Saunders v DeGale

Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Saunders v DeGale

Post by Horse »

SamWise72 wrote: 21 Jun 2018, 05:37The Groves won every minute of every round against Eubank.
No, he didn't.

He didn't even win every round.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Saunders v DeGale

Post by Stuarty »

Horse wrote: 21 Jun 2018, 05:54
gilgamesh wrote: 20 Jun 2018, 21:21 If it goes down I'd favor Saunders confidently. Degale's kinda a frontrunner that always wears out during the 2nd half.
Looking at some of my old scorecards: I don't see any pattern of DeGale losing the later rounds more than the early rounds.

Saunders has worn out in the 2nd half of fights many times.
DeGales stamina has always been an issue. He sits back on the ropes too much throughout most of his fights. He's also on the downward slope whereas BJS is hitting top form. BJS wins on points wide IMO.
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10941
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: Saunders v DeGale

Post by ILikeBeer »

Mimmy wrote: 20 Jun 2018, 13:36 Mr W confirms real possibility both will face each other 15 September.

Not sure what weight or who's titles would be on the line.
There's a possibility?

Well, don't just sit there. Make a poll.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Saunders v DeGale

Post by Stuarty »

ILikeBeer wrote: 21 Jun 2018, 05:59
Mimmy wrote: 20 Jun 2018, 13:36 Mr W confirms real possibility both will face each other 15 September.

Not sure what weight or who's titles would be on the line.
There's a possibility?

Well, don't just sit there. Make a poll.
:OhYes:
dirk2686
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1982
Joined: 26 Sep 2016, 09:35

Re: Saunders v DeGale

Post by dirk2686 »

SamWise72 wrote: 21 Jun 2018, 05:37 The form book says...... DeGale lost an absolute squeaker against Groves. BJS just about shaded Eubank. The Groves won every minute of every round against Eubank. I don't see any argument in favour of Billy Joe here; he's too small and not very good. It'll be awful to watch, but DeGale should win comfortably. You have to really dislike Billy Joe to want to see him in with a world class middleweight.....
The DeGale Groves fight was a long time ago to be fair. If the DeGale turns up who fought Truax, and that fight is far more relevant, then Saunders would rightly be the favourite.

I think both can end up overrated at times. Their best wins tend to overshadow some really ropy performances over the course of their careers. Speak to some and it's like DeGale should be criticised for nearly chucking away every good win he's had, whilst Saunders win against Lemieux is the reason why he'd be a contender to beat Canelo/GGG, nicely ignoring the garbage served up against Akavov.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Saunders v DeGale

Post by Horse »

Stuarty wrote: 21 Jun 2018, 05:57DeGales stamina has always been an issue. He sits back on the ropes too much throughout most of his fights. He's also on the downward slope whereas BJS is hitting top form. BJS wins on points wide IMO.
Yes, but he doesn't fade in the 2nd half of fights. He paces himself throughout the fight.

I think DeGale is getting underrated now. I don't think that he's as good as he was, but he looked significantly better in the Truax rematch than in the first fight. If he can improve a bit more on that then I think he can beat Saunders.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Saunders v DeGale

Post by Stuarty »

Horse wrote: 21 Jun 2018, 06:08
Stuarty wrote: 21 Jun 2018, 05:57DeGales stamina has always been an issue. He sits back on the ropes too much throughout most of his fights. He's also on the downward slope whereas BJS is hitting top form. BJS wins on points wide IMO.
Yes, but he doesn't fade in the 2nd half of fights. He paces himself throughout the fight.

