Salvador Sanchez vs. Hector Camacho

Post Reply
APerno
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1654
Joined: 20 Jul 2016, 03:38

Salvador Sanchez vs. Hector Camacho

Post by APerno »

August 7th, 1983 Salvador Sanchez vs. Hector Camacho 12 Rounds for the vacant WBC Super Featherweight Title.

IMO a pick'em if there ever was one; would have been nice.

Not that Rafael Limon wasn't deserving but barring tragedy I suspect it would have been Sanchez's fight; it was Camacho's 'coming out party.'
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13879
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Salvador Sanchez vs. Hector Camacho

Post by DrDuke »

Sanchez, possibly by stoppage.
APerno
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1654
Joined: 20 Jul 2016, 03:38

Re: Salvador Sanchez vs. Hector Camacho

Post by APerno »

DrDuke wrote: 08 Jun 2018, 03:54 Sanchez, possibly by stoppage.
I agree I felt at this time Sanchez probably had too much experience for the newbie Camacho; although a stoppage over 12 rounds wouldn't seem likely to me, Camacho did over the years prove he could take a good punch and could be very difficult to hit cleanly twice in a row.

At Super FW in '83 Sanchez by UD
At LW in '86 Camacho by by UD
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Salvador Sanchez vs. Hector Camacho

Post by BoxBuzz »

I'd lean to Sanchez, but wasn't Camacho a bigger guy?

At any rate I do agree that Camacho could take a punch...but once he really did prove he could absorb a big punch.....it seems he also decided he wanted as little of it as possible from that point on. He was an aggressor that turned into a dancer.
APerno
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1654
Joined: 20 Jul 2016, 03:38

Re: Salvador Sanchez vs. Hector Camacho

Post by APerno »

Yea, someone else suggested that Rosario ruined him as a fighter. I always felt, had the Rosario fight been 15 rounds Rosario may have stopped Camacho.

P.S. Camacho was the bigger guy that is why I feel if they had met three years later at 135 Camacho might have prevailed, but at 130 in 1983, I guess I would go with Sanchez. But a tough fight either way.
Nile4000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7190
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 15:21

Re: Salvador Sanchez vs. Hector Camacho

Post by Nile4000 »

Camacho would win a close Ud. As great as Salvador was, he would be facing a different animal that he has never dealt with. I think the same thing would happened if he faced Kenty, Davis jr, or even Pazienza.
APerno
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1654
Joined: 20 Jul 2016, 03:38

Re: Salvador Sanchez vs. Hector Camacho

Post by APerno »

Nile4000 wrote: 08 Jun 2018, 21:33 Camacho would win a close Ud. As great as Salvador was, he would be facing a different animal that he has never dealt with. I think the same thing would happened if he faced Kenty, Davis jr, or even Pazienza.
Pazienza was definitely a bigger man, possibly too big for Sanchez; at the end I wondered if he wasn't juicing.
Nile4000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7190
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 15:21

Re: Salvador Sanchez vs. Hector Camacho

Post by Nile4000 »

APerno wrote: 08 Jun 2018, 21:42
Nile4000 wrote: 08 Jun 2018, 21:33 Camacho would win a close Ud. As great as Salvador was, he would be facing a different animal that he has never dealt with. I think the same thing would happened if he faced Kenty, Davis jr, or even Pazienza.
Pazienza was definitely a bigger man, possibly too big for Sanchez; at the end I wondered if he wasn't juicing.
You know, Im thinking he probably was, maybe one of the first, but it opens a lot of cans of worms somewhere.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Salvador Sanchez vs. Hector Camacho

Post by BoxBuzz »

Thinking about the Pazienza statement.....the guy fit the descriptor of "roid rage" on several occasions as well.

I suppose where there's smoke, you could find the fire. It's thought provoking for sure.
Post Reply