What's your P4P 10 from 2000-now?
-
Grilling Machine
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3152
- Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28
Re: What's your P4P 10 from 2000-now?
Nothing for Vernon Forrest? Haye at cruiser?
Re: What's your P4P 10 from 2000-now?
where would you rank haye at cruiser? certainly i dont think hes a p4p top 10'er at all over the last 18 years
at best maybe an outside honorable mention. no longevity at cruiser and enzo mac and fragomeni are top 3 wins for him there. mormeck was a good win but a huge struggle, and actually the frago win was tough too. just dont see how he stacks up to most guys mentioned
Last edited by jamamb on 10 Jul 2018, 23:44, edited 1 time in total.
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16518
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: What's your P4P 10 from 2000-now?
If we are talking about a fighter at their very best for me it has to be Roy Jones, only an extraordinary fighter could school James Toney when he was also in his prime.
-
Grilling Machine
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3152
- Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28
Re: What's your P4P 10 from 2000-now?
Based on peak ability or his record? At his peak, I think he was the best of his generation.
Mayweather's miles out in front if we're basing this on records, but he missed lots of guys in their primes, and some altogether.
I'm talking about Forrest and Haye in snapshot: the best P4Pers from any given time, even if only for one or two fights. Froch has a better record than Calzaghe and Ward, for example, but who rates him more highly?
Re: What's your P4P 10 from 2000-now?
How can floyd be lightyears ahead of 2 when lost to castillo, had troubles with judah, maidana and ducked dangerous opponents such as prime psc & prime margarito and many other?tiny_acres wrote: ↑10 Jul 2018, 19:42You have never been more right.
Floyd is light years ahead of the number 2.
Jones from 1990-2000 is a good example of a #1 being lightyears ahaed 2 in that time period. Not only was he the best, but he dominated legends like toney or hopkins and made good opponents like pazienza or mccallum look like c level boxer. That is dominance. 90s jones would schooled opponents of the talent level of maidana and judah and not lose 4+ rds. And whenever floyd got into the ring with a legendary opponent it was far from very dominant. De la hoya, pacquiao, boring uds, where he wad running scared, far away from s brilliant performance.
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9446
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: What's your P4P 10 from 2000-now?
Your hatred clouds your objectivitySorono wrote: ↑11 Jul 2018, 01:56How can floyd be lightyears ahead of 2 when lost to castillo, had troubles with judah, maidana and ducked dangerous opponents such as prime psc & prime margarito and many other?tiny_acres wrote: ↑10 Jul 2018, 19:42You have never been more right.
Floyd is light years ahead of the number 2.
Jones from 1990-2000 is a good example of a #1 being lightyears ahaed 2 in that time period. Not only was he the best, but he dominated legends like toney or hopkins and made good opponents like pazienza or mccallum look like c level boxer. That is dominance. 90s jones would schooled opponents of the talent level of maidana and judah and not lose 4+ rds. And whenever floyd got into the ring with a legendary opponent it was far from very dominant. De la hoya, pacquiao, boring uds, where he wad running scared, far away from s brilliant performance.
Re: What's your P4P 10 from 2000-now?
Unlike most of you guys i have floyd inside my top 7 atg. There is no hatred.tiny_acres wrote: ↑11 Jul 2018, 23:25Your hatred clouds your objectivitySorono wrote: ↑11 Jul 2018, 01:56How can floyd be lightyears ahead of 2 when lost to castillo, had troubles with judah, maidana and ducked dangerous opponents such as prime psc & prime margarito and many other?tiny_acres wrote: ↑10 Jul 2018, 19:42
You have never been more right.
Floyd is light years ahead of the number 2.
Jones from 1990-2000 is a good example of a #1 being lightyears ahaed 2 in that time period. Not only was he the best, but he dominated legends like toney or hopkins and made good opponents like pazienza or mccallum look like c level boxer. That is dominance. 90s jones would schooled opponents of the talent level of maidana and judah and not lose 4+ rds. And whenever floyd got into the ring with a legendary opponent it was far from very dominant. De la hoya, pacquiao, boring uds, where he wad running scared, far away from s brilliant performance.
Jones and loma in prime are better than prime floyd. Prime pac is tough, but since manny is naturaly lighter smaller and would still give floyd hell, what would a same weight manny do to floyd. Floyd height and longer reach is a problem for manny. Prime mannys relentless attacks stamina and speed is a problem for floyd. Close.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: What's your P4P 10 from 2000-now?
Is the thread not about pound-for-pound fighters in the context of the year 2000 until the present day?Nightmare Roy wrote: ↑10 Jul 2018, 23:44 If we are talking about a fighter at their very best for me it has to be Roy Jones, only an extraordinary fighter could school James Toney when he was also in his prime.
Is it unreasonable to suggest that Roy’s best years were prior to the start of the Millennium?
Is it reasonable to claim that Jones Jr’s accomplishments during the current century were overshadowed by several other fighters?