Saunders v DeGale
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Saunders v DeGale
Mr W confirms real possibility both will face each other 15 September.
Not sure what weight or who's titles would be on the line.
Not sure what weight or who's titles would be on the line.
Re: Saunders v DeGale
It would be for Degales title, no way Degale would move down to middleweight.
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Re: Saunders v DeGale
Interesting match up, but by god will it be hard to watch.
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32956
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Saunders v DeGale
BT PPV?
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Saunders v DeGale
I'm mystified as to why it's even being mentioned,a loss for either would be devastating at this point in their careers.
-
SenorPipino
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 6055
- Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40
Re: Saunders v DeGale
Why doesn't Saunders do Murray?
He kind of owes him.
Or how about Brit matchup with Spike O'Sullivan?
Entertaining bout that would be.
But Spike might want to instead sit back and wait on a massive Canelo payday.
At whatever weight, Saunders should box circles around DeGale, who looks like he's lost more than a step or two based on his performances against Truax.
He kind of owes him.
Or how about Brit matchup with Spike O'Sullivan?
Entertaining bout that would be.
But Spike might want to instead sit back and wait on a massive Canelo payday.
At whatever weight, Saunders should box circles around DeGale, who looks like he's lost more than a step or two based on his performances against Truax.
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Saunders v DeGale
He's already beaten Spike O'SullivanSenorPipino wrote: ↑20 Jun 2018, 15:25 Why doesn't Saunders do Murray?
He kind of owes him.
Or how about Brit matchup with Spike O'Sullivan?
Entertaining bout that would be.
But Spike might want to instead sit back and wait on a massive Canelo payday.
At whatever weight, Saunders should box circles around DeGale, who looks like he's lost more than a step or two based on his performances against Truax.
Re: Saunders v DeGale
Not something I’d especially want to see. I’d rather see Saunders fight any of Andrade, Charlo, Murata, etc
-
SenorPipino
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 6055
- Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40
Re: Saunders v DeGale
But under GBP, Spike has gained a sort of star quality that wasn't there when they last met.bigjack wrote: ↑20 Jun 2018, 16:01He's already beaten Spike O'SullivanSenorPipino wrote: ↑20 Jun 2018, 15:25 Why doesn't Saunders do Murray?
He kind of owes him.
Or how about Brit matchup with Spike O'Sullivan?
Entertaining bout that would be.
But Spike might want to instead sit back and wait on a massive Canelo payday.
At whatever weight, Saunders should box circles around DeGale, who looks like he's lost more than a step or two based on his performances against Truax.
Not to mention that Saunders stature has grown since then.
Before it was a fight that only attracted attention in the UK. Now it may capture international interest.
Re: Saunders v DeGale
It wouldn't attract international interest. It wouldn't attract much interest in the UK either.SenorPipino wrote: ↑20 Jun 2018, 16:19But under GBP, Spike has gained a sort of star quality that wasn't there when they last met.bigjack wrote: ↑20 Jun 2018, 16:01He's already beaten Spike O'SullivanSenorPipino wrote: ↑20 Jun 2018, 15:25 Why doesn't Saunders do Murray?
He kind of owes him.
Or how about Brit matchup with Spike O'Sullivan?
Entertaining bout that would be.
But Spike might want to instead sit back and wait on a massive Canelo payday.
At whatever weight, Saunders should box circles around DeGale, who looks like he's lost more than a step or two based on his performances against Truax.
Not to mention that Saunders stature has grown since then.
Before it was a fight that only attracted attention in the UK. Now it may capture international interest.
-
Mimmy
- Heavyweight

Re: Saunders v DeGale
Maybe Mr W is losing the edge in boxing promotions and is trying to put fights together that he thinks the public want to see, trying to get the edge back.
Imo any British match up like this will sell and get bums on seats.
Re: Saunders v DeGale
I would have thought Saunders waiting for either Alvarez or Golovkin would be a much better decision.
DeGale vs Groves II also seems like a much better fight to wait for.
It seems like a desperate move when there is no reason to be desperate.
Re: Saunders v DeGale
British world champion vs British world champion is great on paper but this just doesn't really do anything for me. Probably because Saunders should be looking at Golovkin and Canelo and DeGale should be looking at Groves/Smith. Plus the styles probably wouldn't gel at all.
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Saunders v DeGale
True,can't see anyone rushing to buy tickets for it.ewenhay wrote: ↑20 Jun 2018, 16:28It wouldn't attract international interest. It wouldn't attract much interest in the UK either.SenorPipino wrote: ↑20 Jun 2018, 16:19But under GBP, Spike has gained a sort of star quality that wasn't there when they last met.
Not to mention that Saunders stature has grown since then.
Before it was a fight that only attracted attention in the UK. Now it may capture international interest.
Re: Saunders v DeGale
If it goes down I'd favor Saunders confidently. Degale's kinda a frontrunner that always wears out during the 2nd half. Saunders is pretty consistent throughout a contest. Not spectacular most of the time, but more consistent than Degale.
Re: Saunders v DeGale
The form book says...... DeGale lost an absolute squeaker against Groves. BJS just about shaded Eubank. The Groves won every minute of every round against Eubank. I don't see any argument in favour of Billy Joe here; he's too small and not very good. It'll be awful to watch, but DeGale should win comfortably. You have to really dislike Billy Joe to want to see him in with a world class middleweight.....
Re: Saunders v DeGale
Who beat who has nothing to do with it. BJS beats DeGale for me. DeGale looks shot and outta ideas. The Jack fight took a massive part of him. BJS is hitting top form and JDG is on the slide.SamWise72 wrote: ↑21 Jun 2018, 05:37 The form book says...... DeGale lost an absolute squeaker against Groves. BJS just about shaded Eubank. The Groves won every minute of every round against Eubank. I don't see any argument in favour of Billy Joe here; he's too small and not very good. It'll be awful to watch, but DeGale should win comfortably. You have to really dislike Billy Joe to want to see him in with a world class middleweight.....
Re: Saunders v DeGale
Looking at some of my old scorecards: I don't see any pattern of DeGale losing the later rounds more than the early rounds.
Saunders has worn out in the 2nd half of fights many times.