence knows he was lucky getting Brook to drag himself down to 147........ 154 would be a totally different Brook. It would be a good fight though but don't think it will happen
Brook is just not a better boxer than Spence.. Spence cuts just as much weight as Brook. Like Gil said, it will be same outcome.
Brook was winning the fight until the eye went. Spence hadn't proven to be the better fighter until that injury occurred against the run of play. Add to this that Brook is much more powerful at 54 and will naturally have improved stamina and endurance.....he has an excellent chance at avenging the defeat 'if' Spence will take the rematch, which I think is doubtful.
Like I said it's a 12 round fight.. Also, his eye didn't 'just go'.. Spence punched his eye out of its socket..

It did't just magically get damaged..
lurkyshaka
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 569
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 13:19

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by lurkyshaka »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 09 Apr 2018, 16:17
lurkyshaka wrote: 09 Apr 2018, 12:08
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 08 Apr 2018, 08:02

Brook is just not a better boxer than Spence.. Spence cuts just as much weight as Brook. Like Gil said, it will be same outcome.
Brook was winning the fight until the eye went. Spence hadn't proven to be the better fighter until that injury occurred against the run of play. Add to this that Brook is much more powerful at 54 and will naturally have improved stamina and endurance.....he has an excellent chance at avenging the defeat 'if' Spence will take the rematch, which I think is doubtful.
Like I said it's a 12 round fight.. Also, his eye didn't 'just go'.. Spence punched his eye out of its socket..

It did't just magically get damaged..
It is a 12 round fight, but Brook had showed no signs of weakening until the eye injury occurred against the run of play and that's the point. It occurred when Brook was in control and it is a freak type of injury. A rematch would tell us who is the better fighter because at this point there are more questions than answers.
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5157
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by TheLeprechaun »

Terminator666 wrote: 09 Apr 2018, 15:59 I wouldn’t want to see it - spence is different class

Agreed. Some comical posts in this thread.
fightfan95
Welterweight
Posts: 883
Joined: 30 Nov 2015, 09:17

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by fightfan95 »

I would really like Brook's chances at LMW - would love to see it happen
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 102316
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

lurkyshaka wrote: 10 Apr 2018, 03:28
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 09 Apr 2018, 16:17
lurkyshaka wrote: 09 Apr 2018, 12:08

Brook was winning the fight until the eye went. Spence hadn't proven to be the better fighter until that injury occurred against the run of play. Add to this that Brook is much more powerful at 54 and will naturally have improved stamina and endurance.....he has an excellent chance at avenging the defeat 'if' Spence will take the rematch, which I think is doubtful.
Like I said it's a 12 round fight.. Also, his eye didn't 'just go'.. Spence punched his eye out of its socket..

It did't just magically get damaged..
It is a 12 round fight, but Brook had showed no signs of weakening until the eye injury occurred against the run of play and that's the point. It occurred when Brook was in control and it is a freak type of injury. A rematch would tell us who is the better fighter because at this point there are more questions than answers.
What you're missing is, who caused the eye injury? Apart from accidental clash of heads, who causes a cut over a boxers eye? Its his opponent.. while Brook was doing well at the start, Spence was also working on Brook.. Broke him down mentally and physically..

It's like the GGG-Brook fight. A lot of people saying Brook started well, and he did.. but it was GGG's power and punch that broke his socket.. it's part of boxing..

And eye injury isn't accidental.
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by TheGman »

Repeat of the first but this time brook would have no excuses
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by ewenhay »

I'd watch a rematch at 154 for a title no problem. It would be competitive in my opinion though I'd back Spence to win on points. The trajectories at this point work in Spence's favour.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by Stuarty »

I wouldn't mind seeing it again if Brook managed to prove himself and beat a Hurd, Lara, Charlo etc... I can't see that happening though tbh. Also there's some massive fights for Spence at 147 so I can't see him moving up anytime soon and Brook has already been talking about retirement.....
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by ewenhay »

Stuarty wrote: 10 Apr 2018, 14:37 I wouldn't mind seeing it again if Brook managed to prove himself and beat a Hurd, Lara, Charlo etc... I can't see that happening though tbh. Also there's some massive fights for Spence at 147 so I can't see him moving up anytime soon and Brook has already been talking about retirement.....
I agree. If Brook picks up a belt at 154 then the rematch makes a lot of sense.

Without a belt Spence has better options
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by Stuarty »

ewenhay wrote: 10 Apr 2018, 14:40
Stuarty wrote: 10 Apr 2018, 14:37 I wouldn't mind seeing it again if Brook managed to prove himself and beat a Hurd, Lara, Charlo etc... I can't see that happening though tbh. Also there's some massive fights for Spence at 147 so I can't see him moving up anytime soon and Brook has already been talking about retirement.....
I agree. If Brook picks up a belt at 154 then the rematch makes a lot of sense.