I think DeGale is getting underrated now. I don't think that he's as good as he was, but he looked significantly better in the Truax rematch than in the first fight. If he can improve a bit more on that then I think he can beat Saunders.
I'm a fan of DeGale and have been since the start but he's not a good a boxer as BJS. Truax is really limited and he went life and death with him. I think the Jack fight took a lot from him. He looked better in the rematch but it was still a struggle. They type of fights drain you. BJS is fresh and on form. DeGale doesn't impose himself in fights.
SamWise72
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1346
Joined: 02 Jul 2011, 16:41

Re: Saunders v DeGale

Post by SamWise72 »

Billy Joe flatters to deceive, IMO. He's got one good win, against a total one trick pony. I loved DeGale, but he has frustrated the CRAP out of me by how lazy he can be, how he takes rounds off etc, but I really don't see Saunders' win against Lemiuex as signifying much. It's not that he's good, it's that Lemiuex wasn't
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Saunders v DeGale

Post by danconnollyeire »

They should name this fight insomnia therapy
moogie101
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 406
Joined: 15 Nov 2008, 14:11

Re: Saunders v DeGale

Post by moogie101 »

I get that BJS wants a big money fight after mugging off Murray for GGG & then seeing that fight instead go back to Canello but this is a terrible decision. Neither guy is a huge draw & style wise would make Fury/Wlad look like Hagler/ Hearns.

As for the possibility of it being on BT PPV, I'd pay money not to watch it
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47007
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Saunders v DeGale

Post by gilgamesh »

Horse wrote: 21 Jun 2018, 05:54
gilgamesh wrote: 20 Jun 2018, 21:21 If it goes down I'd favor Saunders confidently. Degale's kinda a frontrunner that always wears out during the 2nd half.
Looking at some of my old scorecards: I don't see any pattern of DeGale losing the later rounds more than the early rounds.

Saunders has worn out in the 2nd half of fights many times.
You don't score Degale's fights properly then. He slows down in the 2nd half almost always. Sometimes his opponent is so overmatched it just doesn't matter, and even a slowed down version of him is still just better than the guy he's fighting, and able to get the job done, but a great deal of the time it noticeably affects his work, and allows his opponent to come on stronger, and build some momentum.

More often than not he's very good in the 1st half though so a lot of the time he's able to maintain his earlier lead.

But to me he's about as consistent a 2nd half fader as Jean Pascal was. Those 2 guys did as consistently as any fighters I've seen at the Championship level.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Saunders v DeGale

Post by Horse »

gilgamesh wrote: 21 Jun 2018, 12:28You don't score Degale's fights properly then. He slows down in the 2nd half almost always. Sometimes his opponent is so overmatched it just doesn't matter, and even a slowed down version of him is still just better than the guy he's fighting, and able to get the job done, but a great deal of the time it noticeably affects his work, and allows his opponent to come on stronger, and build some momentum.

More often than not he's very good in the 1st half though so a lot of the time he's able to maintain his earlier lead.

But to me he's about as consistent a 2nd half fader as Jean Pascal was. Those 2 guys did as consistently as any fighters I've seen at the Championship level.
Well, I'm seeing things differently to you.

DeGale has won the majority of the last 4 rounds in the recent fights that I have scored.

I don't see the late fade that you do. I see it more as a general stamina/workrate issue that is fairly consistent throughout the fight.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47007
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Saunders v DeGale

Post by gilgamesh »

Horse wrote: 21 Jun 2018, 12:40
gilgamesh wrote: 21 Jun 2018, 12:28You don't score Degale's fights properly then. He slows down in the 2nd half almost always. Sometimes his opponent is so overmatched it just doesn't matter, and even a slowed down version of him is still just better than the guy he's fighting, and able to get the job done, but a great deal of the time it noticeably affects his work, and allows his opponent to come on stronger, and build some momentum.

More often than not he's very good in the 1st half though so a lot of the time he's able to maintain his earlier lead.

But to me he's about as consistent a 2nd half fader as Jean Pascal was. Those 2 guys did as consistently as any fighters I've seen at the Championship level.
Well, I'm seeing things differently to you.

DeGale has won the majority of the last 4 rounds in the recent fights that I have scored.

