I listed several factually correct points, which you flatly refuse to address.Mexi-Box wrote: ↑16 Jul 2018, 05:03Still waiting for what I asked. All you have done is speculate. You always put out information out of context then talk about facts. Instead all you provide are biases and a homotional agenda. It's your signature.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑16 Jul 2018, 04:56Are any of the points I've raised incorrect?Mexi-Box wrote: ↑16 Jul 2018, 04:24
You've made no attempts to tell me who was filing Pacquiao's taxes. You clearly don't know anything about his situation and are just speculating.
By the way, I don't even file my own taxes. I'm sure someone with Pacquiao's educational background knows the ins-and-outs, though.
Do they not accurately reflect reality?
This forum is filled to the brim with die-hard Pacquiao fans, but they've refrained from challenging the points raised in my posts, because they know that I'm simply speaking the truth.
You can try to employ red herring diversionary debating tactics if you want, as a weak attempt to move the topic of discussion onto safer ground for yourself, but this won't work, because I am speaking the truth... and knowledgeable boxing fans know this too.![]()
![]()
Instead, you want to discuss Pacquiao's accountants rather than directly addressing these points, because you cannot challenge my words, so you try to move the topic of discussion onto something else.
Do you need a reminder of the facts that I listed, which you blatantly ignore?
Are Pacquiao's own words insufficient evidence for you?