I agree Haye-Bellew should not be on the schedule, but for some reason people want the fight on the schedule.AJKlitschfury wrote: ↑05 May 2018, 04:35And what about two unranked fighters like Haye and Bellew? Who are both ranked lower as Duhaupas and Miller?HyacinthusTurnipseed wrote: ↑02 May 2018, 08:07It didn't qualify as a Big Fight for JCS. Certainly it was a noteworthy, even intriguing fight but a maybe top 5 vs a maybe top 15 matchup isn't really BIG, as such. Start including fights like that and the floodgates open up for the likes of Abraham-Nielson, Tete-Narvaez, even Skeete-Lajarraga or Menayothin's every fight to be included.
PTBF 2018 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Re: PTBF 2018 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Re: PTBF 2018 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Would've put Jacobs-Sulecki on before Miller-Duhaupas.
In other news, Kameda stopped Wonjongkam in the 2nd round.. but it was classified as an "exhibition".
In other news, Kameda stopped Wonjongkam in the 2nd round.. but it was classified as an "exhibition".
Re: PTBF 2018 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Aug-4: Kovalev vs. Eleider Álvarez 
Re: PTBF 2018 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Can we predict a draw? I can't split Stevenson and Jack.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 101277
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: PTBF 2018 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
I think Selby vs. Warrington would have been a good addition to this. I don't know about anyone else, but I can't split them.
I mean Russel vs. Diaz is on here. Why not?
I mean Russel vs. Diaz is on here. Why not?
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32719
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: PTBF 2018 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Thank fvck it wasn’tRuthless-RKO wrote: ↑18 May 2018, 18:07 I think Selby vs. Warrington would have been a good addition to this. I don't know about anyone else, but I can't split them.
I mean Russel vs. Diaz is on here. Why not?
Re: PTBF 2018 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
High scoring week! I went LSC wide and Crawford KO 9 and came in expecting to see myself jump several places up. Only went up 2 places! Lots of people must have used the bonuses this week.
Edit - Nevermind, turns out I went LSC close.
Edit - Nevermind, turns out I went LSC close.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 101277
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: PTBF 2018 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
I don't think Spence-Ocampo should be on PTBF. Honest opinion. I can't think of anyone that will give Ocampo a shot.
Re: PTBF 2018 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
ya talk about a straight up 100 percent correct winner fight, although they did say this comp isnt really about how competitive fights are, although tbh this doesnt really seem like a big fight either, its next week and really there hasnt been all that much talk about it
Re: PTBF 2018 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
The spence fight is a ridiculous choice.
Gross mismatch which will be shown on the night
Parker v Whyte is a good pick that will be close due to whytes home advantage
Gross mismatch which will be shown on the night
Parker v Whyte is a good pick that will be close due to whytes home advantage
Last edited by Andrew on 11 Jun 2018, 06:00, edited 1 time in total.
Re: PTBF 2018 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
This weeks game is called "guess which round the KO happens" ![[icon_twisted.gif] :twisted:](./images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)
Re: PTBF 2018 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Picking the KO round in Crawford-Horn, and calling Santa Cruz vs Mares correctly while also using bonuses on both bouts means it's probably the most perfect week I'm ever gonna have in the PTBF game. I jumped up 17 spots in the rankings. Biggest boost I ever recall getting in one week, and instantly put me back in the mix.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 101277
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: PTBF 2018 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Yeh, I see no one rooted for Horn or Mares. But they were seen as biggish fights.jamamb wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 21:34 ya talk about a straight up 100 percent correct winner fight, although they did say this comp isnt really about how competitive fights are, although tbh this doesnt really seem like a big fight either, its next week and really there hasnt been all that much talk about it
Re: PTBF 2018 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
You've played a blinder there mate! I'm not doing too bad in terms of getting them correct, but I've missed a couple of fights and haven't had the big scorers to keep pace with the leaders.gilgamesh wrote: ↑11 Jun 2018, 12:45Picking the KO round in Crawford-Horn, and calling Santa Cruz vs Mares correctly while also using bonuses on both bouts means it's probably the most perfect week I'm ever gonna have in the PTBF game. I jumped up 17 spots in the rankings. Biggest boost I ever recall getting in one week, and instantly put me back in the mix.
Re: PTBF 2018 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
You fuckers will find anything and everything to cry about.
It was a dead week.. so I added a fight.
It was a dead week.. so I added a fight.
Re: PTBF 2018 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
JCS, don't let anyone discourage you. Your game was, is and will be great!!! Thanks for all the effort you put into it. 
Re: PTBF 2018 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Oh, and again: Pacquiao - Matthysse will be on Jul-15, not Jul-14... In USA, it's also going to be July 15, early morning, like 6 or 7 am, I would say. But only if they fight in the evening in Malaysia, or at least by 6 pm or so... 
Re: PTBF 2018 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
dont think anyone is saying the game isnt great, dont know why some input like that would be taken as a big knock on the game overall, naturally for these types of games with subjective inclusion your gonna get feedback