I don't see the late fade that you do. I see it more as a general stamina/workrate issue that is fairly consistent throughout the fight.
It'd be interesting to see the official scorecards from his bouts. I'd be willing to bet that the majority of rounds he's lost have come after Round 6.
pablothunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1155
Joined: 17 Oct 2009, 07:38

Re: Saunders v DeGale

Post by pablothunder »

Wow, the fight nobody wanted is in the pipeline!
Saunders and Degale should be in better and more logical fights (as if I needed to write that).
SamWise72
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1346
Joined: 02 Jul 2011, 16:41

Re: Saunders v DeGale

Post by SamWise72 »

DeGale doesn't fade at the end so much as often take the middle rounds off, and have to really fight at the end. I'm not gonna pretend I score all his fights carefully, but that's the frustrating trend I've noticed.
pablothunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1155
Joined: 17 Oct 2009, 07:38

Re: Saunders v DeGale

Post by pablothunder »

Yeah, that's the guy I've perceived too. Degale has always been one for going to sleep about rounds 5-9
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: Saunders v DeGale

Post by ewenhay »

I wouldn't say DeGale sets a high pace at any point of a fight.
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Saunders v DeGale

Post by BigDoofus »

SamWise72 wrote: 21 Jun 2018, 06:35 Billy Joe flatters to deceive, IMO. He's got one good win, against a total one trick pony.
Eubank or Andy Lee?
SamWise72
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1346
Joined: 02 Jul 2011, 16:41

Re: Saunders v DeGale

Post by SamWise72 »

BigDoofus wrote: 21 Jun 2018, 17:07
SamWise72 wrote: 21 Jun 2018, 06:35 Billy Joe flatters to deceive, IMO. He's got one good win, against a total one trick pony.
Eubank or Andy Lee?
Lemieux. I never rated Lee, and Eubank has been badly exposed since. If anything, the struggle he had to hold off Eubank now looks like a clear indication that he's not world level.
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8618
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: Saunders v DeGale

Post by coneye »

Not gonna happen , , just smoke and mirrors to keep Saunders name relevant , while he trys to keep his beltwithout defending against anyone decent , until he gets his cashout cheuque fighting Canelo or GGG ,, hOPEFULLY HE'LL BE MADE TO FIGHT SOMEONE DECENT OR STRIPPED
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Saunders v DeGale

Post by jamamb »

Horse wrote: 21 Jun 2018, 06:08
Stuarty wrote: 21 Jun 2018, 05:57DeGales stamina has always been an issue. He sits back on the ropes too much throughout most of his fights. He's also on the downward slope whereas BJS is hitting top form. BJS wins on points wide IMO.
Yes, but he doesn't fade in the 2nd half of fights. He paces himself throughout the fight.

I think DeGale is getting underrated now. I don't think that he's as good as he was, but he looked significantly better in the Truax rematch than in the first fight. If he can improve a bit more on that then I think he can beat Saunders.
i think part of it is bjs getting overrated since beating lemieux, he beats lemieux and suddenly ppl act like hes boxing everyones head off and is some kind of uncrowned p4p fighter whod befuddle top guys like canelo and jacobs and move through the weights picking up titles

even ggg looked a slick untouchable boxing master vs lemieux, but then compare how ggg looked vs jacobs, brook, canelo, etc......VERY hittable and rather limited. lemieux is made to flatter guys like bjs. even willie monroe, hardly moving his hands, did way better vs bjs and was 8-4 and 7-4-1 on two cards despite fighting with an awful mentality

i think degale has faded pretty hard though, he was better in the truax rematch but thats still a tough fight with caleb truax were talking about, who was like a c+ smw until he fought degale
Bigdogsnose
Middleweight
Posts: 1472
Joined: 02 Dec 2013, 08:36

Re: Saunders v DeGale

Post by Bigdogsnose »

As bad as degale has looked in his last couple and as good as BJS was in his last fight I'd favor Degale. The size difference has to be figured in, Degale's a good size SMW whereas BJS looks like he could do LMW. Degale tends to switch off, but how much would BJS really put it on him when he does. Their both slick boxers, so with the size and reach advantage and hopefully a renewed purpose I'd go degale.
Post Reply