PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16521
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by Nightmare Roy »

I don't blame Whyte for pulling out, why would he accept 25% of the purse? It's not like Pulev is a champion.
Mexi-Box
Welterweight
Posts: 3963
Joined: 24 Jan 2016, 16:19

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by Mexi-Box »

I knew Whyte wouldn't do it. Pulev is much too dangerous for 25%, though. That's ridiculous. It's pretty much a guaranteed loss.
gregregegg
Lightweight
Posts: 9154
Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by gregregegg »

ill admit i havent seen much of Pulev but from what i can see his last good win was over 5 years ago (i dont consider a SD over chissora a good win). also his last fight was over a year ago and he went the distance with an aging kevin johnson that had lost 5 of his last 7 fights (admitadly against good guys). i find it hard to belive that 37 year old pulev is going to preform well next time he is up against a decent fighter.
chinarich
Middleweight
Posts: 6870
Joined: 29 Dec 2013, 13:20

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by chinarich »

Mexi-Box wrote: 08 Jun 2018, 01:29 I knew Whyte wouldn't do it. Pulev is much too dangerous for 25%, though. That's ridiculous. It's pretty much a guaranteed loss.
Exactly, fighting at home in an eliminator bout, Whyte would have to have stopped him to win...
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by punchoutsb »

gregregegg wrote: 08 Jun 2018, 07:26 ill admit i havent seen much of Pulev but from what i can see his last good win was over 5 years ago (i dont consider a SD over chissora a good win). also his last fight was over a year ago and he went the distance with an aging kevin johnson that had lost 5 of his last 7 fights (admitadly against good guys). i find it hard to belive that 37 year old pulev is going to preform well next time he is up against a decent fighter.
He dominated Chisora, the split was bs. On the other hand, Chisora was likely screwed against Whyte. Pulev would beat Dillian up.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by Enlightened-One »

Whyte earns shît loads more facing a better opponent like Parker in the UK than Pulev for relative pennies in Bulgaria.

It's actually moronic to suggest otherwise! :lol:

Eddie Hearn is never going to sacrifice promotional control over the TV rights unless it's financially and politically beneficial to do so.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101377
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

punchoutsb wrote: 08 Jun 2018, 10:40
gregregegg wrote: 08 Jun 2018, 07:26 ill admit i havent seen much of Pulev but from what i can see his last good win was over 5 years ago (i dont consider a SD over chissora a good win). also his last fight was over a year ago and he went the distance with an aging kevin johnson that had lost 5 of his last 7 fights (admitadly against good guys). i find it hard to belive that 37 year old pulev is going to preform well next time he is up against a decent fighter.
He dominated Chisora, the split was bs. On the other hand, Chisora was likely screwed against Whyte. Pulev would beat Dillian up.
:TU: :TU: :TU:
Mexi-Box
Welterweight
Posts: 3963
Joined: 24 Jan 2016, 16:19

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by Mexi-Box »

Enlightened-One wrote: 08 Jun 2018, 15:12 Whyte earns shît loads more facing a better opponent like Parker in the UK than Pulev for relative pennies in Bulgaria.

It's actually moronic to suggest otherwise! :lol:

Eddie Hearn is never going to sacrifice promotional control over the TV rights unless it's financially and politically beneficial to do so.
We don't know that. Pulev only fought a better version of Klitschko than Joshua did and lost. No one knows Pulev's ceiling yet because he doesn't fight much. The fact that he dominated Chisora who Whyte struggled with is telling, though.
marvelous marv
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1184
Joined: 16 Apr 2004, 12:41

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by marvelous marv »

Pulev should fight Ortiz. Winner gets to be mandatory for two sanctioning bodies.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by Enlightened-One »

Mexi-Box wrote: 08 Jun 2018, 20:22
Enlightened-One wrote: 08 Jun 2018, 15:12 Whyte earns shît loads more facing a better opponent like Parker in the UK than Pulev for relative pennies in Bulgaria.

