Hair samples are supposedly an unreliable barometer to gauge whether an athlete is "clean" or not.oogiebe wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 18:52Interesting...so WADA doesn't believe in false positives? or am I reading this incorrectly?Enlightened-One wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 18:50Have you read the WADA code?boxing_rocks wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 18:32
There is no proof, because Canelo didn't provide a hair sample. If he was really clean, he would have done that and not get suspended at all. Him not being enrolled in WBC Clean Boxing program is another sign of cheating. Changes in his body too.
Any testing results obtained from hair, nails, oral fluid or other biological material shall not be used to counter Adverse Analytical Findings or Atypical Findings...
CANELO back in september ?
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: CANELO back in september ?
Re: CANELO back in september ?
Enlightened-One wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 18:53It's counter intuitive to forensics with regards to poisoning and drug testing. Not saying you're not quoting correctly, just that the code is rather questionable. Hair provides a 'timeline', deposits in the hair as it grows. Hmmmm...Hair in other sports and on the job testing is one of the most 'reliable' tests.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: CANELO back in september ?
Hair samples often produce varying quantative results for people with different hair color and thickness, but they are helpful to determine timeline of consumption, i.e. if it was random exposure or consistent consumption.
Re: CANELO back in september ?
That's my point, so why (if you know) would it not be admissible, or am I missing something (again).boxing_rocks wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 19:05 Hair samples often produce varying quantative results for people with different hair color and thickness, but they are helpful to determine timeline of consumption, i.e. if it was random exposure or consistent consumption.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: CANELO back in september ?
WADA is all about formalities. Variable results is a red flag for them. However, a hair test proving that it was a one time use (which likely wasn't the case) would be a good argument at NSAC hearing and even more importantly, in the eyes of the boxing community. Enrolling in Donaire like voluntary testing would be too.oogiebe wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 19:07That's my point, so why (if you know) would it not be admissible, or am I missing something (again).boxing_rocks wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 19:05 Hair samples often produce varying quantative results for people with different hair color and thickness, but they are helpful to determine timeline of consumption, i.e. if it was random exposure or consistent consumption.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: CANELO back in september ?
The WADA code and its rules weren't just written for boxing.
If they deem the results of testing hair samples as being unreliable, then we shouldn't expect any athlete to undergo further testing that is redundant in nature, since it won't achieve anything.
The rules are clear on this.
We cannot accuse Canelo of trying to conceal his guilt, simply because he hasn't submitted a hair sample for testing, because it's utterly pointless.
If they deem the results of testing hair samples as being unreliable, then we shouldn't expect any athlete to undergo further testing that is redundant in nature, since it won't achieve anything.
The rules are clear on this.
We cannot accuse Canelo of trying to conceal his guilt, simply because he hasn't submitted a hair sample for testing, because it's utterly pointless.
Re: CANELO back in september ?
Why pointless if he claims he ate tainted meat, a hair test would (if he's lying) prove he was taking the PED for a longer period of time.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 19:18 The WADA code and its rules weren't just written for boxing.
If they deem the results of testing hair samples as being unreliable, then we shouldn't expect any athlete to undergo further testing that is redundant in nature, since it won't achieve anything.
The rules are clear on this.
We cannot accuse Canelo of trying to conceal his guilt, simply because he hasn't submitted a hair sample for testing, because it's utterly pointless.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: CANELO back in september ?
When a fighter agrees to undergo VADA-administered PED testing, he also has to understand and abide by their rules, which are ultimately dictated by the WADA code.oogiebe wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 19:19Why pointless if he claims he ate tainted meat, a hair test would (if he's lying) prove he was taking the PED for a longer period of time.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 19:18 The WADA code and its rules weren't just written for boxing.
If they deem the results of testing hair samples as being unreliable, then we shouldn't expect any athlete to undergo further testing that is redundant in nature, since it won't achieve anything.
The rules are clear on this.
We cannot accuse Canelo of trying to conceal his guilt, simply because he hasn't submitted a hair sample for testing, because it's utterly pointless.
The WADA code clearly states that hair samples cannot be used to counter adverse analytical findings.
Canelo was tested according to that protocol, which he signed-up for.
Simply put: hair samples are inadmissible.
