AJKlitschfury wrote: ↑07 May 2018, 11:23
And with succes, he got asdfjkl banned for example.
Badhusker is like cancer on this forum, he seems like another nice fella, which makes the forum growing, but then he tries to kill and ban as many people as possible, with succes every once in a while. He's like the Deontay Wilder of boxing, destroying the sport purely for selfish economic reasons. The only thing he dares to proof is fighting an absolute no hoper like Arreola all the way till he's in his prime and then suddenly all the people that make boxing big have to listen to him purely and only because he wants them to. Like the WBC and AJ and so on are Wilder his bitches that he can rape whenever he likes to.
Badhusker wrote: ↑06 May 2018, 17:47
Why don't British and Irish boxing fans stay in their own section of this site that was created for them?
Most are an irritating bunch of idiots.
If nothing changes here, I will be among the many that go elsewhere.
You can't talk to them on Joshua wilder topics.
I'm sure you can. Most acknowledge Deontay has the edge in power for a start but it's clear as day that AJ has a better resume at this point (not that it always means a lot).
If other nations backed there fighters the way we do the sport would be far, far healthier. We can be a bit Ott in rating our lads at times but we often have such a decent domestic scene it can gloss over flaws in a fighter.
Why thank you for your kind words. I have found cause to disagree with all three on various occasions but each has from time to time posted something which I thought was illuminating, perceptive, insightful.
Maybe you have too, I'm afraid I don't recall, sorry.
Badhusker wrote: ↑06 May 2018, 17:47
Why don't British and Irish boxing fans stay in their own section of this site that was created for them?
Most are an irritating bunch of idiots.
If nothing changes here, I will be among the many that go elsewhere.
You can't talk to them on Joshua wilder topics.
I'm sure you can. Most acknowledge Deontay has the edge in power for a start but it's clear as day that AJ has a better resume at this point (not that it always means a lot).
If other nations backed there fighters the way we do the sport would be far, far healthier. We can be a bit Ott in rating our lads at times but we often have such a decent domestic scene it can gloss over flaws in a fighter.
The Brit forum can be a joke at times. Loads of them seriously saying Kell brook would win a rematch with spence recently
Why thank you for your kind words. I have found cause to disagree with all three on various occasions but each has from time to time posted something which I thought was illuminating, perceptive, insightful.
Maybe you have too, I'm afraid I don't recall, sorry.
To each their own man, I just find the two I highlighted more often than not, just have some unfounded/racist/nationalistic views.
JMac wrote: ↑07 May 2018, 07:56
Damn Brits tried to take over the world. They must gives these countries money or why else would they stay in the Commonwealth?
We stay in the commonwealth for ease of travel between member countries, a common alliegence, free trade, the use of an independent legal option (the British High Court), defensive and strategic planning, and to fawn over royal babies.
I'm sure you can. Most acknowledge Deontay has the edge in power for a start but it's clear as day that AJ has a better resume at this point (not that it always means a lot).
If other nations backed there fighters the way we do the sport would be far, far healthier. We can be a bit Ott in rating our lads at times but we often have such a decent domestic scene it can gloss over flaws in a fighter.
The Brit forum can be a joke at times. Loads of them seriously saying Kell brook would win a rematch with spence recently :lol:
At 154 I presume. Whilst I don't agree it's not exactly out of the realms of possibility is it?
I'm sure you can. Most acknowledge Deontay has the edge in power for a start but it's clear as day that AJ has a better resume at this point (not that it always means a lot).
If other nations backed there fighters the way we do the sport would be far, far healthier. We can be a bit Ott in rating our lads at times but we often have such a decent domestic scene it can gloss over flaws in a fighter.
The Brit forum can be a joke at times. Loads of them seriously saying Kell brook would win a rematch with spence recently
At 154 I presume. Whilst I don't agree it's not exactly out of the realms of possibility is it?
TheLeprechaun wrote: ↑07 May 2018, 15:12 The Brit forum can be a joke at times. Loads of them seriously saying Kell brook would win a rematch with spence recently
I bet you can't even name three forum members that made that claim.
If you can't substantiate your claim then shut the fûck up!
TheLeprechaun wrote: ↑07 May 2018, 15:12 The Brit forum can be a joke at times. Loads of them seriously saying Kell brook would win a rematch with spence recently
I bet you can't even name three forum members that made that claim.
If you can't substantiate your claim then shut the fûck up!
TheLeprechaun wrote: ↑07 May 2018, 15:12 The Brit forum can be a joke at times. Loads of them seriously saying Kell brook would win a rematch with spence recently
I bet you can't even name three forum members that made that claim.
If you can't substantiate your claim then shut the fûck up!
