Fighters not signed up to VADA

Post Reply
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13424
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Fighters not signed up to VADA

Post by jameswilson »

https://www.BS.com/wbc-reveal- ... da--127362


A lot of recognisable names in there including people who have failed tests already.
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Fighters not signed up to VADA

Post by Boxing Prospect »

And...some fighters who have actually retired!
Deleted_Scenes
Middleweight
Posts: 633
Joined: 29 Oct 2013, 17:02

Re: Fighters not signed up to VADA

Post by Deleted_Scenes »

Not signed up to VADA doesn't necessarily mean not tested.

I can't speak for other countries, but any championship level boxer holding a BBBoC license is subject to year round testing by UKAD by default. UKAD are generally pretty strict too, and violations come with suspensions measured in years, not just a token few months.

Recent happenings suggest VADA testing might not actually be worth that much, if you're a fighter who makes people rich.
chinarich
Middleweight
Posts: 6883
Joined: 29 Dec 2013, 13:20

Re: Fighters not signed up to VADA

Post by chinarich »

I believe that Canelo isn’t signed up, I know he doesn’t care for the WBC but you would think after testing positive his team would want to go out of their way to prove that he’s a clean athlete...
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23121
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Fighters not signed up to VADA

Post by mickey1975 »

Deleted_Scenes wrote: 23 Apr 2018, 13:14 Not signed up to VADA doesn't necessarily mean not tested.

I can't speak for other countries, but any championship level boxer holding a BBBoC license is subject to year round testing by UKAD by default. UKAD are generally pretty strict too, and violations come with suspensions measured in years, not just a token few months.

Recent happenings suggest VADA testing might not actually be worth that much, if you're a fighter who makes people rich.
Recent happenings suggest UKAD are just as bad....
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: Fighters not signed up to VADA

Post by ewenhay »

UKAD are a shambles.
Deleted_Scenes
Middleweight
Posts: 633
Joined: 29 Oct 2013, 17:02

Re: Fighters not signed up to VADA

Post by Deleted_Scenes »

mickey1975 wrote: 23 Apr 2018, 14:13
Deleted_Scenes wrote: 23 Apr 2018, 13:14 Not signed up to VADA doesn't necessarily mean not tested.

I can't speak for other countries, but any championship level boxer holding a BBBoC license is subject to year round testing by UKAD by default. UKAD are generally pretty strict too, and violations come with suspensions measured in years, not just a token few months.

Recent happenings suggest VADA testing might not actually be worth that much, if you're a fighter who makes people rich.
Recent happenings suggest UKAD are just as bad....
They dragged out one case. There's blame on both sides for that too. The Furys weren't exactly cooperative.

In terms of testing, they actually go out and do some (compare the frequency of Joshua's testing, compared with anyone signed up to WBC/CBP - big difference).

Also, unlike VADA/USADA, UKAD have the power to issue suspensions directly, so they have no inclination to show leniency where there's money involved (they receive the same fee whether they're testing Anthony Joshua or testing me).

VADA/USADA simply test (sometimes), then issue a report. Beyond that, they have zero power. It's up to the commissions or alphabet groups to issue sanctions, and we all know they think of their bank balance first and foremost...

The whole PED testing system is counterproductive in America.
Post Reply