Cleveland Williams' best punch
Cleveland Williams' best punch
When I looked at the Ring Magazine 100 Greatest Puncher it said that Cleveland "Big Cat" Williams' best punch was his right hand, but the announcers in the film of his fight said his best punch was his left hook who was right?
-
BrocktonBlockbuster49
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4900
- Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32
-
bill.lockhart
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 249
- Joined: 01 Nov 2005, 11:40
Big Cat
He is a hard guy to rate. He was unable to get many fights against the best fighters of his era, but when he did, was unable to win. He lost to Liston twice, drew with Machen, won & lost to Terrell, lost to Ali & to Chuvalo late in his career. A win over Ernie Terrell was the hi-lite of his career. I think he was a step below the best of his era, but always had that punchers chance. How would he have done against Patterson, Johannson, Folley, Cooper or Roy Harris? Williams- Harris would have been a natural for the state title.
-
The Great John L
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4351
- Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37
Re: Big Cat
Pretty good summary. I think he was a very good HW, but seems to be over rated by many on this forum. He just didn’t have the resume.bill.lockhart wrote:He is a hard guy to rate. He was unable to get many fights against the best fighters of his era, but when he did, was unable to win. He lost to Liston twice, drew with Machen, won & lost to Terrell, lost to Ali & to Chuvalo late in his career. A win over Ernie Terrell was the hi-lite of his career. I think he was a step below the best of his era, but always had that punchers chance. How would he have done against Patterson, Johannson, Folley, Cooper or Roy Harris? Williams- Harris would have been a natural for the state title.
-
BrocktonBlockbuster49
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4900
- Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32
Re: Big Cat
The Great John L wrote:Pretty good summary. I think he was a very good HW, but seems to be over rated by many on this forum. He just didn’t have the resume.bill.lockhart wrote:He is a hard guy to rate. He was unable to get many fights against the best fighters of his era, but when he did, was unable to win. He lost to Liston twice, drew with Machen, won & lost to Terrell, lost to Ali & to Chuvalo late in his career. A win over Ernie Terrell was the hi-lite of his career. I think he was a step below the best of his era, but always had that punchers chance. How would he have done against Patterson, Johannson, Folley, Cooper or Roy Harris? Williams- Harris would have been a natural for the state title.
disagree,
the reason he didnt have the resume is because he was highly avoided by the top contenders in his prime. no one wanted to fight him. kinda the same with elmer ray during the mid 1940s.
had more top contenders fought cleveland williams, he would have a much better resume. its not his fault they avoided him, he was too dangerous
Re: Big Cat
I'm probably one guilty of over rating him. I think he beats all of the guys you mention: Patterson, Johannson, Folley, Cooper or Roy Harris.bill.lockhart wrote:He is a hard guy to rate. He was unable to get many fights against the best fighters of his era, but when he did, was unable to win. He lost to Liston twice, drew with Machen, won & lost to Terrell, lost to Ali & to Chuvalo late in his career. A win over Ernie Terrell was the hi-lite of his career. I think he was a step below the best of his era, but always had that punchers chance. How would he have done against Patterson, Johannson, Folley, Cooper or Roy Harris? Williams- Harris would have been a natural for the state title.
I don't see it as bad that he lost to Liston.