Vasiliy Lomachenko-Jorge Linares was a much more competitive, compelling fight than Lomachenko’s domination of Guillermo Rigondeaux, but it didn’t draw greater ratings.
Nielsen Media Research numbers released Tuesday revealed ESPN’s two-bout broadcast Saturday night, which featured Lomachenko’s 10th-round technical knockout of Linares, drew an average audience of 1,024,000 viewers. The peak viewership for the Lomachenko-Linares battle wasn’t available as of Tuesday afternoon.
Lomachenko’s previous performance, a technical knockout of the previously unbeaten Rigondeaux on December 9 in The Theater at Madison Square Garden, drew a higher average rating for ESPN (1,730,000).
Top Rank’s doubleheader Saturday night began at 8 p.m. ET/5 p.m. PT – right in the middle of prime time on the East Coast, but earlier than usual for boxing broadcasts. It began with welterweight prospect Carlos Adames’ 10-round, unanimous-decision victory over Alejandro Barrera.
While lower than Lomachenko’s last fight, the average rating for Lomachenko-Linares was higher than all but one of Top Rank’s first five ESPN offerings in 2018.
The only Top Rank/ESPN broadcast that lured a higher average audience in 2018 was the card headlined by Oscar Valdez’s victory over Scott Quigg in a WBO featherweight championship match March 10. That telecast from StubHub Center in Carson, California, was watched by an average audience of 1,100,000.
Lomachenko-Linares also ranked No. 3 among all shows on cable television Saturday night, sports and non-sports, in viewers ages 18-49, a coveted demographic for advertisers.
Lomachenko-Linares Show Snags Average Audience of 1,024,000
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 101397
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 101397
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Lomachenko-Linares Show Snags Average Audience of 1,024,000
Not what I expected TBH.
Maybe it was the start time?
Who knows? I take it as it's an average of the telecast, the Loma-Linares fight must have been viewed by a few more 100k's?
Maybe it was the start time?
Who knows? I take it as it's an average of the telecast, the Loma-Linares fight must have been viewed by a few more 100k's?
-
SenorPipino
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 6055
- Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40
Re: Lomachenko-Linares Show Snags Average Audience of 1,024,000
Linares was more dangerous but Rigo had a much bigger reputation than the lightweight champ.
The 2 time gold medalists angle helped to make Loma vs Rigo seem historically special even if it was a physical mismatch.
The early start time may have effected west coast viewership but it was still a good time slot for most of the nation.
I guess it was horrendous for the UK but you guys must be used to that by now.
The 2 time gold medalists angle helped to make Loma vs Rigo seem historically special even if it was a physical mismatch.
The early start time may have effected west coast viewership but it was still a good time slot for most of the nation.
I guess it was horrendous for the UK but you guys must be used to that by now.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 101397
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Lomachenko-Linares Show Snags Average Audience of 1,024,000
It started after 2am in the UK. Much better than 4am lolSenorPipino wrote: ↑15 May 2018, 19:24 Linares was more dangerous but Rigo had a much bigger reputation than the lightweight champ.
The 2 time gold medalists angle helped to make Loma vs Rigo seem historically special even if it was a physical mismatch.
The early start time may have effected west coast viewership but it was still a good time slot for most of the nation.
I guess it was horrendous for the UK but you guys must be used to that by now.