Without a belt Spence has better options
He'll probably be looking to fight the Ali v Smith winner. That's the easiest route to a strap as things stand. Obviously the one he really wants is Khan. That could end up going tits up if Amir fights anyone with a pulse after LoGreco.
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by ewenhay »

Stuarty wrote: 10 Apr 2018, 14:43
ewenhay wrote: 10 Apr 2018, 14:40
Stuarty wrote: 10 Apr 2018, 14:37 I wouldn't mind seeing it again if Brook managed to prove himself and beat a Hurd, Lara, Charlo etc... I can't see that happening though tbh. Also there's some massive fights for Spence at 147 so I can't see him moving up anytime soon and Brook has already been talking about retirement.....
I agree. If Brook picks up a belt at 154 then the rematch makes a lot of sense.

Without a belt Spence has better options
He'll probably be looking to fight the Ali v Smith winner. That's the easiest route to a strap as things stand. Obviously the one he really wants is Khan. That could end up going tits up if Amir fights anyone with a pulse after LoGreco.
Aye good shout. Very winnable even at this stage in Brook's career.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by Counter-puncher »

Switch hitter wrote: 08 Apr 2018, 08:48
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 08 Apr 2018, 08:08
Old Jack J wrote: 08 Apr 2018, 08:04 I thought Brook started the first fight very well. Looked comfortable. Then as Brook started to gas, Spence took charge of the fight.

If Brook can last 12 rounds at 154 then I think it would be a very competitive and exciting fight.

Even if that's the case I reckon Spence might just edge it on points. I'd like to see it again for sure.
Anyone can start a fight well.. it's how you finish it.. Brook and Spence both started the fight well, but Brook was doing the better work at the start. If he gasses or tires out, that's his fault. It's a 12 round fight. I like to think Spence was slowly breaking Brook down..
He gassed because he killed himself making the weight..... 154 different fight
Location: Sheffield.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by Counter-puncher »

ElJefe wrote: 08 Apr 2018, 10:35
forcefraser wrote: 08 Apr 2018, 08:12 spence's bodywork in that fight was excellent
People don't mention this enough. Brook might have slowed down because of the weight cut, but he also slowed down because Spence was ripping him with body shots from the start. Spence knew it was going to be a long, hard fight so he went downstairs early, he got the game plan right.
I make you right :TU:
Shirow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1718
Joined: 29 Nov 2003, 11:15

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by Shirow »

TheLeprechaun wrote: 10 Apr 2018, 03:37
Terminator666 wrote: 09 Apr 2018, 15:59 I wouldn’t want to see it - spence is different class

Agreed. Some comical posts in this thread.
I tend to agree. If Kell hadn't been battered by GGG maybe he wouldn't have also been battered by Spence but both batterings happened and he is surely on the inevitable decline.

If he truly believes he can get revenge at 154 he should move up before Errol and take a title off Hurd or Charlo then call him out then.

I can't see that working for him out but I'd be happy to watch.
lurkyshaka
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 569
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 13:19

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by lurkyshaka »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 10 Apr 2018, 05:23
lurkyshaka wrote: 10 Apr 2018, 03:28
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 09 Apr 2018, 16:17

Like I said it's a 12 round fight.. Also, his eye didn't 'just go'.. Spence punched his eye out of its socket..

It did't just magically get damaged..
It is a 12 round fight, but Brook had showed no signs of weakening until the eye injury occurred against the run of play and that's the point. It occurred when Brook was in control and it is a freak type of injury. A rematch would tell us who is the better fighter because at this point there are more questions than answers.
What you're missing is, who caused the eye injury? Apart from accidental clash of heads, who causes a cut over a boxers eye? Its his opponent.. while Brook was doing well at the start, Spence was also working on Brook.. Broke him down mentally and physically..

It's like the GGG-Brook fight. A lot of people saying Brook started well, and he did.. but it was GGG's power and punch that broke his socket.. it's part of boxing..

And eye injury isn't accidental.
Obviously I understand a punch caused the injury, but it came against the run of play.

There was no 'breaking down' process at work UNTIL that injury occurred. Brook had looked comfortable until that point. If Spence had been in control when the injury happened then it would be fair to say he was on the way anyway.....but he simply wasn't. Hence why a rematch at 54 is very interesting.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Errol Spence vs. Kell Brook 2

Post by stujones »

Let's see brook in a proper fight before passing judgement. When is the last time won a tough gritty fight.. probably in winning the title. His successful title defences were poor....as was rabencko (Not poor as a comeback opponent but not a good yard stick to show how much he has left at elite level).

People say Brook killed himself to make 147, maybe but he STILL didn't rule out Khan at 147 even after beating rabchenko.

I am a fan and he's shown great balls in the past. But there is a time when a fighter loses it....Rabencko wasn't a big enough test to show he still has it . Looking great against an over the hill sub world class fighter is a mile away from Spence.
Post Reply