Sullivan's Mustache

Post Reply
APerno
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1654
Joined: 20 Jul 2016, 03:38

Sullivan's Mustache

Post by APerno »

Does anyone know if Sullivan shaved his famed mustache off for all his fights or just the bare knuckle ones?
I have read that one of the reasons Sullivan hated fighting bare knuckle was being grabbed. I wonder if he didn't want his mustache being grabbed, or if he shaved it off for all his fights.

Image

Image
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Sullivan's Mustache

Post by HomicideHenry »

He always shaved his mustache off when defending the title, especially when it was bareknuckle rules. He even shaved his hair depending on the rules.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Sullivan's Mustache

Post by Kalan »

Those 2 boys look like club fighters... Out of shape... No hardness... No musculature... No size or strength...

No wonder Corbett took over... Gentleman Jim had no size or strength -- but at least he had great conditioning.

I always wondered about handlebar mustaches... In a street fight somebody could literally pull part of your face off .... and not a part you'd want to lose... You wouldn't want a dust up with John Fury if you were sporting one of those... Too attractive a target... If a man would gouge your eye out, he'd go after those handles. :o :oo
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Sullivan's Mustache

Post by BitPlayer »

Kalan wrote: 15 Apr 2018, 01:00 Those 2 boys look like club fighters... Out of shape... No hardness... No musculature... No size or strength...

No wonder Corbett took over... Gentleman Jim had no size or strength -- but at least he had great conditioning.

I always wondered about handlebar mustaches... In a street fight somebody could literally pull part of your face off .... and not a part you'd want to lose... You wouldn't want a dust up with John Fury if you were sporting one of those... Too attractive a target... If a man would gouge your eye out, he'd go after those handles. :o :oo
Image
Image
Caractacus
Middleweight
Posts: 18593
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: Sullivan's Mustache

Post by Caractacus »

BitPlayer wrote: 15 Apr 2018, 03:33
Kalan wrote: 15 Apr 2018, 01:00 Those 2 boys look like club fighters... Out of shape... No hardness... No musculature... No size or strength...

No wonder Corbett took over... Gentleman Jim had no size or strength -- but at least he had great conditioning.

I always wondered about handlebar mustaches... In a street fight somebody could literally pull part of your face off .... and not a part you'd want to lose... You wouldn't want a dust up with John Fury if you were sporting one of those... Too attractive a target... If a man would gouge your eye out, he'd go after those handles. :o :oo
Image
No hardness ?
just look at that big assed artery or whatever around John L. Sullivan's left fore-arm.
That indicates power in his forearm especially with a twisting motion.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15181
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Sullivan's Mustache

Post by Ambling Alp II »

He looks pretty good that one one. That's a famous picture of Sullivan that you see in a lot of boxing books.

Sometimes Sullivan was in shape and sometimes he wasn't. Interesting that they both look better in the top picture than in the lower one. (I believe that the lower picture was not "discovered until a few years ago.) Amazing that Sullivan and Kilrain fought for so long.
Caractacus
Middleweight
Posts: 18593
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: Sullivan's Mustache

Post by Caractacus »

I bet if someone was to tint his skin tone darker in that photograph other then Sullivan's natural "Alabaster" skin tone,
they would think twice to say that.
Caractacus
Middleweight
Posts: 18593
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: Sullivan's Mustache

Post by Caractacus »

btw how many photgraphs exist of John L. Sullivan (with his shirt off)
that were taken from the original negatives of the photographic images ?
Detail always gets lost in reproductions of reproductions of photos.
Caractacus
Middleweight
Posts: 18593
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: Sullivan's Mustache

Post by Caractacus »

Cropping the hair short for a title fight at least goes back to 1795 when Daniel Mendoza lost his English HW title
primarly due to his opponent "Gentleman" John Jackson grabbing Mendoza's long curly black locks
with one hand while punching him in the face with the other.