It's actually moronic to suggest otherwise! :lol:

Eddie Hearn is never going to sacrifice promotional control over the TV rights unless it's financially and politically beneficial to do so.
We don't know that. Pulev only fought a better version of Klitschko than Joshua did and lost. No one knows Pulev's ceiling yet because he doesn't fight much. The fact that he dominated Chisora who Whyte struggled with is telling, though.
Whyte would have only been paid £280K to face Pulev in Bulgaria during September. The Brit was only entitled to 25% of the winning purse split total, with Kubrat receiving the remaining 75%.

Instead, he'll receive a far better purse facing a more accomplished fighter on his home turf. Dillian's decision was a no-brainer!

Joseph Parker is rated above Kubrat Pulev by both The RING and also by ESPN. The Kiwi is also a former world champion.

Eddie Hearn won't allow any of his fighters to compete on rival promoters fight cards if it isn't beneficial for him to do so. This sort of practice is commonplace.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by jamamb »

god, so many ppl have gone on about pulev only winning a split vs chisora in a way that makes it obvious they didnt watch it

pulev won 8-10 rounds, the card for chisora was awful. that said pulevs stagnated badly
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by lillywhite14 »

Pulev clearly beat Del Boy but he didn’t look great in the process. Chisora is an up and down fighter. That night he was poor

Parker is probably better than Pulev and Whyt is making more money too. No brainer.

Whoever wins that will be first in line for a Joshua voluntary I suspect
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by mullenman »

Great move by whyte. No point in fighting Pulev for small cash
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by candyslim »

punchoutsb wrote: 08 Jun 2018, 10:40
gregregegg wrote: 08 Jun 2018, 07:26 ill admit i havent seen much of Pulev but from what i can see his last good win was over 5 years ago (i dont consider a SD over chissora a good win). also his last fight was over a year ago and he went the distance with an aging kevin johnson that had lost 5 of his last 7 fights (admitadly against good guys). i find it hard to belive that 37 year old pulev is going to preform well next time he is up against a decent fighter.
He dominated Chisora, the split was bs. On the other hand, Chisora was likely screwed against Whyte. Pulev would beat Dillian up.
Chisora is two fighters, Jekyl and Hyde. One is a poorly motivated pussycat who went through the motions against Pulev and Kabayel. The other is a totally psyched up, motivated, determined not to be beaten by the hated DW, Dereck Chisora. You cannot compare his performance against Whyte and Pulev (or Kabayel) without doing Whyte a massive injustice.

Still, you just keep putting him down and he'll keep fighting people that most others would do only if dictated by one of the governing bodies.

And who has Pulev beaten recently to make you think he's still got it?
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by jamamb »

thngs wth that though how do you tell 'bad' del from neutralized by a good jab del

for me though rght now id choose whyte over pulev...but pulev certanly had the superor performance vs del
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by candyslim »

I don't deny Pulev has a first rate jab but anyone can see the difference between good and bad Del is primarily motivation, or lack of it. If he'd felt about Pulev the way he felt about Whyte, I think Pulev might have wilted under the intensity, and if he didn't (wilt) he'd have fought out of his skin to get the decision.
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by punchoutsb »

candyslim wrote: 09 Jun 2018, 07:41
punchoutsb wrote: 08 Jun 2018, 10:40
gregregegg wrote: 08 Jun 2018, 07:26 ill admit i havent seen much of Pulev but from what i can see his last good win was over 5 years ago (i dont consider a SD over chissora a good win). also his last fight was over a year ago and he went the distance with an aging kevin johnson that had lost 5 of his last 7 fights (admitadly against good guys). i find it hard to belive that 37 year old pulev is going to preform well next time he is up against a decent fighter.
He dominated Chisora, the split was bs. On the other hand, Chisora was likely screwed against Whyte. Pulev would beat Dillian up.
Chisora is two fighters, Jekyl and Hyde. One is a poorly motivated pussycat who went through the motions against Pulev and Kabayel. The other is a totally psyched up, motivated, determined not to be beaten by the hated DW, Dereck Chisora. You cannot compare his performance against Whyte and Pulev (or Kabayel) without doing Whyte a massive injustice.