Re: CANELO back in september ?
okEnlightened-One wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 19:25When a fighter agrees to undergo VADA-administered PED testing, he also has to understand and abide by their rules, which are ultimately dictated by the WADA code.oogiebe wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 19:19Why pointless if he claims he ate tainted meat, a hair test would (if he's lying) prove he was taking the PED for a longer period of time.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 19:18 The WADA code and its rules weren't just written for boxing.
If they deem the results of testing hair samples as being unreliable, then we shouldn't expect any athlete to undergo further testing that is redundant in nature, since it won't achieve anything.
The rules are clear on this.
We cannot accuse Canelo of trying to conceal his guilt, simply because he hasn't submitted a hair sample for testing, because it's utterly pointless.
The WADA code clearly states that hair samples cannot be used to counter adverse analytical findings.
Canelo was tested according to that protocol, which he signed-up for.
Simply put: hair samples are inadmissible.
Re: CANELO back in september ?
IF CANELO IS SERIOUS ABOUT THIS SITUATION, BOXING AND HIS INTEGRITY...HE NEEDS TO ENROL IN THE VADA CLEAN BOXING PROGRAM!
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: CANELO back in september ?
Mauricio Sulaiman claims that Canelo has been enrolled in the Clean Boxing Program for "many years."
Also, the WBC and Canelo patched up their differences a couple of months ago, with Alvarez finally agreeing to compete for their belt against Golovkin. It would have been a mandatory requirement.
The VADA website even confirms that he's part of their program.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: CANELO back in september ?
Yep, if he was clean, he would've enrolled in all year around voluntary random testing with VADA to prove that it was one time use of tainted meat.
Re: CANELO back in september ?
THANK YOU FOR THE INFORMATION. IS THE PROGRAM YOU DETAIL THE SAME PROGRAM THAT ADMINISTERS RANDOM DRUG TESTING OUTSIDE OF COMPETITION?Enlightened-One wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 19:55Mauricio Sulaiman claims that Canelo has been enrolled in the Clean Boxing Program for "many years."
Also, the WBC and Canelo patched up their differences a couple of months ago, with Alvarez finally agreeing to compete for their belt against Golovkin. It would have been a mandatory requirement.
The VADA website even confirms that he's part of their program.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: CANELO back in september ?
No, he wasn't, and Sulaiman carefully avoided answering Montero's questions regarding reasons of that. The tests he failed we're his first tests ever in Mexico.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 19:55Mauricio Sulaiman claims that Canelo has been enrolled in the Clean Boxing Program for "many years."
Also, the WBC and Canelo patched up their differences a couple of months ago, with Alvarez finally agreeing to compete for their belt against Golovkin. It would have been a mandatory requirement.
The VADA website even confirms that he's part of their program.
Also, there is a big difference between underfunded WBC program and voluntary Donaire style testing.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: CANELO back in september ?
I'm not supporting Sulaiman's claims, merely repeating them.boxing_rocks wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 20:02No, he wasn't, and Sulaiman carefully avoided answering Montero's questions regarding reasons of that. The tests he failed we're his first tests ever in Mexico.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 19:55Mauricio Sulaiman claims that Canelo has been enrolled in the Clean Boxing Program for "many years."
Also, the WBC and Canelo patched up their differences a couple of months ago, with Alvarez finally agreeing to compete for their belt against Golovkin. It would have been a mandatory requirement.
The VADA website even confirms that he's part of their program.
Also, there is a big difference between underfunded WBC program and voluntary Donaire style testing.
However, it's impossible to deny that the VADA website clearly lists Canelo as being enrolled in their program.
Google it if you don't believe me.
Re: CANELO back in september ?
Hair tests are also quite easy to get past. I remember here in Australia a footballer had all types of recreational drug use issues and rumours. He took a short brake from footy but when he came back the AFL told him to play he had to pass a hair test. He had mid length hair for his entire career but before the hair test could be taken he had number 2 haircut all over meaning the hair sample could only be taken from the point he assumed he would test clean from rather than the previous months of hair growth that he normally had. Canelo normally has short hair so it would probably be a pretty useless test,Enlightened-One wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 19:25When a fighter agrees to undergo VADA-administered PED testing, he also has to understand and abide by their rules, which are ultimately dictated by the WADA code.oogiebe wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 19:19Why pointless if he claims he ate tainted meat, a hair test would (if he's lying) prove he was taking the PED for a longer period of time.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 19:18 The WADA code and its rules weren't just written for boxing.