Sullivan dfinately shaved his mustache off for the fights with Paddy Ryan in 1886 and Charlie Mitchel in 1888.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Sullivan's Mustache

Post by Kalan »

Caractacus wrote: 16 Apr 2018, 15:26
No hardness ? just look at that big assed artery or whatever around John L. Sullivan's left fore-arm.
That indicates power in his forearm especially with a twisting motion.
Well of course... Anybody's arms look twice as big and impressive if they're folding them like that... But John L's still look terribly anemic compared to modern Heavyweights like Joshua or the K Bros..

I was referring to a photo above that one -- where Kilrain (on your left) is loading a right-hand from his hip, that Sullivan is looking to defend against.. Sullivan looks fat, soft, and with no definition on his arms... Kilrain looks weak as Hell.
Caractacus
Middleweight
Posts: 18593
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: Sullivan's Mustache

Post by Caractacus »

APerno wrote: 14 Apr 2018, 16:14 Does anyone know if Sullivan shaved his famed mustache off for all his fights or just the bare knuckle ones?
I have read that one of the reasons Sullivan hated fighting bare knuckle was being grabbed. I wonder if he didn't want his mustache being grabbed, or if he shaved it off for all his fights.


Image
Doesn't he look a bit like Jim J. Jeffries there ?
Ingemar Johannson also looked a bit like "the Boiler-Maker" when he was younger anyway.
Perhaps due to to raiding Viking ancestry eons earlier.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Sullivan's Mustache

Post by Kalan »

Caractacus wrote: 16 Apr 2018, 15:26
No hardness ? just look at that big assed artery or whatever around John L. Sullivan's left fore-arm.
That indicates power in his forearm especially with a twisting motion.
Well of course... Anybody's arms look twice as big and impressive if they're folding them like that... But John L's still looks terribly anemic compared to modern Heavyweights like Joshua or the K Bros..

I was referring to the photo above -- where Kilrain (on your left) is loading a right-hand from his hip, that Sullivan is looking to defend against.. Sullivan looks fat, soft, and with no definition on his arms... Kilrain looks weak as Hell.
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Sullivan's Mustache

Post by BitPlayer »

Caractacus wrote: 16 Apr 2018, 15:58 Cropping the hair short for a title fight at least goes back to 1795 when Daniel Mendoza lost his English HW title
primarly due to his opponent "Gentleman" John Jackson grabbing Mendoza's long curly black locks
with one hand while punching him in the face with the other.

Sullivan dfinately shaved his mustache off for the fights with Paddy Ryan in 1886 and Charlie Mitchel in 1888.
I think it was standard before then, Mendoza just didn't really follow it.

I've heard it suggest that what Jackson did to him wasn't really allowed and that he got away with it because of the politics, well antisemitism, at the time. It wasn't based on particularly strong evidence though.
APerno
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1654
Joined: 20 Jul 2016, 03:38

Re: Sullivan's Mustache

Post by APerno »

Image
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32790
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Sullivan's Mustache

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Caractacus wrote: 16 Apr 2018, 15:58 Cropping the hair short for a title fight at least goes back to 1795 when Daniel Mendoza lost his English HW title
primarly due to his opponent "Gentleman" John Jackson grabbing Mendoza's long curly black locks
with one hand while punching him in the face with the other.

Sullivan dfinately shaved his mustache off for the fights with Paddy Ryan in 1886 and Charlie Mitchel in 1888.
I guess the ‘Gentleman’ nickname was deliberately ironic :o
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: Sullivan's Mustache

Post by ewenhay »

Looking forward to the 'Tommy Morrison's Mullet' thread!
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Sullivan's Mustache

Post by BitPlayer »

Boxerbeetle wrote: 17 Apr 2018, 12:37
Caractacus wrote: 16 Apr 2018, 15:58 Cropping the hair short for a title fight at least goes back to 1795 when Daniel Mendoza lost his English HW title
primarly due to his opponent "Gentleman" John Jackson grabbing Mendoza's long curly black locks
with one hand while punching him in the face with the other.

Sullivan dfinately shaved his mustache off for the fights with Paddy Ryan in 1886 and Charlie Mitchel in 1888.
I guess the ‘Gentleman’ nickname was deliberately ironic :o
No, I think it was because he actually somehow got himself a very high social status despite not being born into it. He only had I think 3 pro fights do, but he was a boxing instructor etc.
Post Reply