Still, you just keep putting him down and he'll keep fighting people that most others would do only if dictated by one of the governing bodies.

And who has Pulev beaten recently to make you think he's still got it?
I have never accepted the excuses from Chisora apologists, and they've been throwing them out for years. Chisora is a gate keeper, no matter how "psyched up, motivated, determined" he is. He has never won a meaningful fight in his career, he loses to every high class fighter he faces. The closest he has come to winning a big fight was against a one armed Helenius and Dillian Whyte. Chisora was never a pussycat, he was a fighter that lacked ability at the highest level. Pulev (or Kabayel, or Haye, or Fury, or Klitschko, or Fury again...) shut him down because they were better, not because he was unmotivated.
Mexi-Box
Welterweight
Posts: 3963
Joined: 24 Jan 2016, 16:19

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by Mexi-Box »

candyslim wrote: 09 Jun 2018, 16:00 I don't deny Pulev has a first rate jab but anyone can see the difference between good and bad Del is primarily motivation, or lack of it. If he'd felt about Pulev the way he felt about Whyte, I think Pulev might have wilted under the intensity, and if he didn't (wilt) he'd have fought out of his skin to get the decision.
This motivated Chisora garbage has been going on since his first loss to Fury. They said Chisora was depressed and unmotivated. In the rematch, he got dominated.
Mexi-Box
Welterweight
Posts: 3963
Joined: 24 Jan 2016, 16:19

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by Mexi-Box »

Enlightened-One wrote: 09 Jun 2018, 04:27
Mexi-Box wrote: 08 Jun 2018, 20:22
Enlightened-One wrote: 08 Jun 2018, 15:12 Whyte earns shît loads more facing a better opponent like Parker in the UK than Pulev for relative pennies in Bulgaria.

It's actually moronic to suggest otherwise! :lol:

Eddie Hearn is never going to sacrifice promotional control over the TV rights unless it's financially and politically beneficial to do so.
We don't know that. Pulev only fought a better version of Klitschko than Joshua did and lost. No one knows Pulev's ceiling yet because he doesn't fight much. The fact that he dominated Chisora who Whyte struggled with is telling, though.
Whyte would have only been paid £280K to face Pulev in Bulgaria during September. The Brit was only entitled to 25% of the winning purse split total, with Kubrat receiving the remaining 75%.

Instead, he'll receive a far better purse facing a more accomplished fighter on his home turf. Dillian's decision was a no-brainer!

Joseph Parker is rated above Kubrat Pulev by both The RING and also by ESPN. The Kiwi is also a former world champion.

Eddie Hearn won't allow any of his fighters to compete on rival promoters fight cards if it isn't beneficial for him to do so. This sort of practice is commonplace.
Not saying it's a no-brainer to not take a guaranteed loss for no money, but we really don't know how good Pulev is at the moment. He's not had the fights he should.

Pulev vs. Parker is 50-50. Parker won't KO him, and I find it hard to see Parker outboxing a lethal jabber like Pulev. Spurting out rankings here is far off from how good either man is.
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by punchoutsb »

Mexi-Box wrote: 09 Jun 2018, 19:01
candyslim wrote: 09 Jun 2018, 16:00 I don't deny Pulev has a first rate jab but anyone can see the difference between good and bad Del is primarily motivation, or lack of it. If he'd felt about Pulev the way he felt about Whyte, I think Pulev might have wilted under the intensity, and if he didn't (wilt) he'd have fought out of his skin to get the decision.
This motivated Chisora garbage has been going on since his first loss to Fury. They said Chisora was depressed and unmotivated. In the rematch, he got dominated.
Motivated Chisora makes me laugh every time. He was totally motivated against Andras Csomor, then lost his motivation (and yet was somehow in much better shape) against Pulev, and then regained his motivation (along with about 20 pounds of fat) against Drazan Janjanin. Definitely has nothing to do with the level of opponents, just his motivation.