If they deem the results of testing hair samples as being unreliable, then we shouldn't expect any athlete to undergo further testing that is redundant in nature, since it won't achieve anything.
The rules are clear on this.
We cannot accuse Canelo of trying to conceal his guilt, simply because he hasn't submitted a hair sample for testing, because it's utterly pointless.
The WADA code clearly states that hair samples cannot be used to counter adverse analytical findings.
Canelo was tested according to that protocol, which he signed-up for.
Simply put: hair samples are inadmissible.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: CANELO back in september ?
Nice rumor. They are testing a follicle though, so cutting hair will not affect results.p4p1 wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 20:25 Hair tests are also quite easy to get past. I remember here in Australia a footballer had all types of recreational drug use issues and rumours. He took a short brake from footy but when he came back the AFL told him to play he had to pass a hair test. He had mid length hair for his entire career but before the hair test could be taken he had number 2 haircut all over meaning the hair sample could only be taken from the point he assumed he would test clean from rather than the previous months of hair growth that he normally had. Canelo normally has short hair so it would probably be a pretty useless test,
Re: CANELO back in september ?
So I'm right then. Thank you for clarifying.boxing_rocks wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 20:41Nice rumor. They are testing a follicle though, so cutting hair will not affect results.p4p1 wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 20:25 Hair tests are also quite easy to get past. I remember here in Australia a footballer had all types of recreational drug use issues and rumours. He took a short brake from footy but when he came back the AFL told him to play he had to pass a hair test. He had mid length hair for his entire career but before the hair test could be taken he had number 2 haircut all over meaning the hair sample could only be taken from the point he assumed he would test clean from rather than the previous months of hair growth that he normally had. Canelo normally has short hair so it would probably be a pretty useless test,
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: CANELO back in september ?
https://www.BS.com/vada-canelo ... um=twitter
VADA: Canelo Not Currently Enrolled in Testing Program
Re: CANELO back in september ?
WHY AM I NOT SURPRISED??!!!!!!!!boxing_rocks wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 21:50 https://www.BS.com/vada-canelo ... um=twitter
VADA: Canelo Not Currently Enrolled in Testing Program
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9404
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: CANELO back in september ?
More reason to dislike this bastardlazboy wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 22:04WHY AM I NOT SURPRISED??!!!!!!!!boxing_rocks wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 21:50 https://www.BS.com/vada-canelo ... um=twitter
VADA: Canelo Not Currently Enrolled in Testing Program
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100743
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: CANELO back in september ?
VADA welcomes Saul “Canelo” Alvarez back to our program as he prepares for his 5/5/18 rematch against Gennady Golovkin.lazboy wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 22:04WHY AM I NOT SURPRISED??!!!!!!!!boxing_rocks wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 21:50 https://www.BS.com/vada-canelo ... um=twitter
VADA: Canelo Not Currently Enrolled in Testing Program
This is what VADA's official website states (click on the above hyperlink to access it). Also, use the "Way Back Machine" website to confirm when this was originally posted (i.e. before the article you quoted was published).
The out-of-competition drug testing was definitely administered by the Voluntary Anti-Doping Agency (VADA) and Dr. Margaret Goodman informed all interested parties of Canelo's infraction using the following letter:

And this resulted in Golden Boy releasing the following statement:
"As part of the voluntary testing program that Canelo Alvarez insisted on ahead of his May 5 fight, one of his results came back positive for trace levels of clenbuterol…”
Mauricio Sulaiman also claims that Canelo has been enrolled in the Clean Boxing Program for "many years."
It seems that Dr. Margaret Goodman's claim is either wrong or VADA's own "official" website, Mauricio Sulaiman, GBP and even her own fũckîng words that she wrote down are incorrect.
Re: CANELO back in september ?
Teper was on everthing under the sun, not just clen. Stupidly leneant.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑18 Apr 2018, 15:45 There's a few people upset about Canelo only receiving a six month's suspension, but isn't that the typical punishment for Clenbuterol (i.e. Lucas Browne and Erkan Teper)?
I'm not an expert in this subject matter, so I'm genuinely curious. I am not asking a rhetorical question.