:lol: :lol: :lol:
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by candyslim »

Oh do me a favour. Chisora didn't need to be motivated to beat the likes of Csomor, he's a very limited fighter. No disgrace in being totally bamboozled and flumoxed by Tyson Fury, that even happened to Klitschko. David Haye also outclassed him and that would have happened whatever Dereck's state of mind.

I'm not saying Chisora was ever good enough to be a serious contender, but if you people can't see the polar difference in his intensity between his performance against Whyte compared to that against Pulev or Kabayel, then I'm not going to change your mind whatever I say.

As for Pulev, he's been a genuine contender but he's 37 now and it's been years since he had to prove himself worthy of a top six rating. I suspect he's in decline, but it's hard to be sure when he hasn't recently fought anyone (still) good enough to test his ability. If Whyte had fought him we'd know but I can't blame him for pulling out. Pulev has had years in which to fight quality opposition but has chosen to fight ageing journeymen instead.
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by punchoutsb »

candyslim wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 03:31 Oh do me a favour. Chisora didn't need to be motivated to beat the likes of Csomor, he's a very limited fighter. No disgrace in being totally bamboozled and flumoxed by Tyson Fury, that even happened to Klitschko. David Haye also outclassed him and that would have happened whatever Dereck's state of mind.

I'm not saying Chisora was ever good enough to be a serious contender, but if you people can't see the polar difference in his intensity between his performance against Whyte compared to that against Pulev or Kabayel, then I'm not going to change your mind whatever I say.

As for Pulev, he's been a genuine contender but he's 37 now and it's been years since he had to prove himself worthy of a top six rating. I suspect he's in decline, but it's hard to be sure when he hasn't recently fought anyone (still) good enough to test his ability. If Whyte had fought him we'd know but I can't blame him for pulling out. Pulev has had years in which to fight quality opposition but has chosen to fight ageing journeymen instead.
Pulev shut him down. Got nothing to do with intensity.
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by candyslim »

I guess we'll have to agree to differ.
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: PULEV comments on WHYTE & EDDIE

Post by candyslim »

punchoutsb wrote: 09 Jun 2018, 18:14
candyslim wrote: 09 Jun 2018, 07:41
punchoutsb wrote: 08 Jun 2018, 10:40

He dominated Chisora, the split was bs. On the other hand, Chisora was likely screwed against Whyte. Pulev would beat Dillian up.
Chisora is two fighters, Jekyl and Hyde. One is a poorly motivated pussycat who went through the motions against Pulev and Kabayel. The other is a totally psyched up, motivated, determined not to be beaten by the hated DW, Dereck Chisora. You cannot compare his performance against Whyte and Pulev (or Kabayel) without doing Whyte a massive injustice.

Still, you just keep putting him down and he'll keep fighting people that most others would do only if dictated by one of the governing bodies.

And who has Pulev beaten recently to make you think he's still got it?
I have never accepted the excuses from Chisora apologists, and they've been throwing them out for years. Chisora is a gate keeper, no matter how "psyched up, motivated, determined" he is. He has never won a meaningful fight in his career, he loses to every high class fighter he faces. The closest he has come to winning a big fight was against a one armed Helenius and Dillian Whyte. Chisora was never a pussycat, he was a fighter that lacked ability at the highest level. Pulev (or Kabayel, or Haye, or Fury, or Klitschko, or Fury again...) shut him down because they were better, not because he was unmotivated.
I think Dereck has proved my point that he is a Jekyl and Hyde character and there is no comparison between the fired up, highly motivated, let-me-kill-him, Dereck Chisora faced by Whyte and Takam, and the just-going-through-the-motions Dereck Chisora faced by Pulev and Kabayel.

I don't like to say "I told you so" No fu'kit, yes I do. :D
Post Reply